xeon oct Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 testing with a ASRockRack C236M WS (P2.60 BIOS) and Intel HD 530 SKL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRockRack C236M WS (P2.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB, Graphics: Intel HD 530 SKL GT2 3GB (1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRockRack C236M WS (P2.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB, Graphics: Intel HD 530 SKL GT2 3GB (1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRockRack C236M WS (P2.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB, Graphics: Intel HD 530 SKL GT2 3GB (1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 129.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 130.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 130.8 |==================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11493.41 |================================================================ 2 . 11572.31 |================================================================= 3 . 11582.65 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3097.23 |================================================================= 2 . 3121.78 |================================================================== 3 . 3126.12 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 396.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 395.82 |=================================================================== 3 . 397.72 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 396.65 |=================================================================== 2 . 396.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 396.11 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5748.70 |================================================================== 2 . 4872.09 |======================================================== 3 . 4745.63 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12376.40 |================================================================= 2 . 12289.79 |================================================================= 3 . 12316.05 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6797.65 |================================================================== 2 . 6561.97 |================================================================ 3 . 6789.85 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4247.93 |================================================================== 2 . 4243.32 |================================================================== 3 . 4239.72 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4264.48 |================================================================== 2 . 4264.80 |================================================================== 3 . 4268.37 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1478.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 1475.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 1482.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2391.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 2391.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 2393.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 209.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 205.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 207.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2459.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 2459.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 2458.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.6 |===================================================================== 2 . 11.6 |===================================================================== 3 . 11.6 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2179.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 2180.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2174.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 244.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 244.4 |==================================================================== 3 . 244.4 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2549.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 2548.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 2549.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 166.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 166.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 165.5 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2664.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 2657.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 2666.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.53 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.60 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.57 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2276.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 2271.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2278.1 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.04 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.04 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.04 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.36 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.35 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.36 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.30 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.28 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.26 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.76 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.76 |===================================================================== 3 . 2.76 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.49 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.46 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.47 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 18.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.81 |==================================================================== 3 . 18.78 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.55 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 20.02 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.09 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.09 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.09 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.48 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.47 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.45 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.47 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.47 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.48 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.57 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.41 |==================================================================== 3 . 8.49 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 46.51 |==================================================================== 2 . 46.59 |==================================================================== 3 . 46.64 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 57.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 57.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 57.96 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 63.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.31 |==================================================================== 3 . 63.42 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.82 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.82 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.82 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.86 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.87 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.86 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.01 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.04 |==================================================================== 3 . 10.02 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.28 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.30 |==================================================================== 3 . 10.30 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.32 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.34 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.34 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.53 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.53 |===================================================================== 3 . 7.54 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.50 |==================================================================== 3 . 20.58 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 34.24 |=================================================================== 2 . 34.62 |==================================================================== 3 . 34.44 |==================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 789.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 761.8 |================================================================== 3 . 789.1 |==================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 50561.3 |================================================================== 2 . 50765.0 |================================================================== 3 . 50754.8 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.8725 |=================================================================== 2 . 9.8730 |=================================================================== 3 . 9.8669 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.89 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.90 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 246.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 244.99 |================================================================== 3 . 244.99 |================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 858029.69 |================================================================ 2 . 852587.62 |================================================================ 3 . 855724.81 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 857229.23 |================================================================ 2 . 858442.75 |================================================================ 3 . 857338.88 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 747941.46 |================================================================ 2 . 422383.61 |==================================== 3 . 432916.59 |===================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 696300.52 |================================================================ 2 . 419568.24 |======================================= 3 . 424530.91 |======================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 460844.04 |================================================================ 2 . 441800.06 |============================================================= 3 . 462935.98 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 33187.34 |================================================================ 2 . 31782.04 |============================================================== 3 . 33477.66 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 33809.65 |================================================================= 2 . 33831.60 |================================================================= 3 . 33844.10 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 33897.96 |================================================================= 2 . 33900.11 |================================================================= 3 . 33531.66 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 23475.01 |================================================================ 2 . 23456.06 |================================================================ 3 . 23829.03 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20767.84 |================================================================= 2 . 20889.87 |================================================================= 3 . 20925.76 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20470.30 |================================================================= 2 . 20626.28 |================================================================= 3 . 20601.58 |================================================================= RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 107.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 106.57 |=================================================================== 3 . 105.33 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.074 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.075 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.073 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.023 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.327 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.326 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.329 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.090 |================================================================== 2 . 0.089 |================================================================= 3 . 0.093 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.577 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.576 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.584 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.029 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.029 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.012 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.012 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.012 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.025 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.024 |================================================================= 3 . 0.024 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.051 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.051 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.051 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.037 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.037 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.037 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.111 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.111 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.112 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.098 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.098 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.098 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.196 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.195 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.195 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |================================================================== 2 . 0.029 |================================================================== 3 . 0.030 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.138 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.139 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.139 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.088 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.088 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.089 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.507 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.505 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.505 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.351 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.351 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.351 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.114 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.111 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.111 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.412 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.408 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.411 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.872 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.874 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.873 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.975 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.976 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.977 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.549 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.588 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.554 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |================================================================== 2 . 0.029 |================================================================== 3 . 0.030 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.120 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.122 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.119 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.615 |================================================================== 2 . 0.631 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.625 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.482 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.479 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.483 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.626 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.607 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.626 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.109 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.110 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.109 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.034 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.034 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.034 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.562 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.556 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.563 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.148 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.145 |================================================================== 3 . 0.149 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.460 |================================================================== 2 . 2.483 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.521 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |=================================================== 2 . 0.003 |=================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.01 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.01 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.01 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.044 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.044 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.043 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.203 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.203 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.204 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 193636 |=================================================================== 2 . 187037 |================================================================= 3 . 186575 |================================================================= OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 65984 |=================================================================== 2 . 67348 |==================================================================== 3 . 67027 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 113194 |=================================================================== 2 . 102074 |============================================================ 3 . 103693 |=============================================================