test Intel Core i7-7700K testing with a Intel S1200SP (S1200SP.86B.03.01.0049.060120200516 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Kali 2021.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite. i7: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Intel S1200SP (S1200SP.86B.03.01.0049.060120200516 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 450GB INTEL SSDPE2MX450G7, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Kali 2021.3, Kernel: 5.14.0-kali2-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.21.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.3.5 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 3.0 + OpenCL 2.0 pocl 1.7 +Asserts LLVM 9.0.1 RELOC SLEEF DISTRO POCL_DEBUG, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0 + Clang 11.1.0-4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050 gl2: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Intel S1200SP (S1200SP.86B.03.01.0049.060120200516 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 450GB INTEL SSDPE2MX450G7, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Kali 2021.3, Kernel: 5.14.0-kali2-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.21.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.3.5 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 3.0 + OpenCL 2.0 pocl 1.8 Linux +Asserts RELOC LLVM 9.0.1 SLEEF DISTRO POCL_DEBUG, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0 + Clang 11.1.0-4 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050 yes: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Intel S1200SP (S1200SP.86B.03.01.0049.060120200516 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 450GB INTEL SSDPE2MX450G7, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Kali 2021.3, Kernel: 5.14.0-kali2-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.21.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 3.0 + OpenCL 2.0 pocl 1.8 Linux +Asserts RELOC LLVM 9.0.1 SLEEF DISTRO POCL_DEBUG, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0 + Clang 11.1.0-4 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 43.2 |==================================================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better i7 . MIN: 2.0 AVG: 22.9 MAX: 51.0 Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 12.45 |=================================================================== Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 1.06409 |================================================================= Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 1.07406 |================================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 34.54 |=================================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i7 . 15.33 |=================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1024 x 768 Score > Higher Is Better gl2 . 361 |==================================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 3.156 |================================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 44 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 120 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 522 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 1812 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 96 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 2000 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 102 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 514 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 497 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 633 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 196 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 740 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 237 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 1155 |=================================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better yes . 5.27 |=================================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better yes . 5578.9 |================================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 2489.94 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1097.83 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1525.65 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1777.70 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 6243.42 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1739.33 |================================================================ Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 7.057 |================================================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better yes . 13370.1 |================================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 4262.84 |================================================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 31130.86 |=============================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 51410.14 |=============================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1504.24 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 536.45 |================================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 326.04 |================================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1285.53 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 3720.99 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1652.19 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 664.29 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 153.59 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 188.14 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 747.54 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 992.51 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better yes . 1239.68 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 98.62 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 95.83 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 4289.96 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 4294.75 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 382.31 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 395.41 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 478.86 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 475.07 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 151.47 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 151.59 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 785.13 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better yes . 779.85 |================================================================= Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 6338 |=================================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 812308042 |============================================================== Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better yes . 47774 |================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better yes . 363.10 |================================================================= Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 36.27 |================================================================== dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 36.97 |================================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 75.18 |================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 16.00 |================================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 8.362 |================================================================== Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 20.06 |================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 30.66 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 47.52 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 60.91 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 105.03 |================================================================= OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 58.45 |================================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 0.11574211 |============================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 0.00102280 |============================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 10.37 |================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 389 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 1231 |=================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 1832 |=================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 3 |====================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 17 |===================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 67 |===================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 55931 |================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 54 |===================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 78 |===================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 92 |===================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 118 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 130 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 244 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 171 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 302 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 204 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 358 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 246 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 257 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 285 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 300 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 503 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 346 |==================================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better yes . 354 |==================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 44.46 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 5.30168 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 1.73600 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 43.95 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 7.17702 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 2.42003 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 8.64855 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 1.95901 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 12.10 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 9.52578 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 11.18 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 1.96023 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 14.47 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 1.74544 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better yes . 4.972 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better yes . 55.61 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better yes . 55.04 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better yes . 56.42 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better yes . 59.84 |================================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better yes . 202.54 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 59.88 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 29.04 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 282.89 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 909.71 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 84.17 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 13.06 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 32.49 |================================================================== Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better yes . 24.7 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better yes . 27.8 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better yes . 18.2 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better yes . 27.4 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better yes . 14.6 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better yes . 29.3 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better yes . 16.7 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better yes . 18.3 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 3139785.5 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 2436518.08 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 1856822.08 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 2918033.20 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 2121606.44 |============================================================= Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better yes . 146.78 |================================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better yes . 963 |==================================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better yes . 426526816.51 |=========================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 65841.34 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 279593.85 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 273640.87 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 268140.62 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 264535.82 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better yes . 258427.92 |============================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better yes . 766426 |================================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 49.52 |================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 64.65 |================================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better yes . 23.43 |==================================================================