3300X Okt AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core testing with a MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NR BIOS) and AMD FirePro V3800 512MB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NR BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD FirePro V3800 512MB, Audio: AMD Redwood HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-37-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NR BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD FirePro V3800 512MB, Audio: AMD Redwood HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-37-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NR BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD FirePro V3800 512MB, Audio: AMD Redwood HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-37-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NR BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD FirePro V3800 512MB, Audio: AMD Redwood HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-37-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2653.8 |=================================================================== B . 2511.7 |=============================================================== C . 2612.0 |================================================================== 4 . 2585.6 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 355.0 |==================================================================== B . 289.0 |======================================================= C . 304.6 |========================================================== 4 . 309.3 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3562.0 |=================================================================== B . 3588.5 |=================================================================== C . 3578.0 |=================================================================== 4 . 3582.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 23.2 |==================================================================== B . 23.6 |===================================================================== C . 23.1 |==================================================================== 4 . 23.4 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3268.5 |================================================================== B . 3319.0 |=================================================================== C . 3279.7 |================================================================== 4 . 3307.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 413.7 |==================================================================== B . 406.4 |=================================================================== C . 399.0 |================================================================== 4 . 384.9 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3692.3 |================================================================== B . 3703.7 |=================================================================== C . 3709.8 |=================================================================== 4 . 3720.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 304.6 |==================================================================== B . 284.0 |=============================================================== C . 272.9 |============================================================= 4 . 268.5 |============================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3854.5 |=================================================================== B . 3876.9 |=================================================================== C . 3874.8 |=================================================================== 4 . 3880.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 12.3 |==================================================================== B . 12.3 |==================================================================== C . 12.4 |===================================================================== 4 . 12.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3363.5 |================================================================== B . 3403.7 |=================================================================== C . 3421.3 |=================================================================== 4 . 3402.4 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.07 |===================================================================== B . 0.07 |===================================================================== C . 0.07 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.06 |=========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.64 |===================================================================== B . 2.65 |===================================================================== C . 2.65 |===================================================================== 4 . 2.60 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.30 |===================================================================== B . 7.22 |==================================================================== C . 7.17 |==================================================================== 4 . 7.12 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.36 |===================================================================== B . 5.31 |==================================================================== C . 5.35 |===================================================================== 4 . 5.29 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 22.20 |============================================================= B . 24.32 |=================================================================== C . 24.75 |==================================================================== 4 . 24.43 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 30.11 |=========================================================== B . 34.04 |=================================================================== C . 34.59 |==================================================================== 4 . 34.74 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 34.94 |=============================================================== B . 37.80 |==================================================================== C . 37.87 |==================================================================== 4 . 36.89 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.18 |===================================================================== B . 0.18 |===================================================================== C . 0.18 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.17 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.39 |===================================================================== B . 6.30 |==================================================================== C . 6.20 |=================================================================== 4 . 6.30 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.57 |===================================================================== B . 6.30 |================================================================== C . 6.42 |=================================================================== 4 . 6.33 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 15.99 |==================================================================== B . 15.87 |=================================================================== C . 15.86 |=================================================================== 4 . 15.78 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 84.97 |==================================================================== B . 83.44 |=================================================================== C . 83.42 |=================================================================== 4 . 80.46 |================================================================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 104.98 |=================================================================== B . 103.17 |================================================================== C . 103.72 |================================================================== 4 . 102.74 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 114.37 |=================================================================== B . 111.42 |================================================================= C . 111.28 |================================================================= 4 . 111.55 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4.09 |===================================================================== B . 4.07 |===================================================================== C . 4.09 |===================================================================== 4 . 4.09 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4.14 |===================================================================== B . 4.13 |===================================================================== C . 4.14 |===================================================================== 4 . 4.15 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 21.69 |==================================================================== B . 21.70 |==================================================================== C . 21.69 |==================================================================== 4 . 21.77 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 22.32 |==================================================================== B . 22.34 |==================================================================== C . 22.32 |==================================================================== 4 . 22.43 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.56 |===================================================================== B . 9.53 |===================================================================== C . 9.59 |===================================================================== 4 . 9.55 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.64 |==================================================================== B . 16.70 |==================================================================== C . 16.68 |==================================================================== 4 . 16.68 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 44.84 |==================================================================== B . 44.43 |=================================================================== C . 44.42 |=================================================================== 4 . 44.76 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 76.65 |==================================================================== B . 76.21 |=================================================================== C . 76.89 |==================================================================== 4 . 76.87 |==================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 1209.1 |=================================================================== B . 1209.3 |=================================================================== C . 1209.5 |=================================================================== 4 . 1210.0 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 78211.2 |================================================================== B . 78267.1 |================================================================== C . 78277.1 |================================================================== 4 . 78161.6 |================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.032 |==================================================================== B . 8.954 |=================================================================== C . 8.888 |=================================================================== 4 . 8.917 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.12 |==================================================================== B . 11.11 |==================================================================== C . 11.07 |==================================================================== 4 . 11.05 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.82 |==================================================================== B . 11.75 |==================================================================== C . 11.74 |==================================================================== 4 . 11.72 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.15 |==================================================================== B . 13.09 |==================================================================== C . 13.03 |=================================================================== 4 . 13.06 |==================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 55.65 |================================================================ B . 58.87 |==================================================================== C . 58.60 |==================================================================== 4 . 57.97 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.014 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.058 |=================================================================== B . 0.057 |================================================================== C . 0.059 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.058 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.014 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.214 |==================================================================== B . 0.213 |==================================================================== C . 0.213 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.213 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.048 |=================================================================== B . 0.049 |==================================================================== C . 0.048 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.047 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.857 |==================================================================== B . 0.854 |==================================================================== C . 0.852 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.853 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |================================================================== B . 0.030 |==================================================================== C . 0.029 |================================================================== 4 . 0.029 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.060 |=================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.060 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.054 |==================================================================== B . 0.054 |==================================================================== C . 0.054 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.054 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.123 |==================================================================== B . 0.123 |==================================================================== C . 0.123 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.122 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.02 |===================================================================== B . 0.02 |===================================================================== C . 0.02 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.02 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.024 |==================================================================== B . 0.024 |==================================================================== C . 0.024 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.024 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== B . 0.035 |==================================================================== C . 0.035 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.027 |================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.049 |==================================================================== B . 0.049 |==================================================================== C . 0.049 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.049 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.062 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |=================================================================== C . 0.062 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.062 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.278 |==================================================================== B . 0.275 |=================================================================== C . 0.275 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.275 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.246 |==================================================================== B . 0.246 |==================================================================== C . 0.247 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.245 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.159 |==================================================================== B . 1.149 |=================================================================== C . 1.157 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.148 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.286 |==================================================================== B . 0.285 |==================================================================== C . 0.285 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.284 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.605 |==================================================================== B . 0.604 |==================================================================== C . 0.601 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.601 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.447 |==================================================================== B . 1.449 |==================================================================== C . 1.450 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.449 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.562 |==================================================================== B . 2.574 |==================================================================== C . 2.559 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.558 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |====================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |================================================================ B . 0.017 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |================================================================ 4 . 0.016 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== B . 0.018 |==================================================================== C . 0.018 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.075 |==================================================================== B . 0.075 |==================================================================== C . 0.075 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.075 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.040 |==================================================================== B . 0.039 |================================================================== C . 0.040 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.039 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.113 |==================================================================== B . 0.112 |=================================================================== C . 0.113 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.113 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.071 |==================================================================== B . 0.070 |=================================================================== C . 0.070 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.070 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.074 |=================================================================== B . 0.075 |==================================================================== C . 0.074 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.074 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.369 |==================================================================== B . 0.371 |==================================================================== C . 0.369 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.370 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.297 |==================================================================== B . 0.297 |==================================================================== C . 0.298 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.297 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.536 |================================================================== B . 1.533 |================================================================== C . 1.532 |================================================================== 4 . 1.573 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.089 |=================================================================== B . 0.089 |=================================================================== C . 0.090 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.089 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.360 |==================================================================== B . 0.360 |==================================================================== C . 0.359 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.360 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.286 |=================================================================== B . 0.286 |=================================================================== C . 0.285 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.289 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.357 |==================================================================== B . 1.359 |==================================================================== C . 1.361 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.356 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.023 |==================================================================== B . 0.021 |============================================================== C . 0.021 |============================================================== 4 . 0.022 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.377 |==================================================================== B . 0.374 |=================================================================== C . 0.375 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.372 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.088 |================================================================ B . 0.087 |=============================================================== C . 0.094 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.088 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.657 |=================================================================== B . 1.677 |==================================================================== C . 1.612 |================================================================= 4 . 1.626 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.031 |================================================================ B . 0.032 |================================================================== C . 0.032 |================================================================== 4 . 0.033 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.128 |==================================================================== B . 0.127 |=================================================================== C . 0.123 |================================================================= 4 . 0.122 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 137625 |=================================================================== B . 120515 |=========================================================== C . 121613 |=========================================================== 4 . 134783 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 60718 |================================================================ B . 64250 |==================================================================== C . 61336 |================================================================= 4 . 59137 |=============================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 11645 |==================================================================== B . 11419 |================================================================== C . 11698 |==================================================================== 4 . 11378 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better B . 3489.9 |=================================================================== C . 3492.7 |=================================================================== 4 . 3487.7 |===================================================================