xeon october 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 testing with a Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS) and ASPEED on AlmaLinux 8.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: AlmaLinux 8.4, Kernel: 4.18.0-305.19.1.el8_4.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.4.1 20200928, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: AlmaLinux 8.4, Kernel: 4.18.0-305.19.1.el8_4.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.4.1 20200928, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: AlmaLinux 8.4, Kernel: 4.18.0-305.19.1.el8_4.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.4.1 20200928, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 D: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: AlmaLinux 8.4, Kernel: 4.18.0-305.19.1.el8_4.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.4.1 20200928, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 50156.11 |================================================================= B . 50020.12 |================================================================= C . 50278.18 |================================================================= D . 50111.21 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 22467.30 |=============================================================== B . 22473.43 |=============================================================== C . 23356.57 |================================================================= D . 23027.90 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2589.21 |================================================================== B . 2537.53 |================================================================= C . 2585.00 |================================================================== D . 2540.49 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2632.02 |================================================================== B . 2584.88 |================================================================= C . 2632.05 |================================================================== D . 2631.41 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 38919.35 |================================================================= B . 38864.83 |================================================================= C . 38840.51 |================================================================= D . 38789.34 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2073.48 |================================================================== B . 2083.97 |================================================================== C . 2075.94 |================================================================== D . 2076.61 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 39615.71 |================================================================= B . 39261.74 |================================================================ C . 39764.55 |================================================================= D . 39696.61 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 45433.61 |================================================================= B . 45042.94 |================================================================ C . 45305.12 |================================================================= D . 45417.98 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 24489.68 |================================================================= B . 24440.81 |================================================================= C . 24363.13 |================================================================= D . 24331.82 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 24710.73 |================================================================= B . 24661.00 |================================================================= C . 24656.28 |================================================================= D . 24529.64 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 9038.4 |================================================================== B . 9143.8 |=================================================================== C . 9210.4 |=================================================================== D . 8934.1 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2216.7 |================================================================= B . 2282.9 |=================================================================== C . 2192.9 |================================================================ D . 2148.7 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 66.9 |===================================================================== B . 66.7 |===================================================================== C . 65.4 |=================================================================== D . 66.0 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2562.5 |=================================================================== B . 2565.7 |=================================================================== C . 2532.9 |================================================================== D . 2515.6 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 410.3 |=================================================================== B . 415.3 |==================================================================== C . 412.0 |=================================================================== D . 388.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3009.2 |=================================================================== B . 3004.0 |=================================================================== C . 2999.9 |=================================================================== D . 2995.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 396.6 |==================================================================== B . 383.4 |================================================================== C . 383.4 |================================================================== D . 384.9 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3007.2 |================================================================== B . 2984.8 |================================================================== C . 3040.4 |=================================================================== D . 2998.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 18.1 |===================================================================== B . 17.0 |================================================================= C . 18.1 |===================================================================== D . 16.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2619.1 |================================================================== B . 2648.1 |=================================================================== C . 2654.0 |=================================================================== D . 2618.9 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 19.38 |==================================================================== B . 19.40 |==================================================================== C . 19.38 |==================================================================== D . 19.38 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 19.67 |==================================================================== B . 19.71 |==================================================================== C . 19.78 |==================================================================== D . 19.73 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 79.75 |==================================================================== B . 79.58 |==================================================================== C . 79.80 |==================================================================== D . 78.82 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 81.80 |================================================================== B . 84.70 |==================================================================== C . 82.79 |================================================================== D . 82.40 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 39.95 |==================================================================== B . 39.92 |==================================================================== C . 39.86 |==================================================================== D . 39.81 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 48.29 |==================================================================== B . 47.54 |=================================================================== C . 48.39 |==================================================================== D . 47.82 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 167.16 |=================================================================== B . 166.45 |=================================================================== C . 167.39 |=================================================================== D . 165.66 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 186.65 |=================================================================== B . 185.38 |=================================================================== C . 181.55 |================================================================= D . 182.18 |================================================================= OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 17966.5 |================================================================== B . 17885.2 |================================================================== C . 17698.1 |================================================================= D . 17756.2 |================================================================= OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 1183424.2 |================================================================ B . 1181770.0 |================================================================ C . 1182922.5 |================================================================ D . 1182939.2 |================================================================ ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.3450 |=================================================================== B . 5.3486 |=================================================================== C . 5.3448 |=================================================================== D . 5.3608 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.0798 |=================================================================== B . 7.1040 |=================================================================== C . 7.0780 |=================================================================== D . 7.0649 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.6851 |================================================================== B . 8.7594 |=================================================================== C . 8.7052 |=================================================================== D . 8.7136 |=================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 534988.25 |====================================================== B . 532424.69 |====================================================== C . 631672.00 |================================================================ D . 537952.56 |======================================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1288659.75 |============================================================== B . 1068376.12 |==================================================== C . 1171783.38 |========================================================= D . 1300559.25 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 847169.37 |============================================================ B . 839148.61 |============================================================ C . 900483.66 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 867186.23 |================================================================ B . 783042.14 |========================================================== C . 814210.98 |============================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 598446.35 |=============================================================== B . 589407.61 |============================================================== C . 605929.85 |================================================================ RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 78.84 |==================================================================== B . 76.70 |================================================================== C . 74.52 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 172500 |=================================================================== B . 154515 |============================================================ C . 165364 |================================================================ OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 77570 |==================================================================== B . 70292 |============================================================== C . 71894 |=============================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 10974 |==================================================================== B . 10337 |================================================================ C . 10483 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better C . 2853.5 |===================================================================