3700X October AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.12 |===================================================================== B . 0.12 |===================================================================== C . 0.12 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.90 |===================================================================== B . 3.89 |===================================================================== C . 3.89 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.46 |==================================================================== B . 9.65 |===================================================================== C . 9.50 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.84 |==================================================================== B . 7.85 |==================================================================== C . 7.91 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 34.85 |==================================================================== B . 34.76 |==================================================================== C . 34.14 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 46.41 |==================================================================== B . 46.72 |==================================================================== C . 43.60 |=============================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 49.26 |================================================================== B . 50.69 |==================================================================== C . 50.01 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.28 |===================================================================== B . 0.28 |===================================================================== C . 0.28 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.20 |==================================================================== B . 8.27 |===================================================================== C . 8.27 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.34 |===================================================================== B . 7.34 |===================================================================== C . 7.36 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 21.45 |==================================================================== B . 21.34 |==================================================================== C . 21.38 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 87.52 |==================================================================== B . 86.68 |=================================================================== C . 86.87 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 104.11 |=================================================================== B . 104.12 |=================================================================== C . 103.49 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 113.13 |=================================================================== B . 112.27 |================================================================== C . 106.81 |=============================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.0498 |=================================================================== B . 5.0806 |=================================================================== C . 5.0764 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.1031 |=================================================================== B . 9.1058 |=================================================================== C . 9.1113 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 83.20 |==================================================================== B . 83.29 |==================================================================== C . 83.18 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.910 |==================================================================== B . 8.507 |========================================================== C . 8.460 |========================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.79 |==================================================================== B . 11.55 |=================================================================== C . 11.43 |================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.05 |==================================================================== B . 12.08 |==================================================================== C . 11.95 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 14.61 |==================================================================== B . 14.52 |==================================================================== C . 14.46 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.28 |===================================================================== B . 7.26 |===================================================================== C . 6.90 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.33 |===================================================================== B . 7.36 |===================================================================== C . 7.35 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 35.00 |==================================================================== B . 35.09 |==================================================================== C . 34.63 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 35.91 |=================================================================== B . 36.34 |==================================================================== C . 36.07 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.58 |==================================================================== B . 16.62 |==================================================================== C . 16.46 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 28.24 |==================================================================== B . 28.41 |==================================================================== C . 28.21 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 66.16 |==================================================================== B . 66.12 |==================================================================== C . 66.28 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 120.91 |=================================================================== B . 121.16 |=================================================================== C . 120.17 |================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 2374.5 |=================================================================== B . 2374.6 |=================================================================== C . 2375.1 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 153476.6 |================================================================= B . 153360.9 |================================================================= C . 153563.9 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |================================================================ B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.070 |=================================================================== B . 0.071 |==================================================================== C . 0.071 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.014 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |=============================================================== C . 0.014 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.226 |=================================================================== B . 0.226 |=================================================================== C . 0.228 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.042 |==================================================================== B . 0.042 |==================================================================== C . 0.041 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.827 |==================================================================== B . 0.831 |==================================================================== C . 0.830 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |=============================================================== B . 0.014 |==================================================================== C . 0.014 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |==================================================================== B . 0.029 |==================================================================== C . 0.029 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.056 |=================================================================== B . 0.057 |==================================================================== C . 0.056 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.125 |==================================================================== B . 0.125 |==================================================================== C . 0.125 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.02 |===================================================================== B . 0.02 |===================================================================== C . 0.02 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.025 |==================================================================== B . 0.024 |================================================================= C . 0.024 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== B . 0.035 |==================================================================== C . 0.034 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.027 |================================================================== B . 0.027 |================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.050 |==================================================================== B . 0.049 |=================================================================== C . 0.050 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.275 |=================================================================== B . 0.276 |==================================================================== C . 0.278 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.246 |==================================================================== B . 0.245 |==================================================================== C . 0.246 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.156 |==================================================================== B . 1.149 |==================================================================== C . 1.147 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.300 |==================================================================== B . 0.301 |==================================================================== C . 0.302 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.621 |==================================================================== B . 0.619 |==================================================================== C . 0.623 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.532 |==================================================================== B . 1.530 |==================================================================== C . 1.539 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.665 |==================================================================== B . 2.660 |==================================================================== C . 2.657 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |====================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |================================================================ B . 0.017 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== B . 0.018 |==================================================================== C . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.076 |==================================================================== B . 0.076 |==================================================================== C . 0.076 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.040 |==================================================================== B . 0.039 |================================================================== C . 0.039 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.113 |==================================================================== B . 0.113 |==================================================================== C . 0.112 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.071 |==================================================================== B . 0.071 |==================================================================== C . 0.071 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.074 |=================================================================== B . 0.074 |=================================================================== C . 0.075 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.378 |==================================================================== B . 0.379 |==================================================================== C . 0.380 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.298 |==================================================================== B . 0.299 |==================================================================== C . 0.293 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.584 |==================================================================== B . 1.579 |==================================================================== C . 1.583 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.090 |==================================================================== B . 0.089 |=================================================================== C . 0.090 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.362 |==================================================================== B . 0.361 |==================================================================== C . 0.361 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.286 |==================================================================== B . 0.287 |==================================================================== C . 0.283 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.372 |==================================================================== B . 1.364 |==================================================================== C . 1.371 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |==================================================================== B . 0.021 |==================================================================== C . 0.021 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.388 |==================================================================== B . 0.388 |==================================================================== C . 0.389 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.086 |============================================================== B . 0.094 |==================================================================== C . 0.086 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.669 |=================================================================== B . 1.686 |==================================================================== C . 1.674 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.009 |==================================================================== B . 0.009 |==================================================================== C . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.033 |==================================================================== B . 0.032 |================================================================== C . 0.033 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.124 |==================================================================== B . 0.123 |=================================================================== C . 0.124 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 69.55 |=================================================================== B . 71.01 |==================================================================== C . 70.24 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3692.7 |================================================================ B . 3766.8 |================================================================= C . 3865.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 553.9 |================================================================== B . 547.0 |================================================================= C . 571.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3540.0 |=================================================================== B . 3539.2 |=================================================================== C . 3524.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 33.2 |==================================================================== B . 33.9 |===================================================================== C . 33.5 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3244.7 |=================================================================== B . 3256.7 |=================================================================== C . 3254.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 378.9 |==================================================================== B . 376.9 |==================================================================== C . 375.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3651.8 |=================================================================== B . 3655.8 |=================================================================== C . 3644.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 378.8 |==================================================================== B . 374.3 |=================================================================== C . 375.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3813.2 |=================================================================== B . 3804.3 |=================================================================== C . 3799.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 12.7 |==================================================================== B . 12.7 |==================================================================== C . 12.8 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3329.2 |================================================================== B . 3373.6 |=================================================================== C . 3364.9 |===================================================================