AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110275-TJ-3900XOKT784
3900X Okt
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13.2 |====================================================================
2 . 13.0 |===================================================================
3 . 13.3 |=====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3443.3 |===================================================================
2 . 3295.7 |================================================================
3 . 3372.0 |==================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 7.515 |===================================================================
2 . 7.622 |====================================================================
3 . 7.590 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3939.0 |===================================================================
2 . 3840.7 |=================================================================
3 . 3951.8 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 364.3 |====================================================================
2 . 360.5 |===================================================================
3 . 364.5 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3769.4 |===================================================================
2 . 3787.2 |===================================================================
3 . 3764.7 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 43.9 |=====================================================================
2 . 43.7 |=====================================================================
3 . 43.9 |=====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3212.9 |================================================================
2 . 3350.0 |===================================================================
3 . 3332.1 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3613.4 |===================================================================
2 . 3614.6 |===================================================================
3 . 3608.1 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 878.5 |====================================================================
2 . 846.8 |==================================================================
3 . 869.7 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 4872.7 |===================================================================
2 . 4762.8 |=================================================================
3 . 4876.8 |===================================================================
RAR Compression 6.0.2
Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 65.15 |=================================================================
2 . 67.13 |===================================================================
3 . 67.65 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 398.1 |====================================================================
2 . 393.6 |===================================================================
3 . 400.8 |====================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: rotate
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 11.12 |===================================================================
2 . 11.33 |====================================================================
3 . 11.12 |===================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 12.06 |==================================================================
2 . 12.37 |====================================================================
3 . 12.12 |===================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 15.14 |===================================================================
2 . 15.45 |====================================================================
3 . 15.05 |==================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Features 2D
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 137829 |===============================================================
2 . 146715 |===================================================================
3 . 140722 |================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Object Detection
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 94852 |====================================================================
2 . 94533 |====================================================================
3 . 92966 |===================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 15722 |===============================================================
2 . 16845 |====================================================================
3 . 16319 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1101.08 |==================================================================
2 . 1101.64 |==================================================================
3 . 1103.68 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1084.79 |==================================================================
2 . 1083.18 |==================================================================
3 . 1083.87 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.003 |====================================================================
2 . 0.003 |====================================================================
3 . 0.003 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.014 |===============================================================
2 . 0.015 |====================================================================
3 . 0.014 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.002 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.067 |====================================================================
2 . 0.064 |=================================================================
3 . 0.064 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.011 |==============================================================
2 . 0.012 |====================================================================
3 . 0.011 |==============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.194 |===================================================================
2 . 0.197 |====================================================================
3 . 0.196 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.038 |=================================================================
2 . 0.040 |====================================================================
3 . 0.039 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.763 |====================================================================
2 . 0.758 |====================================================================
3 . 0.761 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.003 |===================================================
2 . 0.004 |====================================================================
3 . 0.003 |===================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.004 |====================================================================
2 . 0.004 |====================================================================
3 . 0.004 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.016 |====================================================================
2 . 0.016 |====================================================================
3 . 0.016 |====================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 88753.17 |=================================================================
2 . 87631.47 |================================================================
3 . 88089.75 |=================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 95705.71 |================================================================
2 . 95224.86 |================================================================
3 . 96547.96 |=================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 88998.22 |================================================================
2 . 89188.87 |================================================================
3 . 90471.08 |=================================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 106496.90 |===============================================================
2 . 106229.77 |===============================================================
3 . 107431.71 |================================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 101113.53 |================================================================
2 . 99438.45 |===============================================================
3 . 100560.35 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.002 |====================================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 123493.39 |===============================================================
2 . 123730.20 |===============================================================
3 . 125810.07 |================================================================
OpenSSL
verify/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 226088.4 |=================================================================
2 . 225626.5 |=================================================================
3 . 225802.6 |=================================================================
OpenSSL
sign/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3499.4 |===================================================================
2 . 3498.1 |===================================================================
3 . 3498.7 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.007 |====================================================================
2 . 0.007 |====================================================================
3 . 0.007 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.013 |===============================================================
2 . 0.014 |====================================================================
3 . 0.013 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.029 |==================================================================
2 . 0.030 |====================================================================
3 . 0.030 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.015 |====================================================================
2 . 0.015 |====================================================================
3 . 0.015 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.062 |====================================================================
2 . 0.061 |===================================================================
3 . 0.059 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.054 |==================================================================
2 . 0.056 |====================================================================
3 . 0.056 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.122 |==================================================================
2 . 0.125 |====================================================================
3 . 0.122 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.019 |=================================================================
2 . 0.020 |====================================================================
3 . 0.020 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.024 |=================================================================
2 . 0.025 |====================================================================
3 . 0.024 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.035 |====================================================================
2 . 0.035 |====================================================================
3 . 0.033 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.029 |====================================================================
2 . 0.027 |===============================================================
3 . 0.027 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.049 |===================================================================
2 . 0.050 |====================================================================
3 . 0.050 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.059 |=================================================================
2 . 0.062 |====================================================================
3 . 0.060 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.267 |=================================================================
2 . 0.279 |====================================================================
3 . 0.278 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.239 |==================================================================
2 . 0.247 |====================================================================
3 . 0.248 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.147 |==================================================================
2 . 1.163 |===================================================================
3 . 1.178 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.290 |====================================================================
2 . 0.285 |===================================================================
3 . 0.284 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.610 |===================================================================
2 . 0.618 |====================================================================
3 . 0.614 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.473 |===================================================================
2 . 1.500 |====================================================================
3 . 1.489 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.610 |===================================================================
2 . 2.639 |====================================================================
3 . 2.565 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.004 |======================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |==================================
3 . 0.001 |==================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.016 |================================================================
2 . 0.017 |====================================================================
3 . 0.016 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.018 |====================================================================
2 . 0.018 |====================================================================
3 . 0.018 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.073 |================================================================
2 . 0.077 |====================================================================
3 . 0.076 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.038 |=================================================================
2 . 0.040 |====================================================================
3 . 0.040 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.112 |====================================================================
2 . 0.110 |===================================================================
3 . 0.110 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |=========================================================
2 . 0.006 |====================================================================
3 . 0.006 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.070 |===================================================================
2 . 0.071 |====================================================================
3 . 0.071 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.076 |====================================================================
2 . 0.072 |================================================================
3 . 0.072 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.370 |==================================================================
2 . 0.380 |====================================================================
3 . 0.364 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.295 |====================================================================
2 . 0.284 |=================================================================
3 . 0.286 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.530 |===================================================================
2 . 1.558 |====================================================================
3 . 1.524 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.087 |=================================================================
2 . 0.089 |===================================================================
3 . 0.091 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.359 |===================================================================
2 . 0.363 |===================================================================
3 . 0.366 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.274 |===================================================================
2 . 0.278 |====================================================================
3 . 0.280 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.312 |===================================================================
2 . 1.329 |====================================================================
3 . 1.317 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.021 |=================================================================
2 . 0.022 |====================================================================
3 . 0.021 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.388 |====================================================================
2 . 0.386 |====================================================================
3 . 0.377 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.091 |=================================================================
2 . 0.095 |====================================================================
3 . 0.087 |==============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.701 |====================================================================
2 . 1.667 |===================================================================
3 . 1.684 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.003 |====================================================================
2 . 0.003 |====================================================================
3 . 0.003 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.009 |====================================================================
2 . 0.009 |====================================================================
3 . 0.008 |============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.033 |====================================================================
2 . 0.032 |==================================================================
3 . 0.032 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.125 |====================================================================
2 . 0.122 |==================================================================
3 . 0.125 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 9.39 |=====================================================================
2 . 9.36 |=====================================================================
3 . 9.38 |=====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 36.93 |====================================================================
2 . 36.67 |====================================================================
3 . 36.75 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 20.59 |===================================================================
2 . 20.79 |====================================================================
3 . 20.74 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 35.80 |====================================================================
2 . 35.75 |====================================================================
3 . 35.52 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 65.80 |====================================================================
2 . 65.79 |====================================================================
3 . 65.68 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 119.84 |===================================================================
2 . 119.84 |===================================================================
3 . 118.94 |==================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.15 |=====================================================================
2 . 0.15 |=====================================================================
3 . 0.14 |================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 4.67 |=====================================================================
2 . 4.70 |=====================================================================
3 . 4.64 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 10.25 |==================================================================
2 . 10.24 |==================================================================
3 . 10.59 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 9.36 |=====================================================================
2 . 9.42 |=====================================================================
3 . 9.32 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 35.45 |===================================================================
2 . 35.29 |===================================================================
3 . 35.73 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 43.21 |===================================================================
2 . 42.97 |===================================================================
3 . 43.67 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 46.21 |====================================================================
2 . 45.74 |===================================================================
3 . 46.09 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.33 |=====================================================================
2 . 0.32 |===================================================================
3 . 0.32 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 8.68 |=====================================================================
2 . 8.68 |=====================================================================
3 . 8.71 |=====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 7.41 |=====================================================================
2 . 7.38 |=====================================================================
3 . 7.42 |=====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 21.81 |===================================================================
2 . 21.99 |====================================================================
3 . 21.71 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 86.92 |====================================================================
2 . 86.68 |====================================================================
3 . 87.32 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 102.57 |==================================================================
2 . 102.83 |===================================================================
3 . 103.35 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 110.51 |==================================================================
2 . 110.88 |===================================================================
3 . 111.47 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 615.62 |===================================================================
2 . 616.30 |===================================================================
3 . 619.89 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 203.79 |==================================================================
2 . 204.21 |==================================================================
3 . 207.87 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 579.25 |===================================================================
2 . 576.01 |==================================================================
3 . 581.68 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 454.18 |==================================================================
2 . 458.55 |==================================================================
3 . 463.79 |===================================================================