3900X Okt AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1101.08 |================================================================== 2 . 1101.64 |================================================================== 3 . 1103.68 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1084.79 |================================================================== 2 . 1083.18 |================================================================== 3 . 1083.87 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4872.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 4762.8 |================================================================= 3 . 4876.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 878.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 846.8 |================================================================== 3 . 869.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3613.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 3614.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 3608.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.9 |===================================================================== 2 . 43.7 |===================================================================== 3 . 43.9 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3212.9 |================================================================ 2 . 3350.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 3332.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 364.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 360.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 364.5 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3769.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 3787.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 3764.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 398.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 393.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 400.8 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3939.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 3840.7 |================================================================= 3 . 3951.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 13.3 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3443.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 3295.7 |================================================================ 3 . 3372.0 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 615.62 |=================================================================== 2 . 616.30 |=================================================================== 3 . 619.89 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 203.79 |================================================================== 2 . 204.21 |================================================================== 3 . 207.87 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 579.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 576.01 |================================================================== 3 . 581.68 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 454.18 |================================================================== 2 . 458.55 |================================================================== 3 . 463.79 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.15 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.15 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.14 |================================================================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.67 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.70 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.64 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.25 |================================================================== 2 . 10.24 |================================================================== 3 . 10.59 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.36 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.42 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.32 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 35.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 35.73 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 42.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 43.67 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 46.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 46.09 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.33 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.32 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.68 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.68 |===================================================================== 3 . 8.71 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.41 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.38 |===================================================================== 3 . 7.42 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 21.99 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.71 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 86.92 |==================================================================== 2 . 86.68 |==================================================================== 3 . 87.32 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 102.57 |================================================================== 2 . 102.83 |=================================================================== 3 . 103.35 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 110.51 |================================================================== 2 . 110.88 |=================================================================== 3 . 111.47 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.39 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.36 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.38 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 36.93 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 36.75 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 20.79 |==================================================================== 3 . 20.74 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35.80 |==================================================================== 2 . 35.75 |==================================================================== 3 . 35.52 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 65.80 |==================================================================== 2 . 65.79 |==================================================================== 3 . 65.68 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 119.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 119.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 118.94 |================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3499.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 3498.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 3498.7 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 226088.4 |================================================================= 2 . 225626.5 |================================================================= 3 . 225802.6 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.515 |=================================================================== 2 . 7.622 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.590 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.12 |=================================================================== 2 . 11.33 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.12 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.06 |================================================================== 2 . 12.37 |==================================================================== 3 . 12.12 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 15.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.05 |================================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 123493.39 |=============================================================== 2 . 123730.20 |=============================================================== 3 . 125810.07 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 106496.90 |=============================================================== 2 . 106229.77 |=============================================================== 3 . 107431.71 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 101113.53 |================================================================ 2 . 99438.45 |=============================================================== 3 . 100560.35 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 95705.71 |================================================================ 2 . 95224.86 |================================================================ 3 . 96547.96 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 88998.22 |================================================================ 2 . 89188.87 |================================================================ 3 . 90471.08 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 88753.17 |================================================================= 2 . 87631.47 |================================================================ 3 . 88089.75 |================================================================= RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 65.15 |================================================================= 2 . 67.13 |=================================================================== 3 . 67.65 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.014 |=============================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.014 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.067 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.064 |================================================================= 3 . 0.064 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.011 |============================================================== 2 . 0.012 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.011 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.194 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.197 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.196 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.038 |================================================================= 2 . 0.040 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.039 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.763 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.758 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.761 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |=================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.003 |=================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.013 |=============================================================== 2 . 0.014 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.013 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |================================================================== 2 . 0.030 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.030 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.062 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.061 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.059 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.054 |================================================================== 2 . 0.056 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.056 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.122 |================================================================== 2 . 0.125 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.122 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.019 |================================================================= 2 . 0.020 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.020 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |================================================================= 2 . 0.025 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.024 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.035 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.035 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.033 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.027 |=============================================================== 3 . 0.027 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.049 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.050 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.050 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.059 |================================================================= 2 . 0.062 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.060 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.267 |================================================================= 2 . 0.279 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.278 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.239 |================================================================== 2 . 0.247 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.248 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.147 |================================================================== 2 . 1.163 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.178 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.290 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.285 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.284 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.610 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.618 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.614 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.473 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.500 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.489 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.610 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.639 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.565 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |====================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |================================== 3 . 0.001 |================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.016 |================================================================ 2 . 0.017 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.016 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.073 |================================================================ 2 . 0.077 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.076 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.038 |================================================================= 2 . 0.040 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.040 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.112 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.110 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.110 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |========================================================= 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.070 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.071 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.071 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.076 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.072 |================================================================ 3 . 0.072 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.370 |================================================================== 2 . 0.380 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.364 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.295 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.284 |================================================================= 3 . 0.286 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.530 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.558 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.524 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.087 |================================================================= 2 . 0.089 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.091 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.359 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.363 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.366 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.274 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.278 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.280 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.312 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.329 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.317 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.021 |================================================================= 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.021 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.388 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.386 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.377 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.091 |================================================================= 2 . 0.095 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.087 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.701 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.667 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.684 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.008 |============================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.033 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.032 |================================================================== 3 . 0.032 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.125 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.122 |================================================================== 3 . 0.125 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 137829 |=============================================================== 2 . 146715 |=================================================================== 3 . 140722 |================================================================ OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 94852 |==================================================================== 2 . 94533 |==================================================================== 3 . 92966 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15722 |=============================================================== 2 . 16845 |==================================================================== 3 . 16319 |==================================================================