3950X Okt AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4444.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 4476.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 4356.1 |================================================================= 4 . 4307.1 |================================================================ 4 . 4309.2 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3626.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 3567.8 |================================================================== 3 . 3631.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 838.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 749.9 |============================================================= 3 . 790.9 |================================================================ 4 . 813.9 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3664.6 |================================================================== 2 . 3726.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 3705.7 |=================================================================== 4 . 3704.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 47.2 |===================================================================== 2 . 47.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 47.2 |===================================================================== 4 . 47.3 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3290.7 |================================================================ 2 . 3423.1 |================================================================== 3 . 3469.6 |=================================================================== 4 . 3275.7 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 374.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 376.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 379.3 |==================================================================== 4 . 375.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3822.9 |================================================================== 2 . 3794.8 |================================================================= 3 . 3889.0 |=================================================================== 4 . 3811.6 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 397.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 399.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 399.8 |==================================================================== 4 . 398.7 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3950.1 |================================================================== 2 . 4021.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 4017.9 |=================================================================== 4 . 3983.8 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.6 |===================================================================== 3 . 13.5 |==================================================================== 4 . 13.5 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3487.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 3499.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 3405.2 |================================================================= 4 . 3368.7 |================================================================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.32 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.34 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.32 |===================================================================== 4 . 5.32 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.40 |================================================================= 4 . 11.47 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.64 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.32 |================================================================== 3 . 10.67 |==================================================================== 4 . 10.50 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 39.76 |================================================================== 2 . 40.74 |==================================================================== 3 . 39.16 |================================================================= 4 . 40.50 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 48.40 |================================================================== 2 . 50.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 47.38 |================================================================ 4 . 49.65 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 52.33 |================================================================== 2 . 53.53 |==================================================================== 3 . 51.00 |================================================================= 4 . 53.16 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.71 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.69 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.67 |===================================================================== 4 . 9.66 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.89 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.90 |===================================================================== 3 . 7.85 |===================================================================== 4 . 7.89 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 25.21 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.07 |=================================================================== 4 . 25.33 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 98.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 98.61 |=================================================================== 3 . 99.50 |==================================================================== 4 . 98.71 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 113.62 |================================================================ 2 . 114.76 |================================================================= 3 . 118.05 |=================================================================== 4 . 115.73 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 121.73 |================================================================== 2 . 124.42 |=================================================================== 3 . 122.34 |================================================================== 4 . 122.09 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.67 |==================================================================== 4 . 13.71 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 52.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 52.74 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.31 |=================================================================== 4 . 52.39 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 27.19 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 27.05 |==================================================================== 4 . 27.19 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 48.39 |==================================================================== 2 . 48.65 |==================================================================== 3 . 48.21 |=================================================================== 4 . 48.48 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 103.70 |================================================================== 2 . 104.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 104.53 |=================================================================== 4 . 103.03 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 184.05 |================================================================== 2 . 186.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 185.14 |=================================================================== 4 . 184.58 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 401.40 |================================================================= 2 . 411.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 408.04 |================================================================== 4 . 406.26 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 431.06 |================================================================ 2 . 450.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 443.13 |================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.32 |=========================================================== 2 . 16.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 16.17 |=================================================================== 4 . 16.49 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 857.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 808.65 |=============================================================== 3 . 856.20 |=================================================================== 4 . 860.13 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 529.04 |================================================================== 2 . 528.02 |================================================================== 3 . 535.70 |=================================================================== 4 . 525.67 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15300 |=================================================================== 2 . 15490 |==================================================================== 3 . 15290 |=================================================================== 4 . 15260 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3464.63 |============================================================== 2 . 3455.42 |============================================================== 3 . 3574.31 |================================================================ 4 . 3685.79 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 576930 |=================================================================== 2 . 577910 |=================================================================== 3 . 574810 |=================================================================== 4 . 564790 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3741.80 |================================================================== 2 . 3747.71 |================================================================== 3 . 3745.25 |================================================================== 4 . 3737.87 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 137770 |=================================================================== 2 . 136540 |================================================================== 3 . 137070 |=================================================================== 4 . 137430 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12660 |==================================================================== 2 . 12500 |=================================================================== 3 . 12490 |=================================================================== 4 . 12560 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 42360 |================================================================= 2 . 44390 |==================================================================== 3 . 42400 |================================================================= 4 . 42140 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 135490 |=================================================================== 2 . 135720 |=================================================================== 3 . 135550 |=================================================================== 4 . 134940 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 245150 |================================================================== 2 . 237910 |================================================================ 3 . 248930 |=================================================================== 4 . 248400 |=================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4768.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 4768.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 4765.9 |=================================================================== 4 . 4763.6 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 308505.4 |================================================================= 2 . 308603.1 |================================================================= 3 . 308201.8 |================================================================= 4 . 307821.5 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 35711 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.028 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 619 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.615 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 585591 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.085 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 575743 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.174 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 584739 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.428 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 633 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 78.95 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 544415 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.918 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 34593 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.029 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 621 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 161.16 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 593 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 421.93 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 481 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1038.99 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 298 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.359 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 555122 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.09 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11985 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.083 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 539716 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.185 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 558384 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.448 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 5012 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.976 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 507098 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.986 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 296 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.381 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 90595 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.552 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4271 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.42 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4947 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 50.54 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4991 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 100.18 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 83857 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.193 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 77507 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.226 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1984 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.20 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.1809 |================================================================ 2 . 4.3456 |=================================================================== 3 . 4.3750 |=================================================================== 4 . 4.3609 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.8589 |================================================================= 2 . 9.0773 |=================================================================== 3 . 9.0371 |=================================================================== 4 . 9.0741 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 41.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.29 |==================================================================== 3 . 41.26 |==================================================================== 4 . 41.27 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.245 |=================================================================== 2 . 7.342 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.337 |==================================================================== 4 . 7.293 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.04 |================================================================== 2 . 10.97 |================================================================== 3 . 11.37 |==================================================================== 4 . 10.91 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 12.28 |=================================================================== 3 . 12.42 |==================================================================== 4 . 12.27 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.29 |================================================================== 2 . 15.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 15.72 |==================================================================== 4 . 15.62 |==================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1320655.00 |============================================================== 2 . 1339405.25 |=============================================================== 3 . 1286339.00 |============================================================= 4 . 1282215.75 |============================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1279754.25 |============================================================== 2 . 1295504.62 |=============================================================== 3 . 1267909.25 |============================================================== 4 . 1275184.88 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1176697.98 |=============================================================== 2 . 716820.55 |====================================== 3 . 715013.88 |====================================== 4 . 728279.34 |======================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1078716.76 |=============================================================== 2 . 702416.70 |========================================= 3 . 721985.74 |========================================== 4 . 694246.55 |========================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 853399.52 |================================================================ 2 . 792960.14 |=========================================================== 3 . 784408.47 |=========================================================== 4 . 791204.55 |=========================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 120291.35 |================================================================ 2 . 118730.51 |=============================================================== 3 . 118800.73 |=============================================================== 4 . 119478.96 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 105685.28 |================================================================ 2 . 104629.03 |=============================================================== 3 . 105204.35 |=============================================================== 4 . 106276.85 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 98302.67 |============================================================= 2 . 98189.86 |============================================================= 3 . 102493.30 |================================================================ 4 . 98248.42 |============================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 93750.22 |================================================================= 2 . 93578.69 |================================================================= 3 . 93050.59 |================================================================= 4 . 92784.58 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 87947.21 |================================================================= 2 . 87564.69 |================================================================= 3 . 87830.82 |================================================================= 4 . 87800.37 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 86005.38 |================================================================= 2 . 85498.29 |================================================================= 3 . 85396.17 |================================================================= 4 . 84878.46 |================================================================ RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 58.41 |================================================================== 2 . 60.44 |==================================================================== 3 . 60.19 |==================================================================== 4 . 60.02 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.017 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.016 |================================================================ 3 . 0.017 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.016 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.060 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.057 |================================================================= 3 . 0.057 |================================================================= 4 . 0.057 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.011 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.011 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.011 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.011 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.177 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.176 |================================================================== 3 . 0.180 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.177 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.035 |================================================================ 2 . 0.036 |================================================================== 3 . 0.037 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.035 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.718 |================================================================== 2 . 0.723 |================================================================== 3 . 0.741 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.726 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |=================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |================================================================ 3 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.013 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.013 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.013 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.028 |================================================================== 2 . 0.028 |================================================================== 3 . 0.028 |================================================================== 4 . 0.029 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.014 |=============================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.014 |=============================================================== 4 . 0.014 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.057 |================================================================= 2 . 0.058 |================================================================== 3 . 0.059 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.060 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.052 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.053 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.053 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.121 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.118 |================================================================== 3 . 0.118 |================================================================== 4 . 0.121 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.019 |================================================================= 2 . 0.020 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.019 |================================================================= 4 . 0.020 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.023 |================================================================= 2 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.024 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.034 |================================================================== 2 . 0.034 |================================================================== 3 . 0.034 |================================================================== 4 . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.028 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.026 |=============================================================== 3 . 0.027 |================================================================== 4 . 0.026 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.050 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.048 |================================================================= 3 . 0.049 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.049 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.059 |================================================================== 2 . 0.061 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.058 |================================================================= 4 . 0.059 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.259 |================================================================ 2 . 0.275 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.270 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.273 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.243 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.232 |================================================================= 3 . 0.232 |================================================================= 4 . 0.238 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.115 |================================================================= 2 . 1.156 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.160 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.150 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.278 |================================================================== 2 . 0.279 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.279 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.285 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.588 |================================================================== 2 . 0.580 |================================================================== 3 . 0.591 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.602 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.427 |================================================================== 2 . 1.422 |================================================================== 3 . 1.460 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.443 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.511 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.562 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.560 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.512 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |====================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |================================== 4 . 0.001 |================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.016 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.017 |================================================================ 3 . 0.017 |================================================================ 4 . 0.017 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.073 |================================================================== 2 . 0.075 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.072 |================================================================= 4 . 0.072 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.039 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.038 |================================================================== 3 . 0.038 |================================================================== 4 . 0.038 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.106 |================================================================ 2 . 0.112 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.109 |================================================================== 4 . 0.111 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.070 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.070 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.070 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.069 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.074 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.071 |================================================================= 3 . 0.070 |================================================================ 4 . 0.072 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.370 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.357 |================================================================== 3 . 0.370 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.368 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.286 |================================================================= 2 . 0.297 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.296 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.297 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.495 |================================================================== 2 . 1.495 |================================================================== 3 . 1.535 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.530 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.085 |================================================================= 2 . 0.086 |================================================================== 3 . 0.087 |================================================================== 4 . 0.089 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.342 |================================================================= 2 . 0.360 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.359 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.346 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.284 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.283 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.277 |================================================================== 4 . 0.284 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.357 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.292 |================================================================= 3 . 1.293 |================================================================= 4 . 1.350 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.021 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.374 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.379 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.380 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.377 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.088 |=========================================================== 2 . 0.102 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.093 |============================================================== 4 . 0.086 |========================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.661 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.651 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.635 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.031 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.030 |================================================================== 3 . 0.030 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.121 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.122 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.120 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 110052 |=================================================================== 2 . 104378 |================================================================ 3 . 104596 |================================================================ OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 78056 |================================================= 2 . 106004 |=================================================================== 3 . 71207 |============================================= OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15471 |==================================================================== 2 . 14503 |================================================================ 3 . 12324 |======================================================