AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110273-TJ-3950XOKT523
3950X Okt
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
4:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB (1260/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I211 + Realtek RTL8822BE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |==================================
4 . 0.001 |==================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: GET
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1176697.98 |===============================================================
2 . 716820.55 |======================================
3 . 715013.88 |======================================
4 . 728279.34 |=======================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: MIX
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1078716.76 |===============================================================
2 . 702416.70 |=========================================
3 . 721985.74 |==========================================
4 . 694246.55 |=========================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Object Detection
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 78056 |=================================================
2 . 106004 |===================================================================
3 . 71207 |=============================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.003 |===================================================
2 . 0.004 |====================================================================
3 . 0.004 |====================================================================
4 . 0.004 |====================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 15471 |====================================================================
2 . 14503 |================================================================
3 . 12324 |======================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
4 . 0.004 |======================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.088 |===========================================================
2 . 0.102 |====================================================================
3 . 0.093 |==============================================================
4 . 0.086 |=========================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 14.32 |===========================================================
2 . 16.25 |===================================================================
3 . 16.17 |===================================================================
4 . 16.49 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 838.3 |====================================================================
2 . 749.9 |=============================================================
3 . 790.9 |================================================================
4 . 813.9 |==================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: SET
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 853399.52 |================================================================
2 . 792960.14 |===========================================================
3 . 784408.47 |===========================================================
4 . 791204.55 |===========================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.028 |====================================================================
2 . 0.026 |===============================================================
3 . 0.027 |==================================================================
4 . 0.026 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.014 |===============================================================
2 . 0.015 |====================================================================
3 . 0.014 |===============================================================
4 . 0.014 |===============================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3464.63 |==============================================================
2 . 3455.42 |==============================================================
3 . 3574.31 |================================================================
4 . 3685.79 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.016 |====================================================================
2 . 0.015 |================================================================
3 . 0.016 |====================================================================
4 . 0.016 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 857.03 |===================================================================
2 . 808.65 |===============================================================
3 . 856.20 |===================================================================
4 . 860.13 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.017 |====================================================================
2 . 0.016 |================================================================
3 . 0.017 |====================================================================
4 . 0.016 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.259 |================================================================
2 . 0.275 |====================================================================
3 . 0.270 |===================================================================
4 . 0.273 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3290.7 |================================================================
2 . 3423.1 |==================================================================
3 . 3469.6 |===================================================================
4 . 3275.7 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.018 |====================================================================
2 . 0.017 |================================================================
3 . 0.017 |================================================================
4 . 0.017 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.074 |====================================================================
2 . 0.071 |=================================================================
3 . 0.070 |================================================================
4 . 0.072 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.035 |================================================================
2 . 0.036 |==================================================================
3 . 0.037 |====================================================================
4 . 0.035 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.106 |================================================================
2 . 0.112 |====================================================================
3 . 0.109 |==================================================================
4 . 0.111 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 48.40 |==================================================================
2 . 50.05 |====================================================================
3 . 47.38 |================================================================
4 . 49.65 |===================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Features 2D
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 110052 |===================================================================
2 . 104378 |================================================================
3 . 104596 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 42360 |=================================================================
2 . 44390 |====================================================================
3 . 42400 |=================================================================
4 . 42140 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.342 |=================================================================
2 . 0.360 |====================================================================
3 . 0.359 |====================================================================
4 . 0.346 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.019 |=================================================================
2 . 0.020 |====================================================================
3 . 0.019 |=================================================================
4 . 0.020 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.057 |=================================================================
2 . 0.058 |==================================================================
3 . 0.059 |===================================================================
4 . 0.060 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.060 |====================================================================
2 . 0.057 |=================================================================
3 . 0.057 |=================================================================
4 . 0.057 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.059 |==================================================================
2 . 0.061 |====================================================================
3 . 0.058 |=================================================================
4 . 0.059 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.357 |====================================================================
2 . 1.292 |=================================================================
3 . 1.293 |=================================================================
4 . 1.350 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 52.33 |==================================================================
2 . 53.53 |====================================================================
3 . 51.00 |=================================================================
4 . 53.16 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 11.88 |====================================================================
2 . 11.95 |====================================================================
3 . 11.40 |=================================================================
4 . 11.47 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.022 |====================================================================
2 . 0.022 |====================================================================
3 . 0.022 |====================================================================
4 . 0.021 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.243 |====================================================================
2 . 0.232 |=================================================================
3 . 0.232 |=================================================================
4 . 0.238 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.085 |=================================================================
2 . 0.086 |==================================================================
3 . 0.087 |==================================================================
4 . 0.089 |====================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Medium
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 4.1809 |================================================================
2 . 4.3456 |===================================================================
3 . 4.3750 |===================================================================
4 . 4.3609 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 245150 |==================================================================
2 . 237910 |================================================================
3 . 248930 |===================================================================
4 . 248400 |===================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 431.06 |================================================================
2 . 450.91 |===================================================================
3 . 443.13 |==================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1320655.00 |==============================================================
2 . 1339405.25 |===============================================================
3 . 1286339.00 |=============================================================
4 . 1282215.75 |============================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 98302.67 |=============================================================
2 . 98189.86 |=============================================================
3 . 102493.30 |================================================================
4 . 98248.42 |=============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.023 |=================================================================
2 . 0.024 |====================================================================
3 . 0.024 |====================================================================
4 . 0.024 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.073 |==================================================================
2 . 0.075 |====================================================================
3 . 0.072 |=================================================================
4 . 0.072 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.050 |====================================================================
2 . 0.048 |=================================================================
3 . 0.049 |===================================================================
4 . 0.049 |===================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: rotate
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 11.04 |==================================================================
2 . 10.97 |==================================================================
3 . 11.37 |====================================================================
4 . 10.91 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.115 |=================================================================
2 . 1.156 |====================================================================
3 . 1.160 |====================================================================
4 . 1.150 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 39.76 |==================================================================
2 . 40.74 |====================================================================
3 . 39.16 |=================================================================
4 . 40.50 |====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
4 . 4309.2 |================================================================
1 . 4444.3 |===================================================================
2 . 4476.9 |===================================================================
3 . 4356.1 |=================================================================
4 . 4307.1 |================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 113.62 |================================================================
2 . 114.76 |=================================================================
3 . 118.05 |===================================================================
4 . 115.73 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3487.7 |===================================================================
2 . 3499.3 |===================================================================
3 . 3405.2 |=================================================================
4 . 3368.7 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.286 |=================================================================
2 . 0.297 |====================================================================
3 . 0.296 |====================================================================
4 . 0.297 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.588 |==================================================================
2 . 0.580 |==================================================================
3 . 0.591 |===================================================================
4 . 0.602 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.370 |====================================================================
2 . 0.357 |==================================================================
3 . 0.370 |====================================================================
4 . 0.368 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.028 |==================================================================
2 . 0.028 |==================================================================
3 . 0.028 |==================================================================
4 . 0.029 |====================================================================
RAR Compression 6.0.2
Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 58.41 |==================================================================
2 . 60.44 |====================================================================
3 . 60.19 |====================================================================
4 . 60.02 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 10.64 |====================================================================
2 . 10.32 |==================================================================
3 . 10.67 |====================================================================
4 . 10.50 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.031 |====================================================================
2 . 0.030 |==================================================================
3 . 0.030 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.718 |==================================================================
2 . 0.723 |==================================================================
3 . 0.741 |====================================================================
4 . 0.726 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.034 |==================================================================
2 . 0.034 |==================================================================
3 . 0.034 |==================================================================
4 . 0.035 |====================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 15.29 |==================================================================
2 . 15.51 |===================================================================
3 . 15.72 |====================================================================
4 . 15.62 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.495 |==================================================================
2 . 1.495 |==================================================================
3 . 1.535 |====================================================================
4 . 1.530 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.427 |==================================================================
2 . 1.422 |==================================================================
3 . 1.460 |====================================================================
4 . 1.443 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.039 |====================================================================
2 . 0.038 |==================================================================
3 . 0.038 |==================================================================
4 . 0.038 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.121 |====================================================================
2 . 0.118 |==================================================================
3 . 0.118 |==================================================================
4 . 0.121 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.284 |====================================================================
2 . 0.283 |====================================================================
3 . 0.277 |==================================================================
4 . 0.284 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.278 |==================================================================
2 . 0.279 |===================================================================
3 . 0.279 |===================================================================
4 . 0.285 |====================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 401.40 |=================================================================
2 . 411.44 |===================================================================
3 . 408.04 |==================================================================
4 . 406.26 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3822.9 |==================================================================
2 . 3794.8 |=================================================================
3 . 3889.0 |===================================================================
4 . 3811.6 |==================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Thorough
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 8.8589 |=================================================================
2 . 9.0773 |===================================================================
3 . 9.0371 |===================================================================
4 . 9.0741 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 576930 |===================================================================
2 . 577910 |===================================================================
3 . 574810 |===================================================================
4 . 564790 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.177 |===================================================================
2 . 0.176 |==================================================================
3 . 0.180 |====================================================================
4 . 0.177 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 121.73 |==================================================================
2 . 124.42 |===================================================================
3 . 122.34 |==================================================================
4 . 122.09 |==================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1279754.25 |==============================================================
2 . 1295504.62 |===============================================================
3 . 1267909.25 |==============================================================
4 . 1275184.88 |==============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.511 |===================================================================
2 . 2.562 |====================================================================
3 . 2.560 |====================================================================
4 . 2.512 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.052 |===================================================================
2 . 0.052 |===================================================================
3 . 0.053 |====================================================================
4 . 0.053 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 529.04 |==================================================================
2 . 528.02 |==================================================================
3 . 535.70 |===================================================================
4 . 525.67 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3950.1 |==================================================================
2 . 4021.9 |===================================================================
3 . 4017.9 |===================================================================
4 . 3983.8 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3626.4 |===================================================================
2 . 3567.8 |==================================================================
3 . 3631.4 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3664.6 |==================================================================
2 . 3726.2 |===================================================================
3 . 3705.7 |===================================================================
4 . 3704.0 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.121 |===================================================================
2 . 0.122 |====================================================================
3 . 0.120 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 24.93 |===================================================================
2 . 25.21 |====================================================================
3 . 25.07 |===================================================================
4 . 25.33 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.374 |===================================================================
2 . 0.379 |====================================================================
3 . 0.380 |====================================================================
4 . 0.377 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.661 |====================================================================
2 . 1.651 |====================================================================
3 . 1.635 |===================================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 105685.28 |================================================================
2 . 104629.03 |===============================================================
3 . 105204.35 |===============================================================
4 . 106276.85 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 15300 |===================================================================
2 . 15490 |====================================================================
3 . 15290 |===================================================================
4 . 15260 |===================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13.4 |====================================================================
2 . 13.6 |=====================================================================
3 . 13.5 |====================================================================
4 . 13.5 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 103.70 |==================================================================
2 . 104.24 |===================================================================
3 . 104.53 |===================================================================
4 . 103.03 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.070 |====================================================================
2 . 0.070 |====================================================================
3 . 0.070 |====================================================================
4 . 0.069 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 12660 |====================================================================
2 . 12500 |===================================================================
3 . 12490 |===================================================================
4 . 12560 |===================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 7.245 |===================================================================
2 . 7.342 |====================================================================
3 . 7.337 |====================================================================
4 . 7.293 |====================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 86005.38 |=================================================================
2 . 85498.29 |=================================================================
3 . 85396.17 |=================================================================
4 . 84878.46 |================================================================
Nginx
Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 120291.35 |================================================================
2 . 118730.51 |===============================================================
3 . 118800.73 |===============================================================
4 . 119478.96 |================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 27.19 |====================================================================
2 . 26.84 |===================================================================
3 . 27.05 |====================================================================
4 . 27.19 |====================================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 12.26 |===================================================================
2 . 12.28 |===================================================================
3 . 12.42 |====================================================================
4 . 12.27 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 184.05 |==================================================================
2 . 186.37 |===================================================================
3 . 185.14 |===================================================================
4 . 184.58 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 374.9 |===================================================================
2 . 376.5 |===================================================================
3 . 379.3 |====================================================================
4 . 375.0 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 98.40 |===================================================================
2 . 98.61 |===================================================================
3 . 99.50 |====================================================================
4 . 98.71 |===================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 93750.22 |=================================================================
2 . 93578.69 |=================================================================
3 . 93050.59 |=================================================================
4 . 92784.58 |================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 48.39 |====================================================================
2 . 48.65 |====================================================================
3 . 48.21 |===================================================================
4 . 48.48 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 137770 |===================================================================
2 . 136540 |==================================================================
3 . 137070 |===================================================================
4 . 137430 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 52.54 |====================================================================
2 . 52.74 |====================================================================
3 . 52.31 |===================================================================
4 . 52.39 |====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 7.89 |=====================================================================
2 . 7.90 |=====================================================================
3 . 7.85 |=====================================================================
4 . 7.89 |=====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 135490 |===================================================================
2 . 135720 |===================================================================
3 . 135550 |===================================================================
4 . 134940 |===================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 9.71 |=====================================================================
2 . 9.69 |=====================================================================
3 . 9.67 |=====================================================================
4 . 9.66 |=====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 397.8 |====================================================================
2 . 399.8 |====================================================================
3 . 399.8 |====================================================================
4 . 398.7 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 13.67 |====================================================================
2 . 13.73 |====================================================================
3 . 13.67 |====================================================================
4 . 13.71 |====================================================================
Nginx
Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 87947.21 |=================================================================
2 . 87564.69 |=================================================================
3 . 87830.82 |=================================================================
4 . 87800.37 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 47.2 |=====================================================================
2 . 47.4 |=====================================================================
3 . 47.2 |=====================================================================
4 . 47.3 |=====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 5.32 |=====================================================================
2 . 5.34 |=====================================================================
3 . 5.32 |=====================================================================
4 . 5.32 |=====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3741.80 |==================================================================
2 . 3747.71 |==================================================================
3 . 3745.25 |==================================================================
4 . 3737.87 |==================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Exhaustive
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 41.18 |====================================================================
2 . 41.29 |====================================================================
3 . 41.26 |====================================================================
4 . 41.27 |====================================================================
OpenSSL
verify/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 308505.4 |=================================================================
2 . 308603.1 |=================================================================
3 . 308201.8 |=================================================================
4 . 307821.5 |=================================================================
OpenSSL
sign/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 4768.3 |===================================================================
2 . 4768.5 |===================================================================
3 . 4765.9 |===================================================================
4 . 4763.6 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.006 |====================================================================
2 . 0.006 |====================================================================
3 . 0.006 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.002 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
4 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.016 |====================================================================
2 . 0.016 |====================================================================
3 . 0.016 |====================================================================
4 . 0.016 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
4 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.005 |====================================================================
2 . 0.005 |====================================================================
3 . 0.005 |====================================================================
4 . 0.005 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
4 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.013 |====================================================================
2 . 0.013 |====================================================================
3 . 0.013 |====================================================================
4 . 0.013 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.007 |====================================================================
2 . 0.007 |====================================================================
3 . 0.007 |====================================================================
4 . 0.007 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.002 |====================================================================
4 . 0.002 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.004 |====================================================================
2 . 0.004 |====================================================================
3 . 0.004 |====================================================================
4 . 0.004 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
4 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.011 |====================================================================
2 . 0.011 |====================================================================
3 . 0.011 |====================================================================
4 . 0.011 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.002 |====================================================================
2 . 0.002 |====================================================================
3 . 0.002 |====================================================================
4 . 0.002 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
2 . 0.001 |====================================================================
3 . 0.001 |====================================================================
4 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.003 |====================================================================
2 . 0.003 |====================================================================
3 . 0.003 |====================================================================
4 . 0.003 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.001 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 25.20 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 1984 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.226 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 77507 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.193 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 83857 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 100.18 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4991 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 50.54 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4947 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 23.42 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4271 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.552 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 90595 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.381 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 296 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.986 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 507098 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 9.976 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 5012 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.448 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 558384 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.185 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 539716 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.083 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 11985 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.09 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 555122 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.359 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 298 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1038.99 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 481 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 421.93 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 593 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 161.16 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 621 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.029 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 34593 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.918 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 544415 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 78.95 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 633 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.428 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 584739 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.174 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 575743 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.085 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 585591 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.615 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 619 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.028 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 35711 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better