3800XT October Tests for a future article. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core testing with a MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.MS BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4650 on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.MS BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 128GB INTEL SSDPEKKW128G7, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4650, Audio: AMD RV710/730, Network: Intel I211 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.MS BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 128GB INTEL SSDPEKKW128G7, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4650, Audio: AMD RV710/730, Network: Intel I211 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2495.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 2473.0 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3562.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 3576.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 442.7 |================================================================== 2 . 453.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3686.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 3671.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 29.4 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3351.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 3328.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 253.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 252.9 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3832.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 3788.4 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 262.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 266.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3944.3 |================================================================== 2 . 3994.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.5 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3364.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 3357.6 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.90 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.86 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.90 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.75 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.93 |============================================================== 2 . 31.71 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 38.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 38.20 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 42.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.47 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.10 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.15 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.28 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.29 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 17.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 18.01 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 72.79 |================================================================= 2 . 75.64 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 94.4 |===================================================================== 2 . 89.8 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 108.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 100.87 |============================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.11 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.16 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 40.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 40.71 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 18.40 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.31 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 32.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.25 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 76.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 76.71 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 138.76 |=================================================================== 2 . 137.43 |================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2499.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 2484.1 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 160554.8 |================================================================= 2 . 160869.7 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.7335 |================================================================== 2 . 4.8133 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.6241 |=================================================================== 2 . 8.6398 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 78.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.90 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.028 |=================================================================== 2 . 9.910 |================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 12.32 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.40 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.41 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.61 |==================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 84.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 75.74 |============================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.118 |================================================================== 2 . 0.122 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.013 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.233 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.235 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.044 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.044 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.809 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.790 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.013 |=============================================================== 2 . 0.014 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.056 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.057 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.055 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.056 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.118 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.117 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.055 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.056 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.241 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.241 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.224 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.220 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.031 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.995 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.290 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.289 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.584 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.593 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.469 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.463 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.515 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.475 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.019 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.072 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.072 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.036 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.036 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.106 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.106 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.068 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.069 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.076 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.077 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.363 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.357 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.305 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.297 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.433 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.456 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.089 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.089 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.331 |================================================================== 2 . 0.343 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.280 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.286 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.292 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.254 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.020 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.360 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.361 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.088 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.082 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.534 |================================================================ 2 . 1.636 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.011 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.011 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.035 |========================================================= 2 . 0.042 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.106 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.106 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 141572 |=================================================================== 2 . 141012 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 83425 |=============================================================== 2 . 90648 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7015 |======================================================= 2 . 8752 |=====================================================================