3600XT October AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core testing with a MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB CT500P2SSD8, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: MX279, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB CT500P2SSD8, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: MX279, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB CT500P2SSD8, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: MX279, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3985.7 |================================================================== B . 4065.3 |=================================================================== C . 4045.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 543.5 |==================================================================== B . 546.2 |==================================================================== C . 505.6 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3595.0 |=================================================================== B . 3612.8 |=================================================================== C . 3601.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 30.4 |===================================================================== B . 30.1 |==================================================================== C . 30.4 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3290.3 |================================================================== B . 3326.4 |================================================================== C . 3363.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 388.0 |==================================================================== B . 390.0 |==================================================================== C . 384.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3731.4 |=================================================================== B . 3740.2 |=================================================================== C . 3748.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 385.7 |==================================================================== B . 385.3 |==================================================================== C . 387.2 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3901.4 |=================================================================== B . 3905.7 |=================================================================== C . 3889.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 13.2 |===================================================================== B . 13.2 |===================================================================== C . 13.2 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3428.3 |=================================================================== B . 3386.1 |================================================================== C . 3398.6 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 531.52 |================================================================== B . 536.31 |=================================================================== C . 535.97 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 156.14 |=================================================================== B . 155.97 |=================================================================== C . 156.14 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 495.15 |=================================================================== B . 495.83 |=================================================================== C . 495.08 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better A . 409.06 |=================================================================== B . 408.15 |=================================================================== C . 407.97 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.1 |====================================================================== B . 0.1 |====================================================================== C . 0.1 |====================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.42 |==================================================================== B . 3.46 |===================================================================== C . 3.46 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.00 |==================================================================== B . 8.15 |===================================================================== C . 8.11 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.10 |===================================================================== B . 7.07 |===================================================================== C . 7.10 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 31.95 |=================================================================== B . 32.25 |==================================================================== C . 32.38 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 43.60 |==================================================================== B . 43.73 |==================================================================== C . 43.74 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 47.66 |==================================================================== B . 47.79 |==================================================================== C . 47.42 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.24 |===================================================================== B . 0.24 |===================================================================== C . 0.24 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.96 |===================================================================== B . 7.98 |===================================================================== C . 7.98 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.01 |===================================================================== B . 6.96 |===================================================================== C . 6.98 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 21.04 |=================================================================== B . 21.27 |==================================================================== C . 21.16 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 108.19 |=================================================================== B . 108.11 |=================================================================== C . 108.13 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 133.50 |================================================================== B . 134.03 |=================================================================== C . 134.51 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 142.87 |=================================================================== B . 142.14 |================================================================== C . 143.59 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.79 |===================================================================== B . 5.80 |===================================================================== C . 5.80 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.81 |===================================================================== B . 5.83 |===================================================================== C . 5.83 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 27.26 |==================================================================== B . 27.29 |==================================================================== C . 27.46 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 28.09 |==================================================================== B . 28.17 |==================================================================== C . 28.27 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 13.62 |==================================================================== B . 13.66 |==================================================================== C . 13.69 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 23.67 |==================================================================== B . 23.70 |==================================================================== C . 23.68 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 57.43 |=================================================================== B . 57.71 |==================================================================== C . 58.02 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 100.54 |=================================================================== B . 100.64 |=================================================================== C . 100.70 |=================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 1802.2 |=================================================================== B . 1800.9 |=================================================================== C . 1802.5 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 115623.7 |================================================================= B . 115525.6 |================================================================= C . 115794.6 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.2901 |================================================================= B . 5.4401 |=================================================================== C . 5.3883 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.98 |==================================================================== B . 11.99 |==================================================================== C . 11.99 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 110.07 |=================================================================== B . 110.06 |=================================================================== C . 109.96 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.151 |==================================================================== B . 8.130 |==================================================================== C . 8.168 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.76 |==================================================================== B . 10.80 |==================================================================== C . 10.81 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.29 |==================================================================== B . 11.27 |==================================================================== C . 11.24 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.40 |==================================================================== B . 13.34 |==================================================================== C . 13.41 |==================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1259449.88 |============================================================== B . 1270002.50 |=============================================================== C . 1278284.00 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1260557.12 |=============================================================== B . 1245803.38 |============================================================== C . 1243793.00 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1046176.19 |=============================================================== B . 686061.69 |========================================= C . 680085.02 |========================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 991308.92 |================================================================ B . 664420.07 |=========================================== C . 686032.21 |============================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 779640.93 |================================================================ B . 757510.89 |============================================================== C . 744172.61 |============================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 99071.85 |=============================================================== B . 100944.78 |================================================================ C . 100716.58 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 95057.55 |================================================================= B . 95468.46 |================================================================= C . 95479.74 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 86531.33 |=============================================================== B . 89041.01 |================================================================= C . 88334.78 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 77515.49 |================================================================= B . 77146.15 |================================================================= C . 76596.60 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 73483.60 |================================================================ B . 54631.79 |================================================ C . 74400.96 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 72607.45 |================================================================= B . 73108.26 |================================================================= C . 72850.95 |================================================================= RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 57.33 |================================================================ B . 60.59 |==================================================================== C . 60.05 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |================================================================ B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.067 |==================================================================== B . 0.064 |================================================================= C . 0.064 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.012 |=============================================================== C . 0.012 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.201 |==================================================================== B . 0.200 |=================================================================== C . 0.202 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.045 |=================================================================== B . 0.041 |============================================================= C . 0.046 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.819 |==================================================================== B . 0.819 |==================================================================== C . 0.815 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.03 |===================================================================== B . 0.03 |===================================================================== C . 0.03 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.060 |=================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.055 |================================================================== B . 0.057 |==================================================================== C . 0.057 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.125 |=================================================================== B . 0.125 |=================================================================== C . 0.126 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.023 |================================================================= B . 0.024 |==================================================================== C . 0.023 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.033 |================================================================== B . 0.033 |================================================================== C . 0.034 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.027 |==================================================================== B . 0.026 |================================================================= C . 0.027 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.049 |==================================================================== B . 0.048 |=================================================================== C . 0.048 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.062 |==================================================================== B . 0.062 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.273 |================================================================== B . 0.280 |==================================================================== C . 0.273 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.240 |================================================================== B . 0.247 |==================================================================== C . 0.244 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.168 |==================================================================== B . 1.146 |=================================================================== C . 1.160 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.289 |=================================================================== B . 0.291 |==================================================================== C . 0.292 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.615 |==================================================================== B . 0.612 |==================================================================== C . 0.615 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.491 |==================================================================== B . 1.487 |==================================================================== C . 1.486 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.582 |=================================================================== B . 2.606 |==================================================================== C . 2.607 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |================================================================ B . 0.017 |==================================================================== C . 0.017 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.075 |==================================================================== B . 0.073 |================================================================== C . 0.075 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.039 |==================================================================== B . 0.038 |================================================================== C . 0.038 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.109 |================================================================== B . 0.112 |==================================================================== C . 0.109 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.070 |=================================================================== B . 0.071 |==================================================================== C . 0.071 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.079 |=================================================================== B . 0.080 |==================================================================== C . 0.080 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.374 |==================================================================== B . 0.375 |==================================================================== C . 0.374 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.310 |=================================================================== B . 0.313 |==================================================================== C . 0.315 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.561 |==================================================================== B . 1.563 |==================================================================== C . 1.557 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.09 |===================================================================== B . 0.09 |===================================================================== C . 0.09 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.359 |==================================================================== B . 0.351 |================================================================== C . 0.350 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.290 |================================================================== B . 0.299 |==================================================================== C . 0.291 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.347 |==================================================================== B . 1.322 |=================================================================== C . 1.322 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |==================================================================== B . 0.021 |==================================================================== C . 0.021 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.382 |==================================================================== B . 0.379 |=================================================================== C . 0.382 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.096 |==================================================================== B . 0.092 |================================================================= C . 0.089 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.672 |=================================================================== B . 1.703 |==================================================================== C . 1.644 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.030 |================================================================== B . 0.031 |==================================================================== C . 0.031 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.128 |==================================================================== B . 0.128 |==================================================================== C . 0.124 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 116622 |================================================================== B . 117830 |================================================================== C . 118965 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 66820 |==================================================================== B . 63303 |================================================================ C . 61591 |=============================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 12432 |================================================================ B . 12300 |================================================================ C . 13144 |====================================================================