ARMv8 October Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 testing with a WIWYNN Mt.Jade (2.03.20210719 SCP: BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.00GHz (256 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (2.03.20210719 SCP: BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (aarch64), Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.00GHz (256 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (2.03.20210719 SCP: BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (aarch64), Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.00GHz (256 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (2.03.20210719 SCP: BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (aarch64), Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 CC: Processor: Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.00GHz (256 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (2.03.20210719 SCP: BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (aarch64), Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 98786.64 |================================================================ B . 99727.00 |================================================================= C . 99548.97 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 17166.70 |================================================================ B . 17520.69 |================================================================= C . 16439.79 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 10007.42 |================================================================= B . 9087.80 |=========================================================== C . 8240.11 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 10575.60 |================================================================= B . 10565.23 |================================================================= C . 10553.01 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 57634.78 |============================================================== B . 57130.18 |============================================================= C . 60621.45 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 1588.85 |================================================================ B . 1558.41 |=============================================================== C . 1638.76 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 73225.08 |================================================================= B . 72851.58 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 71089.55 |================================================================= B . 70754.73 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 35576.59 |================================================================= B . 35548.46 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 38040.35 |================================================================= B . 38152.87 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 1.81 |=================================================================== B .. 1.84 |==================================================================== CC . 1.77 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 4.65 |==================================================================== B .. 4.56 |=================================================================== CC . 4.55 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 5.19 |==================================================================== B .. 5.17 |==================================================================== CC . 5.04 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 33.21 |=================================================================== B .. 33.43 |=================================================================== CC . 33.07 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 38.62 |=================================================================== B .. 37.91 |================================================================== CC . 38.60 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 42.39 |=================================================================== B .. 42.35 |=================================================================== CC . 42.51 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 2.66 |==================================================================== B .. 2.65 |==================================================================== CC . 2.66 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 1.69 |==================================================================== B .. 1.69 |==================================================================== CC . 1.69 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 12.43 |=================================================================== B .. 12.43 |=================================================================== CC . 12.18 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 81.43 |=================================================================== B .. 81.32 |=================================================================== CC . 81.37 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 87.84 |=================================================================== B .. 87.49 |=================================================================== CC . 87.64 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 102.82 |================================================================== B .. 102.10 |================================================================== CC . 100.64 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 141.03 |================================================================ B .. 133.16 |============================================================ CC . 145.42 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 282.68 |=============================================================== B .. 287.13 |================================================================ CC . 297.70 |================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A .. 12626.0 |================================================================= B .. 12630.1 |================================================================= CC . 12626.1 |================================================================= OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A .. 844167.5 |================================================================ B .. 844356.0 |================================================================ CC . 844095.2 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 944266 |================================================================== B .. 852675 |============================================================ CC . 907782 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.106 |============================================================= B .. 0.117 |=================================================================== CC . 0.110 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 1076005 |================================================================= B .. 1056605 |================================================================ CC . 1061579 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.232 |================================================================== B .. 0.237 |=================================================================== CC . 0.235 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 879173 |================================================================= B .. 893600 |================================================================== CC . 897203 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.569 |=================================================================== B .. 0.560 |================================================================== CC . 0.557 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 1970 |==================================================================== B .. 1594 |======================================================= CC . 1754 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 50.76 |====================================================== B .. 62.74 |=================================================================== CC . 57.02 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 1011 |==================================================================== B .. 1010 |==================================================================== CC . 1013 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 247.36 |================================================================== B .. 247.64 |================================================================== CC . 246.84 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 533 |============================================================ B .. 617 |===================================================================== CC . 455 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 937.22 |======================================================= B .. 810.72 |================================================ CC . 1098.39 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 951593 |================================================================= B .. 884621 |============================================================ CC . 969930 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.105 |============================================================== B .. 0.113 |=================================================================== CC . 0.103 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 881694 |============================================================= B .. 952948 |================================================================== CC . 924309 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.284 |=================================================================== B .. 0.262 |============================================================== CC . 0.270 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 862604 |================================================================ B .. 880389 |================================================================= CC . 895713 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.580 |=================================================================== B .. 0.568 |================================================================== CC . 0.558 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 42531 |=================================================================== B .. 42637 |=================================================================== CC . 41606 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 2.351 |================================================================== B .. 2.345 |================================================================= CC . 2.403 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 31001 |=================================================================== B .. 30569 |================================================================== CC . 31129 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 8.064 |================================================================== B .. 8.178 |=================================================================== CC . 8.031 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 28527 |================================================================== B .. 28428 |================================================================== CC . 28761 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 17.53 |=================================================================== B .. 17.59 |=================================================================== CC . 17.39 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 562471 |========================================================== B .. 606044 |============================================================== CC . 641321 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.178 |=================================================================== B .. 0.165 |============================================================== CC . 0.156 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 307852 |========================================================== B .. 331898 |=============================================================== CC . 349608 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 0.812 |=================================================================== B .. 0.753 |============================================================== CC . 0.715 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 260196 |============================================================= B .. 259658 |============================================================ CC . 283566 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 1.922 |=================================================================== B .. 1.926 |=================================================================== CC . 1.763 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 34060 |================================================================= B .. 34887 |=================================================================== CC . 33090 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 2.936 |================================================================= B .. 2.866 |================================================================ CC . 3.022 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 31648 |=================================================================== B .. 30453 |================================================================ CC . 29227 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 7.900 |============================================================== B .. 8.209 |================================================================ CC . 8.554 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A .. 24127 |================================================================= B .. 24355 |================================================================== CC . 24904 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A .. 20.72 |=================================================================== B .. 20.53 |================================================================== CC . 20.08 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 5.1858 |================================================================= B .. 5.2237 |================================================================== CC . 5.2456 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 6.9595 |================================================================ B .. 7.0032 |================================================================= CC . 7.1308 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 9.6890 |================================================================== B .. 9.6871 |================================================================== CC . 9.6928 |================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 13.06 |================================================================ B .. 13.05 |================================================================ CC . 13.73 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 21.05 |=================================================================== B .. 21.12 |=================================================================== CC . 21.14 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 24.50 |============================================================ B .. 24.95 |============================================================= CC . 27.51 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A .. 35.75 |=================================================================== B .. 33.28 |============================================================== CC . 33.14 |============================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 89311.83 |================================================== B .. 89425.69 |================================================== CC . 112888.82 |=============================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 62930.07 |============================================================= B .. 64883.65 |=============================================================== CC . 65701.98 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 15380.54 |================================================================ B .. 13957.16 |========================================================== CC . 13763.56 |========================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 9941.57 |================================================================= B .. 9170.96 |============================================================ CC . 8425.05 |======================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.036 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.06 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.127 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.229 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.486 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.987 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.278 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.919 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A .. 469372 |===================================================== B .. 540605 |============================================================= CC . 587928 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A .. 53845 |=================================================================== B .. 45123 |======================================================== CC . 40461 |==================================================