EPYC 7763 Okt 2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core testing with a AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1001D BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1001D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.14.0-rc7-amd-pstate-phx (x86_64) 20210909, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1001D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.14.0-rc7-amd-pstate-phx (x86_64) 20210909, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 65938 |==================================================================== B . 30758 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.517 |================================ B . 3.251 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1410688 |================================================================== B . 814240 |====================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.071 |======================================= B . 0.123 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1643553 |================================================================== B . 1082624 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |============================================= B . 0.092 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.114 |========================================================== B . 0.134 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 27.96 |========================================================== B . 32.85 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 3576 |===================================================================== B . 3045 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 31065 |==================================================================== B . 26525 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 8.048 |========================================================== B . 9.425 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2183429 |================================================================== B . 1867623 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2252892 |================================================================== B . 1929606 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.222 |========================================================== B . 0.259 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 116.17 |=================================================================== B . 100.79 |========================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 93240 |==================================================================== B . 81270 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2117465 |================================================================== B . 1848622 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.236 |=========================================================== B . 0.270 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 7015370 |================================================================== B . 6174500 |========================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.017 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 194.42 |=================================================================== B . 172.26 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1286 |============================================================= B . 1451 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.120 |============================================================ B . 0.135 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2076011 |================================================================== B . 1856269 |=========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 26.67 |==================================================================== B . 24.40 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.011 |============================================================== B . 0.012 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 32.9 |=============================================================== B . 35.8 |===================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 89.66 |==================================================================== B . 82.56 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.690 |==================================================================== B . 0.636 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 552 |================================================================== B . 588 |====================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.90 |================================================================= B . 9.48 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 905.19 |=================================================================== B . 850.89 |=============================================================== Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16360.11 |============================================================== B . 17126.30 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.131 |================================================================= B . 0.137 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 2950.39 |================================================================== B . 2846.90 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 52.18 |================================================================== B . 54.03 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.121 |==================================================================== B . 0.117 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 187.52 |================================================================= B . 193.88 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.205 |==================================================================== B . 0.199 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 10.53 |================================================================== B . 10.84 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1258760 |================================================================== B . 1223070 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 75.8 |=================================================================== B . 78.0 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.62 |==================================================================== B . 21.03 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 23129 |================================================================== B . 23778 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.076 |==================================================================== B . 0.074 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 58.7 |===================================================================== B . 57.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3595.5 |=================================================================== B . 3505.1 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3161.8 |=================================================================== B . 3087.5 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.135 |==================================================================== B . 0.132 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 2956780 |================================================================== B . 2891680 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.094 |=================================================================== B . 0.096 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 126.62 |================================================================== B . 129.18 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.155 |==================================================================== B . 0.152 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.055 |==================================================================== B . 0.054 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 30.95 |==================================================================== B . 30.39 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 5851.51 |================================================================= B . 5951.09 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.586 |=================================================================== B . 1.609 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 228.09 |=================================================================== B . 225.16 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.081 |=================================================================== B . 0.082 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.61 |==================================================================== B . 16.42 |=================================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 169586.09 |================================================================ B . 167750.75 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 10280 |=================================================================== B . 10390 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1005410 |================================================================= B . 1016070 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.572 |==================================================================== B . 0.566 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 3063.15 |================================================================== B . 3033.19 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.97 |==================================================================== B . 21.76 |=================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 28453.8 |================================================================== B . 28185.5 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.40 |===================================================================== B . 5.35 |==================================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 183661.57 |================================================================ B . 181976.71 |=============================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.55 |==================================================================== B . 13.44 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.373 |=================================================================== B . 0.376 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.430 |==================================================================== B . 1.419 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 98.46 |=================================================================== B . 99.22 |==================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 182.05 |================================================================== B . 183.42 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.339 |==================================================================== B . 2.356 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 60.14 |==================================================================== B . 60.57 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 24160 |==================================================================== B . 24330 |==================================================================== Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 39350.55 |================================================================= B . 39598.78 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 88.50 |==================================================================== B . 89.05 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 321850 |=================================================================== B . 323810 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.28 |===================================================================== B . 8.33 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3330.1 |=================================================================== B . 3310.6 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.343 |==================================================================== B . 0.345 |==================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 1842542.7 |================================================================ B . 1832365.1 |================================================================ Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 89.49 |==================================================================== B . 89.00 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2741.9 |=================================================================== B . 2756.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 317.9 |==================================================================== B . 316.3 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.140 |==================================================================== B . 1.145 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 30.72 |==================================================================== B . 30.59 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 6301.8 |=================================================================== B . 6326.4 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.5361 |=================================================================== B . 5.5574 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3038.5 |=================================================================== B . 3027.4 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 143.49 |=================================================================== B . 143.98 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 288.1 |==================================================================== B . 289.0 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.340 |==================================================================== B . 0.341 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 49.01 |==================================================================== B . 48.87 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.375 |==================================================================== B . 0.374 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.53 |===================================================================== B . 7.51 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.9083 |=================================================================== B . 5.8966 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 40.61 |==================================================================== B . 40.55 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.844 |==================================================================== B . 9.833 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.2684 |=================================================================== B . 4.2718 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better B . 3133.5 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.032 |==================================================================== B . 0.032 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.026 |==================================================================== B . 0.026 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.573 |==================================================================== B . 1.573 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.023 |==================================================================== B . 0.023 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.02 |===================================================================== B . 0.02 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.268 |==================================================================== B . 0.268 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.067 |==================================================================== B . 0.067 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.023 |==================================================================== B . 0.023 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.074 |==================================================================== B . 0.074 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.034 |==================================================================== B . 0.034 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== B . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.06 |===================================================================== B . 0.06 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.35 |===================================================================== B . 0.35 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.19 |===================================================================== B . 0.19 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better