fri whiskey Intel Core i7-8565U testing with a Dell 0KTW76 (1.11.0 BIOS) and Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0KTW76 (1.11.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.0-devel (git-0aab06e 2021-07-05 hirsute-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0KTW76 (1.11.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.0-devel (git-0aab06e 2021-07-05 hirsute-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0KTW76 (1.11.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.0-devel (git-0aab06e 2021-07-05 hirsute-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 930.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 928.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 941.2 |==================================================================== 3 . 892.9 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 128.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 128.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 129.4 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2745.6 |================================================================== 2 . 2759.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2770.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.6 |===================================================================== 3 . 11.4 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2361.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2374.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 2347.0 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 318.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 320.2 |==================================================================== 3 . 316.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2819.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2825.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 2812.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 162.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 164.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 162.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2919.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 2922.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 2914.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.40 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.23 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.15 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2380.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2391.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 2356.7 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.38 |================================================================= 2 . 4.10 |============================================================= 3 . 4.65 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.70 |================================================================= 2 . 2.47 |============================================================ 3 . 2.85 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 12.98 |==================================================== 2 . 13.90 |======================================================== 3 . 16.93 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 19.60 |============================================================== 2 . 20.29 |================================================================= 3 . 21.35 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.33 |======================================================= 2 . 24.42 |============================================================ 3 . 27.78 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.17 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.89 |================================================================= 3 . 5.17 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.75 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.90 |======================================================== 3 . 9.25 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 51.23 |================================================================ 2 . 54.62 |==================================================================== 3 . 50.07 |============================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 65.57 |========================================================= 2 . 77.60 |==================================================================== 3 . 67.32 |=========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 75.39 |============================================================ 2 . 85.65 |==================================================================== 3 . 76.72 |============================================================= OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 878.8 |================================================================ 2 . 927.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 875.9 |================================================================ OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45734.6 |===================================================== 2 . 57037.8 |================================================================== 3 . 45947.9 |===================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 11.63 |================================================================= 3 . 12.20 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.54 |================================================================== 2 . 13.79 |=================================================================== 3 . 13.92 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.19 |=================================================================== 2 . 14.26 |=================================================================== 3 . 14.40 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.19 |================================================================= 2 . 17.08 |================================================================ 3 . 18.09 |==================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 69.93 |========================================================== 2 . 70.30 |========================================================== 3 . 82.22 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.019 |================================================================= 2 . 0.018 |============================================================= 3 . 0.020 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.062 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.062 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.016 |================================================================ 2 . 0.016 |================================================================ 3 . 0.017 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.290 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.289 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.288 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.064 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.064 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.065 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.243 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.230 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.244 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.042 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.042 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.041 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.082 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.082 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.082 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.094 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.094 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.095 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.165 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.164 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.165 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.028 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.028 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.030 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.029 |================================================================== 3 . 0.029 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.043 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.043 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.043 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.033 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.033 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.033 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.063 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.063 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.064 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.063 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.374 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.375 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.375 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.250 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.250 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.250 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.554 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.547 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.553 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.435 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.435 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.432 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.825 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.823 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.829 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.958 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.947 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.974 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.325 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.349 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.345 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.023 |================================================================= 3 . 0.023 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.021 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.108 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.109 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.108 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.046 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.045 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.046 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.136 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.136 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.136 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |========================================================= 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |========================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.101 |================================================================== 2 . 0.102 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.104 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.089 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.088 |================================================================== 3 . 0.090 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.505 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.508 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.507 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.351 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.350 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.353 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.158 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.113 |================================================================== 3 . 2.164 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.1 |====================================================================== 2 . 0.1 |====================================================================== 3 . 0.1 |====================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.455 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.454 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.454 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.313 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.313 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.313 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.704 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.704 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.705 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.023 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.523 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.528 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.534 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.105 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.107 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.103 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.280 |================================================================== 2 . 2.298 |================================================================== 3 . 2.361 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.034 |================================================================== 2 . 0.034 |================================================================== 3 . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.154 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.157 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.154 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 329640 |================================================================ 2 . 343047 |=================================================================== 3 . 206939 |======================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 101170 |================================================================== 2 . 103421 |=================================================================== 3 . 86946 |======================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 61390 |=================================================== 2 . 82505 |==================================================================== 3 . 62582 |==================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 . 2669.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 2683.4 |===================================================================