centos79-1006-311

centos79-1006-311

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110188-IB-CENTOS79154
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
October 06 2021
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


centos79-1006-311OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores)Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS)Intel 440BX/ZX/DX1 x 4096 MB DRAM223GB Virtual disk + 84GB Virtual diskVMware SVGA IIVMware VMXNET3CentOS 7.9.20093.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)X ServerGCC 4.8.5 20150623xfs1176x885VMwareProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSystem LayerCentos79-1006-311 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: always- --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - NOOP / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - CPU Microcode: 0x5003003- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_302-b08)- itlb_multihit: vulnerable + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT Host state unknown + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Vulnerable: Retpoline without IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

centos79-1006-311cassandra: Writescouchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24hbase: Increment - 1hbase: Increment - 1hbase: Increment - 4hbase: Increment - 4hbase: Increment - 16hbase: Increment - 16hbase: Rand Read - 1hbase: Rand Read - 1hbase: Rand Read - 4hbase: Rand Read - 4hbase: Rand Read - 16hbase: Rand Read - 16hbase: Rand Write - 1hbase: Rand Write - 1hbase: Rand Write - 4hbase: Rand Write - 4hbase: Rand Write - 16hbase: Rand Write - 16hbase: Seq Read - 1hbase: Seq Read - 1hbase: Seq Read - 4hbase: Seq Read - 4hbase: Seq Read - 16hbase: Seq Read - 16hbase: Seq Write - 1hbase: Seq Write - 1hbase: Seq Write - 4hbase: Seq Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Read - 1hbase: Async Rand Read - 1hbase: Async Rand Read - 4hbase: Async Rand Read - 4hbase: Seq Write - 16hbase: Seq Write - 16hbase: Async Rand Read - 16hbase: Async Rand Read - 16hbase: Async Rand Write - 1hbase: Async Rand Write - 1hbase: Async Rand Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Write - 16hbase: Async Rand Write - 16apache: 1apache: 20apache: 100apache: 200apache: 500apache: 1000apache-siege: 200apache-siege: 250blogbench: Readblogbench: Writeebizzy: influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000leveldb: Hot Readleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Readleveldb: Seek Randleveldb: Rand Deleteleveldb: Seq Fillleveldb: Seq Fillmysqlslap: 1mysqlslap: 8mysqlslap: 16mysqlslap: 32mysqlslap: 64mysqlslap: 128mysqlslap: 256mysqlslap: 512mysqlslap: 1024mysqlslap: 2048mysqlslap: 4096memtier-benchmark: Redisnginx: 1nginx: 20nginx: 100nginx: 200nginx: 500nginx: 1000openssl: SHA256openssl: RSA4096openssl: RSA4096perl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpreterphp: Zend benchphp: Zend micro_benchphpbench: PHP Benchmark Suitepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencysqlite: 1sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38717136.3855575178810549269603362842511819116208250636364657721498968050804323850811715304260195558165340018568497072531367763514551342884210380632343085304753672223787342.3812889.8813664.1613297.5912807.8611398.269771.409592.9954163094573144403800.1399839.11401.91.0720.21090.68925.18.55924.38.9711.0372.0248.75231.96.883294317161158808388203154611415151314620.8361231.0799340.4499266.8098472.5688781.8783529.04529762627295.219022.10.164048840.002013621.5567.377170696187540.05313030.768369881.352355842.812306988.157130439.2162473620.233164370.061104896.996514493.1812751824.49210880.920308771.62010310.970299543.344258909.657394812.6671692529.5674392.579114874.93182898.000400524.967326976.4882489200.996113259.3971076524.554314216.0511114644.868243818.2722510002.786296433.736271592.2352310217.2176075845.27318345089.0195361656.55922802369.87512199870.66136891588.07781367267.67217.039113.799OpenBenchmarking.org

Apache Cassandra

This is a benchmark of the Apache Cassandra NoSQL database management system making use of cassandra-stress. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: WritesVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 37.22, N = 38717

Apache CouchDB

This is a bulk insertion benchmark of Apache CouchDB. CouchDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database implemented in Erlang. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.1.1Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 3136.39

Apache HBase

This is a benchmark of the Apache HBase non-relational distributed database system inspired from Google's Bigtable. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312002400360048006000SE +/- 49.75, N = 35575

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 1.53, N = 3178

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 97.06, N = 48105

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 5.95, N = 4492

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v315003000450060007500SE +/- 1662.77, N = 56960

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 1221.88, N = 53362

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 86.34, N = 158425

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 1.26, N = 15118

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 188.79, N = 1519116

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350100150200250SE +/- 2.23, N = 15208

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 191.95, N = 1225063

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3140280420560700SE +/- 4.94, N = 12636

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v310K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 1195.47, N = 1546577

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3510152025SE +/- 0.70, N = 1521

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 1220.60, N = 1549896

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 2.13, N = 1580

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 2746.79, N = 1250804

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v370140210280350SE +/- 17.01, N = 12323

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 148.09, N = 158508

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 2.36, N = 15117

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 142.32, N = 1515304

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 2.65, N = 15260

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 215.67, N = 519555

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 8.93, N = 5816

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 1491.94, N = 1553400

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.67, N = 1518

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 1809.09, N = 1556849

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31632486480SE +/- 2.50, N = 1570

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316003200480064008000SE +/- 76.00, N = 157253

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 1.51, N = 15136

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v317003400510068008500SE +/- 63.50, N = 127763

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 4.49, N = 12514

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 523.53, N = 355134

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300288

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v39001800270036004500SE +/- 71.64, N = 94210

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38001600240032004000SE +/- 69.70, N = 93806

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 28.25, N = 153234

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v370140210280350SE +/- 2.83, N = 15308

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311002200330044005500SE +/- 43.78, N = 85304

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3160320480640800SE +/- 6.45, N = 8753

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v314002800420056007000SE +/- 80.80, N = 36722

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 29.34, N = 32378

Apache HTTP Server

This is a test of the Apache HTTPD web server. This Apache HTTPD web server benchmark test profile makes use of the Golang "Bombardier" program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316003200480064008000SE +/- 22.04, N = 37342.381. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 20Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 60.38, N = 312889.881. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 100Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 94.66, N = 313664.161. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 34.44, N = 313297.591. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 500Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 126.85, N = 312807.861. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 1000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 98.90, N = 311398.261. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache Siege

This is a test of the Apache web server performance being facilitated by the Siege web server benchmark program. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransactions Per Second, More Is BetterApache Siege 2.4.29Concurrent Users: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 89.56, N = 39771.401. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransactions Per Second, More Is BetterApache Siege 2.4.29Concurrent Users: 250Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 135.63, N = 39592.991. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto

BlogBench

BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3120K240K360K480K600KSE +/- 5283.87, N = 95416301. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 16.50, N = 39451. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread

ebizzy

This is a test of ebizzy, a program to generate workloads resembling web server workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316K32K48K64K80KSE +/- 1499.38, N = 15731441. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native

InfluxDB

This is a benchmark of the InfluxDB open-source time-series database optimized for fast, high-availability storage for IoT and other use-cases. The InfluxDB test profile makes use of InfluxDB Inch for facilitating the benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v390K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 673.15, N = 3403800.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v390K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 612.09, N = 3399839.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 548.55, N = 21401.9

LevelDB

LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Hot ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.24120.48240.72360.96481.206SE +/- 0.014, N = 31.0721. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill SyncVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.0450.090.1350.180.225SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.21. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill SyncVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 11.01, N = 31090.691. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: OverwriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.35, N = 325.11. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: OverwriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.082, N = 38.5591. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.20, N = 1524.31. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.079, N = 158.9711. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.23330.46660.69990.93321.1665SE +/- 0.015, N = 31.0371. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Seek RandomVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.45540.91081.36621.82162.277SE +/- 0.019, N = 32.0241. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random DeleteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.086, N = 158.7521. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3714212835SE +/- 0.29, N = 331.91. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.120, N = 36.8831. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

MariaDB

This is a MariaDB MySQL database server benchmark making use of mysqlslap. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 302.51, N = 1229431. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 8Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3400800120016002000SE +/- 13.79, N = 317161. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 63.58, N = 911581. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 32Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 4.38, N = 38081. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 64Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v380160240320400SE +/- 11.83, N = 93881. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 128Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 0.73, N = 32031. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 256Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.50, N = 31541. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 512Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31428425670SE +/- 0.52, N = 3611. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 1024Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.13, N = 3141. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 2048Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 3151. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.14, N = 3151. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

Memtier_benchmark

Memtier_benchmark is a NoSQL Redis/Memcache traffic generation plus benchmarking tool. This current test profile currently just stresses the Redis protocol and basic options exposed wotj a 1:1 Set/Get ratio, 30 pipeline, 100 clients per thread, and thread count equal to the number of CPU cores/threads present. Patches to extend the test are welcome as always. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemtier_benchmark 1.2.17Protocol: RedisVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 5563.91, N = 31314620.831. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre

nginx

This is a benchmark of the lightweight Nginx HTTP(S) web-server. This Nginx web server benchmark test profile makes use of the Golang "Bombardier" program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v313K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 71.06, N = 361231.071. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 20Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 173.88, N = 399340.441. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 100Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 495.58, N = 399266.801. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 366.77, N = 398472.561. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 500Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1187.52, N = 388781.871. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 1000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 885.14, N = 383529.041. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

OpenSSL

OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA256Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110M220M330M440M550MSE +/- 254199.98, N = 35297626271. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 2.72, N = 3295.21. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 60.11, N = 319022.11. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

Perl Benchmarks

Perl benchmark suite that can be used to compare the relative speed of different versions of perl. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.03690.07380.11070.14760.1845SE +/- 0.00018953, N = 30.16404884

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.00050.0010.00150.0020.0025SE +/- 0.00000663, N = 30.00201362

PHP Micro Benchmarks

Various small PHP micro-benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPHP Micro BenchmarksTest: Zend benchVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.35010.70021.05031.40041.7505SE +/- 0.010, N = 31.556

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPHP Micro BenchmarksTest: Zend micro_benchVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.014, N = 37.377

PHPBench

PHPBench is a benchmark suite for PHP. It performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter. PHPBench can be used to compare hardware, operating systems, PHP versions, PHP accelerators and caches, compiler options, etc. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v340K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 214.76, N = 3170696

PostgreSQL pgbench

This is a benchmark of PostgreSQL using pgbench for facilitating the database benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 54.99, N = 3187541. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.01190.02380.03570.04760.0595SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0531. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 6.45, N = 313031. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.17280.34560.51840.69120.864SE +/- 0.004, N = 30.7681. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 241.71, N = 3369881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.30420.60840.91261.21681.521SE +/- 0.009, N = 31.3521. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 433.93, N = 4355841. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.63271.26541.89812.53083.1635SE +/- 0.035, N = 42.8121. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 364.03, N = 12306981. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.104, N = 128.1571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 53.18, N = 1213041. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3918273645SE +/- 1.97, N = 1239.221. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 228.44, N = 12247361. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3510152025SE +/- 0.19, N = 1220.231. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 211.83, N = 3164371. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.01370.02740.04110.05480.0685SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0611. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 37.22, N = 1210481. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 4.16, N = 1297.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 16.20, N = 125141. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 18.95, N = 12493.181. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 5.27, N = 122751. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3400800120016002000SE +/- 35.47, N = 121824.491. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 14.49, N = 310881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.2070.4140.6210.8281.035SE +/- 0.012, N = 30.9201. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 163.09, N = 3308771. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.36450.7291.09351.4581.8225SE +/- 0.009, N = 31.6201. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 13.06, N = 310311. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.21830.43660.65490.87321.0915SE +/- 0.012, N = 30.9701. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 371.51, N = 12299541. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.75241.50482.25723.00963.762SE +/- 0.044, N = 123.3441. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 195.77, N = 3258901. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.074, N = 39.6571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38001600240032004000SE +/- 39.73, N = 339481. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.13, N = 312.671. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 149.43, N = 12169251. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3714212835SE +/- 0.26, N = 1229.571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3100200300400500SE +/- 36.70, N = 94391. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.58031.16061.74092.32122.9015SE +/- 0.460, N = 92.5791. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1266.24, N = 9114871. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.10952.2193.32854.4385.5475SE +/- 0.663, N = 94.9311. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1666.92, N = 982898.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v39001800270036004500SE +/- 14.84, N = 340051. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.09, N = 324.971. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 11.81, N = 332691. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 376.491. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 24.99, N = 524891. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 2.04, N = 5201.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1078.67, N = 6113251. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 1.210, N = 69.3971. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 805.19, N = 9107651. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 2.24, N = 924.551. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 95.30, N = 931421. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.57, N = 916.051. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 100.58, N = 3111461. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31020304050SE +/- 0.40, N = 344.871. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 5556.30, N = 9243818.271. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 85716.46, N = 32510002.791. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 21.22, N = 329641. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3816243240SE +/- 0.24, N = 333.741. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 39.67, N = 927151. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 1.36, N = 992.241. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 49.10, N = 923101. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350100150200250SE +/- 4.78, N = 9217.221. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MSE +/- 58028.40, N = 36075845.271. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34M8M12M16M20MSE +/- 1955462.36, N = 318345089.021. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5MSE +/- 129311.90, N = 35361656.561. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35M10M15M20M25MSE +/- 449406.91, N = 322802369.881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33M6M9M12M15MSE +/- 202621.46, N = 312199870.661. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 3023518.13, N = 336891588.081. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320M40M60M80M100MSE +/- 1881226.66, N = 381367267.671. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.30.1Threads / Copies: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.81, N = 1217.041. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread

SQLite Speedtest

This is a benchmark of SQLite's speedtest1 benchmark program with an increased problem size of 1,000. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite Speedtest 3.30Timed Time - Size 1,000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.19, N = 3113.801. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread

168 Results Shown

Apache Cassandra
Apache CouchDB
Apache HBase:
  Increment - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Increment - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Increment - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Read - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Read - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Read - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Write - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Write - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Rand Write - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Read - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Read - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Read - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Write - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Write - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Read - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Read - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Seq Write - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Read - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Write - 1:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Write - 4:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
  Async Rand Write - 16:
    Rows Per Second
    Microseconds - Average Latency
Apache HTTP Server:
  1
  20
  100
  200
  500
  1000
Apache Siege:
  200
  250
BlogBench:
  Read
  Write
ebizzy
InfluxDB:
  4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000
  64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000
  1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000
LevelDB:
  Hot Read
  Fill Sync
  Fill Sync
  Overwrite
  Overwrite
  Rand Fill
  Rand Fill
  Rand Read
  Seek Rand
  Rand Delete
  Seq Fill
  Seq Fill
MariaDB:
  1
  8
  16
  32
  64
  128
  256
  512
  1024
  2048
  4096
Memtier_benchmark
nginx:
  1
  20
  100
  200
  500
  1000
OpenSSL:
  SHA256
  RSA4096
  RSA4096
Perl Benchmarks:
  Pod2html
  Interpreter
PHP Micro Benchmarks:
  Zend bench
  Zend micro_bench
PHPBench
PostgreSQL pgbench:
  1 - 1 - Read Only
  1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1 - 1 - Read Write
  1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1 - 50 - Read Only
  1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1 - 100 - Read Only
  1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1 - 250 - Read Only
  1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1 - 50 - Read Write
  1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1 - 500 - Read Only
  1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency
  100 - 1 - Read Only
  100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1 - 100 - Read Write
  1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1 - 250 - Read Write
  1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1 - 500 - Read Write
  1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency
  100 - 1 - Read Write
  100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency
  100 - 50 - Read Only
  100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1000 - 1 - Read Only
  1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency
  100 - 100 - Read Only
  100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency
  100 - 250 - Read Only
  100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency
  100 - 50 - Read Write
  100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency
  100 - 500 - Read Only
  100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1000 - 1 - Read Write
  1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1000 - 50 - Read Only
  1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency
  10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency
  100 - 100 - Read Write
  100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency
  100 - 250 - Read Write
  100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency
  100 - 500 - Read Write
  100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1000 - 100 - Read Only
  1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1000 - 250 - Read Only
  1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1000 - 50 - Read Write
  1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1000 - 500 - Read Only
  1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency
  10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency
  10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency
  1000 - 100 - Read Write
  1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1000 - 250 - Read Write
  1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency
  1000 - 500 - Read Write
  1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency
  10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency
  10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency
  10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency
  10000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency
  10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency
  10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency
  10000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency
SQLite
SQLite Speedtest