centos79-1006-311

centos79-1006-311

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2110188-IB-CENTOS79154.

centos79-1006-311ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSystem LayerVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores)Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS)Intel 440BX/ZX/DX1 x 4096 MB DRAM223GB Virtual disk + 84GB Virtual diskVMware SVGA IIVMware VMXNET3CentOS 7.9.20093.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)X ServerGCC 4.8.5 20150623xfs1176x885VMwareOpenBenchmarking.org- Transparent Huge Pages: always- --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - NOOP / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096- CPU Microcode: 0x5003003- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_302-b08)- itlb_multihit: vulnerable + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT Host state unknown + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Vulnerable: Retpoline without IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

centos79-1006-311leveldb: Hot Readleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Readleveldb: Seek Randleveldb: Rand Deleteleveldb: Seq Fillleveldb: Seq Fillsqlite: 1blogbench: Readblogbench: Writeebizzy: perl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpreteropenssl: SHA256openssl: RSA4096openssl: RSA4096couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24mysqlslap: 1mysqlslap: 8mysqlslap: 16mysqlslap: 32mysqlslap: 64mysqlslap: 128mysqlslap: 256mysqlslap: 512mysqlslap: 1024mysqlslap: 2048mysqlslap: 4096pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencysqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000memtier-benchmark: Rediscassandra: Writesnginx: 1nginx: 20nginx: 100nginx: 200nginx: 500nginx: 1000hbase: Increment - 1hbase: Increment - 1hbase: Increment - 4hbase: Increment - 4hbase: Increment - 16hbase: Increment - 16hbase: Rand Read - 1hbase: Rand Read - 1hbase: Rand Read - 4hbase: Rand Read - 4hbase: Rand Read - 16hbase: Rand Read - 16hbase: Rand Write - 1hbase: Rand Write - 1hbase: Rand Write - 4hbase: Rand Write - 4hbase: Rand Write - 16hbase: Rand Write - 16hbase: Seq Read - 1hbase: Seq Read - 1hbase: Seq Read - 4hbase: Seq Read - 4hbase: Seq Read - 16hbase: Seq Read - 16hbase: Seq Write - 1hbase: Seq Write - 1hbase: Seq Write - 4hbase: Seq Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Read - 1hbase: Async Rand Read - 1hbase: Async Rand Read - 4hbase: Async Rand Read - 4hbase: Seq Write - 16hbase: Seq Write - 16hbase: Async Rand Read - 16hbase: Async Rand Read - 16hbase: Async Rand Write - 1hbase: Async Rand Write - 1hbase: Async Rand Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Write - 4hbase: Async Rand Write - 16hbase: Async Rand Write - 16apache: 1apache: 20apache: 100apache: 200apache: 500apache: 1000apache-siege: 200apache-siege: 250phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suitephp: Zend benchphp: Zend micro_benchinfluxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.0720.21090.68925.18.55924.38.9711.0372.0248.75231.96.88317.039541630945731440.164048840.00201362529762627295.219022.1136.38529431716115880838820315461141515187540.05313030.768369881.352355842.812306988.157130439.2162473620.233164370.061104896.996514493.1812751824.49210880.920308771.62010310.970299543.344258909.657394812.6671692529.5674392.579114874.93182898.000400524.967326976.4882489200.996113259.3971076524.554314216.0511114644.868243818.2722510002.786296433.736271592.2352310217.2176075845.27318345089.0195361656.55922802369.87512199870.66136891588.07781367267.672113.7991314620.83871761231.0799340.4499266.8098472.5688781.8783529.045575178810549269603362842511819116208250636364657721498968050804323850811715304260195558165340018568497072531367763514551342884210380632343085304753672223787342.3812889.8813664.1613297.5912807.8611398.269771.409592.991706961.5567.377403800.1399839.11401.9OpenBenchmarking.org

LevelDB

Benchmark: Hot Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Hot ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.24120.48240.72360.96481.206SE +/- 0.014, N = 31.0721. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Fill Sync

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill SyncVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.0450.090.1350.180.225SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.21. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Fill Sync

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill SyncVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 11.01, N = 31090.691. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Overwrite

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: OverwriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.35, N = 325.11. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Overwrite

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: OverwriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.082, N = 38.5591. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.20, N = 1524.31. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.079, N = 158.9711. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.23330.46660.69990.93321.1665SE +/- 0.015, N = 31.0371. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Seek Random

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Seek RandomVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.45540.91081.36621.82162.277SE +/- 0.019, N = 32.0241. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Delete

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random DeleteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.086, N = 158.7521. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Sequential Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3714212835SE +/- 0.29, N = 331.91. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Sequential Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.120, N = 36.8831. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.30.1Threads / Copies: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.81, N = 1217.041. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread

BlogBench

Test: Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: ReadVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3120K240K360K480K600KSE +/- 5283.87, N = 95416301. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread

BlogBench

Test: Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 16.50, N = 39451. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread

ebizzy

OpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316K32K48K64K80KSE +/- 1499.38, N = 15731441. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native

Perl Benchmarks

Test: Pod2html

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.03690.07380.11070.14760.1845SE +/- 0.00018953, N = 30.16404884

Perl Benchmarks

Test: Interpreter

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.00050.0010.00150.0020.0025SE +/- 0.00000663, N = 30.00201362

OpenSSL

Algorithm: SHA256

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA256Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110M220M330M440M550MSE +/- 254199.98, N = 35297626271. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: RSA4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 2.72, N = 3295.21. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: RSA4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 60.11, N = 319022.11. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

Apache CouchDB

Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.1.1Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 3136.39

MariaDB

Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 302.51, N = 1229431. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 8Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3400800120016002000SE +/- 13.79, N = 317161. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 63.58, N = 911581. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 32Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 4.38, N = 38081. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 64Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v380160240320400SE +/- 11.83, N = 93881. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 128Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 0.73, N = 32031. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 256Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.50, N = 31541. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 512Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31428425670SE +/- 0.52, N = 3611. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 1024Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.13, N = 3141. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 2048

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 2048Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 3151. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 10.6.4Clients: 4096Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.14, N = 3151. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 54.99, N = 3187541. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.01190.02380.03570.04760.0595SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0531. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 6.45, N = 313031. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.17280.34560.51840.69120.864SE +/- 0.004, N = 30.7681. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 241.71, N = 3369881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.30420.60840.91261.21681.521SE +/- 0.009, N = 31.3521. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 433.93, N = 4355841. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.63271.26541.89812.53083.1635SE +/- 0.035, N = 42.8121. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 364.03, N = 12306981. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.104, N = 128.1571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 53.18, N = 1213041. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3918273645SE +/- 1.97, N = 1239.221. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 228.44, N = 12247361. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3510152025SE +/- 0.19, N = 1220.231. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 211.83, N = 3164371. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.01370.02740.04110.05480.0685SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0611. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 37.22, N = 1210481. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 4.16, N = 1297.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 16.20, N = 125141. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 18.95, N = 12493.181. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 5.27, N = 122751. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3400800120016002000SE +/- 35.47, N = 121824.491. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 14.49, N = 310881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.2070.4140.6210.8281.035SE +/- 0.012, N = 30.9201. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 163.09, N = 3308771. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.36450.7291.09351.4581.8225SE +/- 0.009, N = 31.6201. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 13.06, N = 310311. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.21830.43660.65490.87321.0915SE +/- 0.012, N = 30.9701. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 371.51, N = 12299541. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.75241.50482.25723.00963.762SE +/- 0.044, N = 123.3441. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 195.77, N = 3258901. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.074, N = 39.6571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38001600240032004000SE +/- 39.73, N = 339481. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 0.13, N = 312.671. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 149.43, N = 12169251. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3714212835SE +/- 0.26, N = 1229.571. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3100200300400500SE +/- 36.70, N = 94391. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.58031.16061.74092.32122.9015SE +/- 0.460, N = 92.5791. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1266.24, N = 9114871. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.10952.2193.32854.4385.5475SE +/- 0.663, N = 94.9311. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1666.92, N = 982898.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v39001800270036004500SE +/- 14.84, N = 340051. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 0.09, N = 324.971. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 11.81, N = 332691. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 376.491. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 24.99, N = 524891. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 2.04, N = 5201.001. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1078.67, N = 6113251. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33691215SE +/- 1.210, N = 69.3971. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 805.19, N = 9107651. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3612182430SE +/- 2.24, N = 924.551. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 95.30, N = 931421. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.57, N = 916.051. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read OnlyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 100.58, N = 3111461. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31020304050SE +/- 0.40, N = 344.871. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 5556.30, N = 9243818.271. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 85716.46, N = 32510002.791. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 21.22, N = 329641. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3816243240SE +/- 0.24, N = 333.741. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v36001200180024003000SE +/- 39.67, N = 927151. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 1.36, N = 992.241. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read WriteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 49.10, N = 923101. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350100150200250SE +/- 4.78, N = 9217.221. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MSE +/- 58028.40, N = 36075845.271. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34M8M12M16M20MSE +/- 1955462.36, N = 318345089.021. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5MSE +/- 129311.90, N = 35361656.561. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35M10M15M20M25MSE +/- 449406.91, N = 322802369.881. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33M6M9M12M15MSE +/- 202621.46, N = 312199870.661. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 3023518.13, N = 336891588.081. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

PostgreSQL pgbench

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320M40M60M80M100MSE +/- 1881226.66, N = 381367267.671. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm

SQLite Speedtest

Timed Time - Size 1,000

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite Speedtest 3.30Timed Time - Size 1,000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 0.19, N = 3113.801. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread

Memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemtier_benchmark 1.2.17Protocol: RedisVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 5563.91, N = 31314620.831. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Apache Cassandra

Test: Writes

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: WritesVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 37.22, N = 38717

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v313K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 71.06, N = 361231.071. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 20

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 20Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 173.88, N = 399340.441. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 100Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 495.58, N = 399266.801. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 200

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 366.77, N = 398472.561. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 500Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1187.52, N = 388781.871. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

nginx

Concurrent Requests: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.21.1Concurrent Requests: 1000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 885.14, N = 383529.041. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312002400360048006000SE +/- 49.75, N = 35575

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34080120160200SE +/- 1.53, N = 3178

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 97.06, N = 48105

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 5.95, N = 4492

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v315003000450060007500SE +/- 1662.77, N = 56960

Apache HBase

Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Increment - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 1221.88, N = 53362

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 86.34, N = 158425

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 1.26, N = 15118

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 188.79, N = 1519116

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v350100150200250SE +/- 2.23, N = 15208

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 191.95, N = 1225063

Apache HBase

Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3140280420560700SE +/- 4.94, N = 12636

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v310K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 1195.47, N = 1546577

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3510152025SE +/- 0.70, N = 1521

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 1220.60, N = 1549896

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v320406080100SE +/- 2.13, N = 1580

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 2746.79, N = 1250804

Apache HBase

Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v370140210280350SE +/- 17.01, N = 12323

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 148.09, N = 158508

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 2.36, N = 15117

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 142.32, N = 1515304

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300SE +/- 2.65, N = 15260

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v34K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 215.67, N = 519555

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32004006008001000SE +/- 8.93, N = 5816

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 1491.94, N = 1553400

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v348121620SE +/- 0.67, N = 1518

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 1809.09, N = 1556849

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31632486480SE +/- 2.50, N = 1570

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316003200480064008000SE +/- 76.00, N = 157253

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3306090120150SE +/- 1.51, N = 15136

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v317003400510068008500SE +/- 63.50, N = 127763

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3110220330440550SE +/- 4.49, N = 12514

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v312K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 523.53, N = 355134

Apache HBase

Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v360120180240300288

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v39001800270036004500SE +/- 71.64, N = 94210

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v38001600240032004000SE +/- 69.70, N = 93806

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v37001400210028003500SE +/- 28.25, N = 153234

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v370140210280350SE +/- 2.83, N = 15308

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v311002200330044005500SE +/- 43.78, N = 85304

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3160320480640800SE +/- 6.45, N = 8753

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v314002800420056007000SE +/- 80.80, N = 36722

Apache HBase

Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.2.3Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v35001000150020002500SE +/- 29.34, N = 32378

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 1Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v316003200480064008000SE +/- 22.04, N = 37342.381. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 20

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 20Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 60.38, N = 312889.881. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 100Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 94.66, N = 313664.161. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 200

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 34.44, N = 313297.591. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 500Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v33K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 126.85, N = 312807.861. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.48Concurrent Requests: 1000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 98.90, N = 311398.261. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

Apache Siege

Concurrent Users: 200

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransactions Per Second, More Is BetterApache Siege 2.4.29Concurrent Users: 200Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 89.56, N = 39771.401. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto

Apache Siege

Concurrent Users: 250

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransactions Per Second, More Is BetterApache Siege 2.4.29Concurrent Users: 250Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 135.63, N = 39592.991. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto

PHPBench

PHP Benchmark Suite

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v340K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 214.76, N = 3170696

PHP Micro Benchmarks

Test: Zend bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPHP Micro BenchmarksTest: Zend benchVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v30.35010.70021.05031.40041.7505SE +/- 0.010, N = 31.556

PHP Micro Benchmarks

Test: Zend micro_bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPHP Micro BenchmarksTest: Zend micro_benchVirtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3246810SE +/- 0.014, N = 37.377

InfluxDB

Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v390K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 673.15, N = 3403800.1

InfluxDB

Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v390K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 612.09, N = 3399839.1

InfluxDB

Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000

OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v330060090012001500SE +/- 548.55, N = 21401.9

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4