Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 84GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3
OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: alwaysCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: NOOP / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: CPU Microcode: 0x5003003Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_302-b08)Security Notes: itlb_multihit: vulnerable + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT Host state unknown + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Vulnerable: Retpoline without IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.2412 0.4824 0.7236 0.9648 1.206 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 1.072 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 0.225 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 11.01, N = 3 1090.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 25.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.082, N = 3 8.559 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 24.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.079, N = 15 8.971 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.2333 0.4666 0.6999 0.9332 1.1665 SE +/- 0.015, N = 3 1.037 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.4554 0.9108 1.3662 1.8216 2.277 SE +/- 0.019, N = 3 2.024 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.086, N = 15 8.752 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 31.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.120, N = 3 6.883 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lsqlite3 -lsnappy -lpthread
SQLite This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.81, N = 12 17.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
BlogBench BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 5283.87, N = 9 541630 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 16.50, N = 3 945 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 SE +/- 0.00000663, N = 3 0.00201362
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 110M 220M 330M 440M 550M SE +/- 254199.98, N = 3 529762627 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.72, N = 3 295.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 60.11, N = 3 19022.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
MariaDB This is a MariaDB MySQL database server benchmark making use of mysqlslap. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 302.51, N = 12 2943 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 8 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 13.79, N = 3 1716 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 63.58, N = 9 1158 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 32 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.38, N = 3 808 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 64 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 11.83, N = 9 388 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 128 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 203 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 256 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 154 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 512 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1024 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 2048 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 4096 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -pthread -llzma -lbz2 -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -laio -lsystemd -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.0119 0.0238 0.0357 0.0476 0.0595 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.053 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 6.45, N = 3 1303 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.1728 0.3456 0.5184 0.6912 0.864 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 0.768 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 241.71, N = 3 36988 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.3042 0.6084 0.9126 1.2168 1.521 SE +/- 0.009, N = 3 1.352 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 433.93, N = 4 35584 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.6327 1.2654 1.8981 2.5308 3.1635 SE +/- 0.035, N = 4 2.812 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 364.03, N = 12 30698 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.104, N = 12 8.157 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 53.18, N = 12 1304 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 1.97, N = 12 39.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 228.44, N = 12 24736 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.19, N = 12 20.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 211.83, N = 3 16437 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.0137 0.0274 0.0411 0.0548 0.0685 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.061 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 37.22, N = 12 1048 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 4.16, N = 12 97.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 16.20, N = 12 514 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 18.95, N = 12 493.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 5.27, N = 12 275 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 35.47, N = 12 1824.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 14.49, N = 3 1088 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.207 0.414 0.621 0.828 1.035 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 0.920 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 163.09, N = 3 30877 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.3645 0.729 1.0935 1.458 1.8225 SE +/- 0.009, N = 3 1.620 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 13.06, N = 3 1031 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.2183 0.4366 0.6549 0.8732 1.0915 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 0.970 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 371.51, N = 12 29954 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.7524 1.5048 2.2572 3.0096 3.762 SE +/- 0.044, N = 12 3.344 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 195.77, N = 3 25890 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.074, N = 3 9.657 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 39.73, N = 3 3948 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 12.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 149.43, N = 12 16925 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.26, N = 12 29.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 36.70, N = 9 439 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 0.5803 1.1606 1.7409 2.3212 2.9015 SE +/- 0.460, N = 9 2.579 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1266.24, N = 9 11487 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1.1095 2.219 3.3285 4.438 5.5475 SE +/- 0.663, N = 9 4.931 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1666.92, N = 9 82898.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 14.84, N = 3 4005 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 24.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 11.81, N = 3 3269 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 76.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 24.99, N = 5 2489 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.04, N = 5 201.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1078.67, N = 6 11325 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 1.210, N = 6 9.397 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 805.19, N = 9 10765 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 2.24, N = 9 24.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 95.30, N = 9 3142 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.57, N = 9 16.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 100.58, N = 3 11146 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 44.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 5556.30, N = 9 243818.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 85716.46, N = 3 2510002.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 21.22, N = 3 2964 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 33.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 39.67, N = 9 2715 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.36, N = 9 92.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 49.10, N = 9 2310 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.78, N = 9 217.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1.3M 2.6M 3.9M 5.2M 6.5M SE +/- 58028.40, N = 3 6075845.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M SE +/- 1955462.36, N = 3 18345089.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1.1M 2.2M 3.3M 4.4M 5.5M SE +/- 129311.90, N = 3 5361656.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 449406.91, N = 3 22802369.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 202621.46, N = 3 12199870.66 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 3023518.13, N = 3 36891588.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 1881226.66, N = 3 81367267.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Memtier_benchmark Memtier_benchmark is a NoSQL Redis/Memcache traffic generation plus benchmarking tool. This current test profile currently just stresses the Redis protocol and basic options exposed wotj a 1:1 Set/Get ratio, 30 pipeline, 100 clients per thread, and thread count equal to the number of CPU cores/threads present. Patches to extend the test are welcome as always. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 5563.91, N = 3 1314620.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
nginx This is a benchmark of the lightweight Nginx HTTP(S) web-server. This Nginx web server benchmark test profile makes use of the Golang "Bombardier" program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 71.06, N = 3 61231.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 173.88, N = 3 99340.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 495.58, N = 3 99266.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 366.77, N = 3 98472.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1187.52, N = 3 88781.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 885.14, N = 3 83529.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lpthread -lcrypt -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 1221.88, N = 5 3362
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.23, N = 15 208
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 4.94, N = 12 636
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 17.01, N = 12 323
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.36, N = 15 117
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.65, N = 15 260
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.93, N = 5 816
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 2.50, N = 15 70
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.51, N = 15 136
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.49, N = 12 514
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 69.70, N = 9 3806
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.83, N = 15 308
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 6.45, N = 8 753
OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 80.80, N = 3 6722
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 29.34, N = 3 2378
Apache HTTP Server This is a test of the Apache HTTPD web server. This Apache HTTPD web server benchmark test profile makes use of the Golang "Bombardier" program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 22.04, N = 3 7342.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 60.38, N = 3 12889.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 94.66, N = 3 13664.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 34.44, N = 3 13297.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 126.85, N = 3 12807.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 98.90, N = 3 11398.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 135.63, N = 3 9592.99 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHPBench PHPBench is a benchmark suite for PHP. It performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter. PHPBench can be used to compare hardware, operating systems, PHP versions, PHP accelerators and caches, compiler options, etc. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 214.76, N = 3 170696
InfluxDB This is a benchmark of the InfluxDB open-source time-series database optimized for fast, high-availability storage for IoT and other use-cases. The InfluxDB test profile makes use of InfluxDB Inch for facilitating the benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 673.15, N = 3 403800.1
OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 612.09, N = 3 399839.1
OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 548.55, N = 2 1401.9
Virtual disk - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 84GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3
OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: alwaysCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: NOOP / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: CPU Microcode: 0x5003003Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_302-b08)Security Notes: itlb_multihit: vulnerable + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT Host state unknown + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Vulnerable: Retpoline without IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 6 October 2021 16:40 by user .