centos79-1006-311 centos79-1006-311 centos79-1006-311: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 84GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1.072 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.2 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1090.69 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 25.1 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8.559 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 24.3 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8.971 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1.037 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2.024 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8.752 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 31.9 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 6.883 |==================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 17.04 |==================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 541630 |=================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 945 |====================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 73144 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.16404884 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.00201362 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 529762627 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 295.2 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 19022.1 |================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 136.39 |=================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2943 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1716 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1158 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 808 |====================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 388 |====================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 203 |====================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 154 |====================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 61 |======================================================= MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 14 |======================================================= MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 15 |======================================================= MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 15 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 18754 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.053 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1303 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.768 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 36988 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1.352 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 35584 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2.812 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 30698 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8.157 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1304 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 39.22 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 24736 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 20.23 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 16437 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.061 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1048 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 97.00 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 514 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 493.18 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 275 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1824.49 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1088 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.920 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 30877 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1.620 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1031 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 0.970 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 29954 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3.344 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 25890 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 9.657 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3948 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 12.67 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 16925 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 29.57 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 439 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2.579 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 11487 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 4.931 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 82898.00 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 4005 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 24.97 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3269 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 76.49 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2489 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 201.00 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 11325 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 9.397 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 10765 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 24.55 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3142 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 16.05 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 11146 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 44.87 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 243818.27 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2510002.79 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2964 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 33.74 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2715 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 92.24 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2310 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 217.22 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 6075845.27 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 18345089.02 |============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 5361656.56 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 22802369.88 |============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 12199870.66 |============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 36891588.08 |============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 81367267.67 |============================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 113.80 |=================================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1314620.83 |=============================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8717 |===================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 61231.07 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 99340.44 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 99266.80 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 98472.56 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 88781.87 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 83529.04 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 5575 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 178 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8105 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 492 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 6960 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3362 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8425 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 118 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 19116 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 208 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 25063 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 636 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 46577 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 21 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 49896 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 80 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 50804 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 323 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 8508 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 117 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 15304 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 260 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 19555 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 816 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 53400 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 18 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 56849 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 70 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 7253 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 136 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 7763 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 514 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 55134 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 288 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 4210 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3806 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 3234 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 308 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 5304 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 753 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 6722 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 2378 |===================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 7342.38 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 12889.88 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 13664.16 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 13297.59 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 12807.86 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 11398.26 |================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 9771.40 |================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 9592.99 |================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 170696 |=================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1.556 |==================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 7.377 |==================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 403800.1 |================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 399839.1 |================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-1006-311 . 1401.9 |===================================================