amd-epyc- 7742 Linux AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-19-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-19-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-19-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19284.7 |================================================================== 2 . 19192.4 |================================================================== 3 . 19215.7 |================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2270.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 2267.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2268.2 |=================================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.41 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.43 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.42 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1902 |===================================================================== 2 . 1726 |=============================================================== 3 . 1784 |================================================================= LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1828 |================================================================ 2 . 1964 |===================================================================== 3 . 1932 |==================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.30 |==================================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.45700 |================================================================== 2 . 0.45581 |================================================================== 3 . 0.45588 |================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 11.06 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.196471 |================================================================= 2 . 6.128498 |================================================================ 3 . 6.020976 |=============================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 153.90 |=================================================================== 2 . 154.62 |=================================================================== 3 . 153.63 |=================================================================== NWChem 7.0.2 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2421.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2405.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 2405.5 |=================================================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 150.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 148.41 |================================================================== 3 . 149.63 |=================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.56595707 |============================================================== 2 . 6.72371006 |=============================================================== 3 . 6.68525219 |=============================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 31.47 |================================================================== 3 . 32.18 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 22.68 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.72 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 309.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 308.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 309.60 |=================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 343.22 |=================================================================== 2 . 344.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 345.24 |=================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.16 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.11 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.16 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.79 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.79 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.79 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.07 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.06 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.06 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.43 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.45 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.46 |===================================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 4632.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 4631.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 4632.0 |=================================================================== Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 21143.4 |================================================================== 2 . 21017.7 |================================================================== 3 . 21020.3 |================================================================== Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 40869.7 |================================================================== 2 . 40953.4 |================================================================== 3 . 41072.8 |================================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Plain C++ IPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 130400 |=================================================================== 2 . 130600 |=================================================================== 3 . 130900 |=================================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Assembly Optimized IPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 111800 |================================================================== 2 . 113600 |=================================================================== 3 . 107100 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 977.8 |=========================================================== 2 . 1103.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 978.6 |=========================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1149.7 |================================================================== 2 . 1168.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 1148.1 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11036.6 |================================================================== 2 . 11089.9 |================================================================== 3 . 10957.6 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2043.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 1999.6 |================================================================= 3 . 2051.4 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 838.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 843.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 834.9 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 14513.6 |================================================================== 2 . 13582.6 |============================================================== 3 . 14300.1 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4387.7 |================================================================= 2 . 4530.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 4411.3 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3918.5 |================================================================= 2 . 4016.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 3936.9 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7431.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 7305.7 |================================================================== 3 . 7091.7 |================================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25336.2 |================================================================= 2 . 25764.6 |================================================================== 3 . 24185.6 |============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3391.6 |================================================================== 2 . 3462.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 3376.6 |================================================================= JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 59.55 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.82 |=================================================================== 3 . 56.88 |================================================================= JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.69 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.60 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.61 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.71 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.72 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.72 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 66.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 64.42 |================================================================== 3 . 65.42 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 65.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 64.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 65.36 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.75 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.58 |=================================================================== 3 . 22.72 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45.35 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 45.00 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 193.89 |================================================================== 2 . 190.27 |================================================================= 3 . 195.75 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 78.42 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.35 |==================================================================== 3 . 78.38 |==================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 75.92 |==================================================================== 2 . 75.84 |==================================================================== 3 . 75.85 |==================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4526.44 |================================================================== 2 . 4520.97 |================================================================== 3 . 4518.85 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4526.67 |================================================================== 2 . 4525.76 |================================================================== 3 . 4525.43 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 286.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 285.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 286.06 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 290.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 289.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 290.03 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 343.98 |=================================================================== 2 . 344.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 344.11 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 343.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 343.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 343.41 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 119.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 119.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 119.30 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 119.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 119.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 119.49 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 656.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 657.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 657.84 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 652.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 648.13 |=================================================================== 3 . 650.73 |=================================================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 667.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 672.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 662.1 |=================================================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 346.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 345.2 |==================================================================== 3 . 346.4 |==================================================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 84.1 |===================================================================== 2 . 84.2 |===================================================================== 3 . 84.1 |===================================================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Complex Phase MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 525.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 527.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 526.2 |==================================================================== GNU Radio Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 469.8 |================================================================== 2 . 482.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 481.8 |==================================================================== GNU Radio Test: Signal Source (Cosine) MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3034.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 3011.7 |================================================================== 3 . 2903.1 |================================================================ GNU Radio Test: FIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 535.4 |================================================================ 2 . 571.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 567.9 |==================================================================== GNU Radio Test: IIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 504.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 503.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 501.6 |==================================================================== GNU Radio Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 746.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 749.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 747.0 |==================================================================== GNU Radio Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 352.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 356.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 355.6 |==================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 7.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 7.70 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.70 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.71 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.43 |================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.93 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.76 |=================================================================== 3 . 12.01 |==================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.18 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 5.95 |================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.59 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.21 |========================================================== 3 . 23.01 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 670.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 672.59 |=================================================================== 3 . 664.16 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 285.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 286.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 285.09 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 673.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 671.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 674.03 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 524.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 524.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 524.06 |=================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 62.5 |===================================================================== 2 . 62.5 |===================================================================== 3 . 62.5 |===================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 12.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 12.05 |==================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.29 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.29 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.29 |===================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 83.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 83.33 |==================================================================== 3 . 83.33 |==================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.41 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.45 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.45 |===================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.48 |==================================================================== 2 . 43.48 |==================================================================== 3 . 43.48 |==================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 18.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 18.18 |==================================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 250 |====================================================================== 2 . 250 |====================================================================== 3 . 250 |====================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.18 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.18 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.18 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.23 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.29 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.25 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.46 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.51 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.53 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.41 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.49 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.39 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 26.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 26.37 |================================================================== 3 . 27.06 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 35.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 35.95 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.42 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.42 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.42 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.44 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.49 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 16.35 |=================================================================== 2 . 16.48 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.42 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 13.16 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.05 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 64.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 64.24 |==================================================================== 3 . 63.96 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 78.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.98 |==================================================================== 3 . 78.79 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 51.75 |==================================================================== 2 . 51.83 |==================================================================== 3 . 51.86 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 47.55 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.60 |==================================================================== 3 . 47.68 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 57.12 |==================================================================== 3 . 57.06 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 50.58 |==================================================================== 2 . 50.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 50.50 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 52.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 52.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.88 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 46.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 46.12 |==================================================================== 3 . 46.19 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.954 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.928 |=================================================================== 3 . 3.998 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 41.19 |=================================================================== 2 . 41.37 |==================================================================== 3 . 41.62 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.236 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.121 |=================================================================== 3 . 8.019 |================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 95.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 94.04 |================================================================= 3 . 97.68 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 34.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 34.69 |==================================================================== 3 . 34.76 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 192.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 190.17 |================================================================== 3 . 193.30 |=================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 343.05 |================================================================== 2 . 342.47 |================================================================== 3 . 346.62 |=================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 264.17 |=================================================================== 2 . 259.96 |================================================================== 3 . 256.28 |================================================================= SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 266.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 263.45 |================================================================== 3 . 264.51 |================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 190.76 |================================================================== 2 . 192.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 188.81 |================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.92 |=================================================================== 2 . 5.06 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.03 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.26 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 8.33 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.55 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.59 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.44 |==================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.57 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 22.71 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.47 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.47 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.47 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.47 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.47 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.47 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.72 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.72 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.72 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 130 |====================================================================== 2 . 130 |====================================================================== 3 . 130 |====================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 84 |======================================================================= 2 . 83 |====================================================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 806909.16 |================================================================ 2 . 806451.61 |================================================================ Stockfish 13 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 141469805 |============================================================= 2 . 148124042 |================================================================ asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 . 135484232 |================================================================ 2 . 133090713 |=============================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 58.12 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.18 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.30 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.32 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.412 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.377 |=================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.89 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.83 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.465 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.480 |==================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.59 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.59 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 852.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 851.88 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 59.22 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.93 |==================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.86 |==================================================================== 2 . 30.08 |==================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 162.33 |=================================================================== 2 . 162.43 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 228.34 |=================================================================== 2 . 227.76 |=================================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.23 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.91 |=================================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.23 |==================================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.168 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.165 |==================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 313.73 |=================================================================== 2 . 311.30 |================================================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 150.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 151.97 |=================================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 64.63 |==================================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.69 |==================================================================== 2 . 29.61 |==================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.42 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.41 |==================================================================== Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit Seconds < Lower Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 195.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 191.52 |================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 194.36 |================================================================== 2 . 196.38 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 130.87 |=============================================================== 2 . 138.53 |=================================================================== VOSK Speech Recognition Toolkit 0.3.21 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.51 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.65 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 605.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 606.06 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1832.53 |================================================================== 2 . 1418.39 |=================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1446.75 |================================================================= 2 . 1476.94 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36160 |=================================================================== 2 . 36760 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3003.21 |================================================================= 2 . 3045.15 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 863790 |=================================================================== 2 . 846000 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1623.56 |================================================================= 2 . 1643.10 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 230000 |=================================================================== 2 . 231330 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14360 |======= 2 . 145000 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 95930 |==================================================================== 2 . 96030 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 127500 |=================================================================== 2 . 127110 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 254250 |================================================================== 2 . 258000 |=================================================================== SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better 1 . 178413 |=================================================================== 2 . 178987 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 61535727150 |============================================================== 2 . 60669877340 |============================================================= OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12598.5 |================================================================== 2 . 12594.3 |================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 826138.6 |================================================================= 2 . 826773.2 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2928.91 |================================================================== 2 . 2922.88 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4243.12 |================================================================== 2 . 4241.54 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8875.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 8875.2 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5433.8 |================================================================== 2 . 5547.0 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 473.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 473.93 |=================================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 175.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 175.29 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 28411 |==================================================================== 2 . 28541 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.035 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.035 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3526 |===================================================================== 2 . 3489 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.284 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.287 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1050417 |================================================================== 2 . 1026390 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.048 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.049 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1382967 |================================================================== 2 . 1380748 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.072 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.072 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1464227 |================================================================= 2 . 1496182 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.171 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.167 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3061 |===================================================================== 2 . 3021 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.33 |=================================================================== 2 . 16.55 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1487362 |================================================================== 2 . 1475471 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.336 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.339 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 25186 |=================================================================== 2 . 25467 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.040 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.039 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1831 |===================================================================== 2 . 1842 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 54.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 54.29 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1176 |================================================================ 2 . 1269 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 212.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 197.04 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 522 |====================================================================== 2 . 370 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 957.42 |=============================================== 2 . 1350.74 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3158 |===================================================================== 2 . 3115 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.317 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.321 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 962516 |=================================================================== 2 . 964474 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.052 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1321848 |================================================================== 2 . 1312824 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.076 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.076 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1385792 |================================================================== 2 . 1394519 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.180 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.179 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 54728 |==================================================================== 2 . 40260 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.914 |================================================== 2 . 1.242 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1422529 |================================================================== 2 . 1413395 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.351 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.354 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 78082 |==================================================================== 2 . 64721 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.281 |======================================================== 2 . 1.545 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 69372 |==================================================================== 2 . 68318 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.604 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.659 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 64543 |==================================================================== 2 . 64818 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.747 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.714 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.7182 |================================================================== 2 . 4.7591 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.1093 |=================================================================== 2 . 7.1025 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.39 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.40 |==================================================================== OpenSCAD Render: Pistol Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 133.17 |=================================================================== 2 . 133.34 |=================================================================== OpenSCAD Render: Retro Car Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.240 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.249 |==================================================================== OpenSCAD Render: Mini-ITX Case Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 60.90 |=================================================================== 2 . 61.80 |==================================================================== OpenSCAD Render: Projector Mount Swivel Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.06 |==================================================================== OpenSCAD Render: Leonardo Phone Case Slim Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.38 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1233685.62 |=============================================================== 2 . 1193921.62 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1640984.62 |=============================================================== 2 . 1466275.62 |======================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1159879.38 |============================================================== 2 . 1169624.25 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1666127.38 |=============================================================== 2 . 1630586.00 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1348660.88 |=============================================================== 2 . 1277996.25 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1014.29 |================================================================== 2 . 1014.87 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 171.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 170.30 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1073.05 |================================================================== 2 . 1070.25 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 313255.36 |================================================================ 2 . 312437.21 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12987.43 |================================================================= 2 . 12920.33 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1305333403.36 |============================================================ 2 . 1303991539.21 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 66186.90 |================================================================= 2 . 65898.46 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 191321.93 |================================================================ 2 . 189694.35 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 882683.64 |================================================================ 2 . 886621.34 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 168.98 |============================================================ 2 . 189.09 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 133409.88 |================================================================ 2 . 134138.32 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9701581.31 |=============================================================== 2 . 9627230.66 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 200044.38 |================================================================ 2 . 200451.26 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 246603.81 |================================================================ 2 . 246605.80 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11224.66 |================================================================= 2 . 11237.18 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20382.23 |================================================================= 2 . 20241.57 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19976629.68 |============================================================== 2 . 18832756.59 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7071349.69 |=============================================================== 2 . 7029537.74 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 765.93 |================================================================== 2 . 772.43 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6753748.00 |============================================================== 2 . 6899008.03 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.134 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.946 |================================================================ Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.375 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.293 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.77 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.279 |============================================================== 2 . 7.978 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.590 |======================================================== 2 . 5.562 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.004 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.036 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 27.38 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.77 |================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.11 |=================================================================== 2 . 35.59 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 25.83 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.52 |================================================================= 2 . 22.38 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.53 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.64 |============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 28.68 |==================================================================== 2 . 28.33 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.07 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.28 |=============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 33.85 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 41.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 40.82 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.59 |=============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.72 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 34.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 34.63 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 33.96 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.66 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 58.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.49 |================================================================= TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3057.61 |================================================================== 2 . 3058.64 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 327.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 328.94 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 87.78 |==================================================================== 2 . 87.88 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 306.20 |=================================================================== 2 . 306.93 |=================================================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6108.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 6123.9 |=================================================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 108556.99 |================================================================ 2 . 108529.32 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 385404 |================================================================ 2 . 401986 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 236573 |================================================================== 2 . 239749 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 332876 |=================================================================== 2 . 331589 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 231204575 |=============================================================== 2 . 236038986 |================================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 321268 |=================================================================== 2 . 317400 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 341003 |=================================================================== 2 . 340026 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 220557 |=================================================================== 2 . 218196 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8614943 |================================================================== 2 . 8576849 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3163268 |================================================================== 2 . 3144095 |================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.79 |==================================================================== 2 . 35.73 |==================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 92.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 90.93 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 51.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 50.86 |==================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 132.69 |=================================================================== 2 . 132.71 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 106.22 |=================================================================== 2 . 106.18 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 287 |===================================================================== 2 . 293 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 390 |====================================================================== 2 . 353 |=============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 213 |=================================================================== 2 . 222 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 8961 |===================================================================== 2 . 8700 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 3464 |===================================================================== 2 . 3443 |===================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P1B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 43.84 |==================================================================== 2 . 43.73 |==================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 909.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 913.55 |=================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1215.86 |================================================================== 2 . 1213.26 |================================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 44129.21 |================================================================= 2 . 44055.18 |================================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 118722.39 |================================================================ 2 . 116572.72 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 139485.56 |================================================================ 2 . 137442.04 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 139695.39 |================================================================ 2 . 138886.39 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 145640.26 |================================================================ 2 . 143673.78 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 148265.67 |================================================================ 2 . 146868.24 |=============================================================== Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.9 |====================================================================== 2 . 1.8 |================================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5266.99 |================================================================== 2 . 5017.06 |=============================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 47319.45 |========================================================== 2 . 53269.97 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 108644.73 |================================================================ 2 . 101209.89 |============================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 120761.72 |================================================================ 2 . 118779.24 |=============================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 107795.05 |================================================================ 2 . 107774.13 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 107390.56 |================================================================ 2 . 106711.05 |================================================================ Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 150.67 |================================================================= 2 . 154.21 |=================================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 67.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 67.65 |==================================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 182.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 182.15 |=================================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 589001 |=================================================================== 2 . 587155 |=================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 193583700 |================================================================ 2 . 191552700 |=============================================================== BRL-CAD 7.32.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 1 . 703210 |=================================================================== 2 . 700958 |=================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 48689 |==================================================================== 2 . 48915 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.15 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.30 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.32 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.18 |=================================================================== 2 . 43.53 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.38 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.54 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.58 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.64 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.40 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 101.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 100.66 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 215.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 215.35 |===================================================================