epyc 7601 october 2021 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core testing with a Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 120GB INTEL SSDSCKJB120G7R + 11 x 500GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200922-generic (x86_64) 20200921, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 B: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 120GB INTEL SSDSCKJB120G7R + 11 x 500GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200922-generic (x86_64) 20200921, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 C: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 120GB INTEL SSDSCKJB120G7R + 11 x 500GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200922-generic (x86_64) 20200921, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 157965.56 |================================================================ B . 157799.92 |================================================================ C . 157511.51 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 21760.12 |================================================================= B . 21589.96 |================================================================ C . 21784.58 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2723.43 |================================================================== B . 2710.98 |================================================================== C . 2730.54 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2711.61 |================================================================== B . 2707.89 |================================================================= C . 2729.55 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 63581.04 |================================================================= B . 61853.35 |=============================================================== C . 61997.80 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2008.38 |================================================================== B . 2013.98 |================================================================== C . 2011.97 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 139353.70 |================================================================ B . 139215.13 |================================================================ C . 139637.33 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 93101.19 |================================================================= B . 93116.12 |================================================================= C . 93472.18 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 86233.31 |================================================================= B . 86120.31 |================================================================= C . 86185.13 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 73830.43 |================================================================= B . 74077.63 |================================================================= C . 73860.50 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better A . 1431.7 |=================================================================== B . 1256.6 |=========================================================== C . 1381.5 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better A . 1254.0 |=================================================================== B . 1184.2 |=============================================================== C . 1250.3 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better A . 12313.7 |================================================================ B . 12780.8 |================================================================== C . 12277.1 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better A . 3066.0 |=================================================================== B . 3057.8 |=================================================================== C . 2937.6 |================================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better A . 1116.6 |======================================================= B . 1350.0 |=================================================================== C . 1245.1 |============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better A . 20562.3 |================================================================ B . 21155.4 |================================================================== C . 19268.0 |============================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better A . 6616.9 |=================================================================== B . 6346.2 |================================================================ C . 6600.5 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better A . 7321.9 |================================================================= B . 7209.3 |================================================================ C . 7530.8 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better A . 9500.9 |================================================================ B . 9934.8 |=================================================================== C . 9254.4 |============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better A . 47436.1 |================================================================= B . 48402.8 |================================================================== C . 48221.3 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better A . 2606.9 |=============================================================== B . 2760.5 |=================================================================== C . 2621.3 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2972.1 |============================================================== B . 3215.3 |=================================================================== B . 3131.8 |================================================================= C . 2844.3 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2526.5 |=================================================================== B . 2507.5 |================================================================== C . 2492.7 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 1114.6 |============================================================ B . 1244.1 |=================================================================== C . 1158.8 |============================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2616.0 |=================================================================== B . 2597.4 |=================================================================== C . 2592.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 38.8 |====================================================== B . 49.4 |===================================================================== C . 44.9 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2276.4 |=================================================================== B . 2269.5 |=================================================================== C . 2268.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 525.3 |==================================================================== B . 501.1 |================================================================= C . 511.5 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2713.0 |=================================================================== B . 2679.4 |================================================================== C . 2668.3 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 515.2 |================================================================== B . 527.9 |==================================================================== C . 473.4 |============================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2800.5 |=================================================================== B . 2782.4 |=================================================================== C . 2762.3 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 28.0 |=========================================================== B . 30.0 |=============================================================== C . 32.7 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2329.0 |=================================================================== B . 2315.5 |=================================================================== C . 2302.1 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 44.37 |==================================================================== B . 43.59 |=================================================================== C . 42.04 |================================================================ JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.22 |===================================================================== B . 8.16 |==================================================================== C . 8.18 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.56 |==================================================================== B . 0.57 |===================================================================== C . 0.57 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 50.72 |==================================================================== B . 50.74 |==================================================================== C . 50.89 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 50.77 |=================================================================== B . 51.31 |==================================================================== C . 50.04 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 18.21 |==================================================================== B . 18.06 |=================================================================== C . 17.61 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 32.78 |==================================================================== B . 32.39 |=================================================================== C . 32.40 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 98.00 |==================================================================== B . 96.24 |=================================================================== C . 95.39 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better A . 62733333 |================================================================= B . 63100000 |================================================================= C . 62800000 |================================================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 241.2 |==================================================================== B . 242.2 |==================================================================== C . 241.0 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 85.2 |===================================================================== B . 85.3 |===================================================================== C . 85.4 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 246.6 |=================================================================== B . 248.7 |==================================================================== C . 248.5 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 134.0 |==================================================================== B . 133.8 |==================================================================== C . 133.4 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 265.5 |==================================================================== B . 264.1 |=================================================================== C . 266.5 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 91.4 |===================================================================== B . 88.0 |================================================================== C . 91.3 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 270.9 |==================================================================== B . 271.1 |==================================================================== C . 270.6 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 160.7 |==================================================================== B . 160.8 |==================================================================== C . 160.6 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 68.2 |===================================================================== B . 68.1 |===================================================================== C . 68.2 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 34.9 |===================================================================== B . 34.8 |==================================================================== C . 35.1 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 74.3 |===================================================================== B . 74.1 |===================================================================== C . 74.2 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 46.8 |===================================================================== B . 46.8 |===================================================================== C . 47.0 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.21 |===================================================================== B . 3.19 |===================================================================== C . 3.13 |=================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.16 |==================================================================== B . 7.27 |===================================================================== C . 7.25 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.66 |===================================================================== B . 7.30 |================================================================== C . 7.59 |==================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 14.82 |================================================================== B . 15.38 |==================================================================== C . 14.51 |================================================================ Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.88 |===================================================================== B . 0.87 |==================================================================== C . 0.88 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.87 |=================================================================== B . 0.88 |==================================================================== C . 0.89 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.45 |===================================================================== B . 0.45 |===================================================================== C . 0.44 |=================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 29.18 |==================================================================== B . 28.94 |=================================================================== C . 29.02 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1034.41 |================================================================== B . 1039.22 |================================================================== C . 1033.74 |================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 60.39 |=================================================================== B . 60.36 |=================================================================== C . 60.92 |==================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.18 |================================================================ B . 31.99 |==================================================================== C . 31.60 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 193.85 |================================================================== B . 195.38 |=================================================================== C . 192.69 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 283.72 |================================================================== B . 283.26 |================================================================== C . 287.75 |=================================================================== YafaRay 3.5.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 98.19 |================================================================= B . 90.94 |============================================================ C . 101.30 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 22.42 |==================================================================== B . 22.42 |==================================================================== C . 22.56 |==================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 19.81 |==================================================================== B . 19.69 |=================================================================== C . 19.93 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better A . 512.09 |=================================================================== B . 512.11 |=================================================================== C . 512.11 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1860.45 |================================================================== B . 1845.93 |================================================================= C . 1853.39 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1286.65 |================================================================== B . 1288.94 |================================================================== C . 1292.63 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 26310 |=================================================================== B . 25830 |================================================================== C . 26600 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 2318.17 |================================================================= B . 2309.04 |================================================================= C . 2337.53 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1082755 |============================================================= B . 1178490 |================================================================== C . 1049190 |=========================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 7143.89 |================================================================= B . 7262.22 |================================================================== C . 7138.93 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 233648 |================================================================ B . 244890 |=================================================================== C . 226290 |============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 6560.96 |================================================================== B . 6564.47 |================================================================== C . 6561.44 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 57560 |==================================================================== B . 57980 |==================================================================== C . 57180 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 347933 |====================================================== B . 353440 |======================================================= C . 433120 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 762947 |================================================================== B . 777020 |=================================================================== C . 747600 |================================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better A . 62424127177 |============================================================= B . 63181613930 |============================================================== C . 62900355740 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 9267.3 |=================================================================== B . 9266.6 |=================================================================== C . 9267.7 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 598137.8 |================================================================= B . 598937.6 |================================================================= C . 598013.5 |================================================================= GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better A . 4.100 |=================================================================== B . 4.158 |==================================================================== C . 4.085 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 17938 |==================================================================== B . 18055 |==================================================================== C . 17880 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.056 |==================================================================== B . 0.055 |=================================================================== C . 0.056 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2642 |==================================================================== B . 2671 |===================================================================== C . 2624 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.378 |=================================================================== B . 0.374 |=================================================================== C . 0.381 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 575338 |=================================================================== B . 572277 |================================================================== C . 577769 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.087 |==================================================================== B . 0.087 |==================================================================== C . 0.087 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 871137 |================================================================== B . 870977 |================================================================== C . 881285 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.115 |==================================================================== B . 0.115 |==================================================================== C . 0.113 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1105127 |================================================================ B . 1105393 |================================================================= C . 1130903 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.226 |==================================================================== B . 0.226 |==================================================================== C . 0.221 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 3527 |===================================================================== B . 3525 |===================================================================== C . 3449 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.18 |================================================================== B . 14.18 |================================================================== C . 14.50 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1131277 |================================================================= B . 1150675 |================================================================== C . 1107782 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.442 |=================================================================== B . 0.435 |================================================================== C . 0.451 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 16423 |==================================================================== B . 16504 |==================================================================== C . 16491 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2696 |=================================================================== B . 2717 |=================================================================== C . 2778 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 37.09 |==================================================================== B . 36.81 |=================================================================== C . 36.00 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1506 |==================================================================== B . 1446 |================================================================= C . 1525 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 166.07 |================================================================ B . 172.92 |=================================================================== C . 163.95 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 595 |================================================================ B . 556 |============================================================ C . 648 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 850.51 |=============================================================== B . 899.73 |=================================================================== C . 771.08 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 2402 |==================================================================== B . 2441 |===================================================================== C . 2322 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.416 |================================================================== B . 0.410 |================================================================= C . 0.431 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 545674 |=================================================================== B . 542051 |=================================================================== C . 542550 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.092 |==================================================================== B . 0.092 |==================================================================== C . 0.092 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 828819 |================================================================== B . 832455 |=================================================================== C . 836467 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.121 |==================================================================== B . 0.120 |=================================================================== C . 0.120 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1061812 |================================================================== B . 1017670 |=============================================================== C . 1060833 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.236 |================================================================= B . 0.246 |==================================================================== C . 0.236 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 30955 |=============================================================== B . 33459 |==================================================================== C . 32161 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.622 |==================================================================== B . 1.494 |=============================================================== C . 1.555 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better A . 1025536 |================================================================= B . 1042229 |================================================================== C . 1025254 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.488 |==================================================================== B . 0.480 |=================================================================== C . 0.488 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 28196 |============================================================= B . 31554 |==================================================================== C . 25663 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.567 |============================================================== B . 3.169 |======================================================= C . 3.897 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 30522 |==================================================================== B . 26721 |============================================================ C . 30161 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 8.298 |============================================================ B . 9.356 |==================================================================== C . 8.289 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better A . 23542 |==================================================================== B . 23657 |==================================================================== C . 22001 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.24 |================================================================ B . 21.14 |=============================================================== C . 22.73 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 12177.95 |================================================================= B . 12162.42 |================================================================= C . 12178.79 |================================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.994 |================================================================== B . 6.705 |=============================================================== C . 7.189 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.63 |==================================================================== B . 10.38 |============================================================= C . 11.60 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 52.42 |==================================================================== B . 52.02 |=================================================================== C . 50.65 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 17.60 |==================================================================== B . 16.83 |================================================================= C . 16.56 |================================================================ Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 10.36 |================================================================= B . 10.78 |==================================================================== C . 10.19 |================================================================ Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.941 |=================================================== B . 7.278 |===================================================== C . 9.286 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 59.53 |=================================================================== B . 57.86 |================================================================= C . 60.79 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 67.73 |==================================================================== B . 60.80 |============================================================= C . 63.85 |================================================================ NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 41.75 |============================================================ B . 47.14 |==================================================================== C . 43.45 |=============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 40.15 |================================================================= B . 39.44 |================================================================ C . 41.92 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 39.54 |============================================================= B . 44.32 |==================================================================== C . 41.40 |================================================================ NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 37.20 |==================================================================== B . 35.05 |================================================================ C . 35.37 |================================================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 49.42 |============================================================= B . 47.43 |========================================================== C . 55.26 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.66 |================================================================= B . 17.99 |=============================================================== C . 19.50 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 70.93 |================================================================== B . 72.82 |==================================================================== C . 69.55 |================================================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 125.92 |=================================================================== B . 120.46 |================================================================ C . 122.20 |================================================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 62.44 |================================================================ B . 48.76 |================================================== C . 65.94 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 55.30 |================================================= B . 77.50 |==================================================================== C . 44.91 |======================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 99.76 |==================================================================== B . 96.86 |================================================================== C . 84.58 |========================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 85.00 |==================================================================== B . 76.83 |============================================================= C . 83.44 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 81.78 |==================================================================== B . 76.41 |================================================================ C . 74.02 |============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 140.53 |=================================================================== B . 138.84 |================================================================== C . 134.53 |================================================================ TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better A . 3335.89 |================================================================== B . 3335.34 |================================================================== C . 3321.16 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 368.66 |=================================================================== B . 371.02 |=================================================================== C . 370.14 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 92.19 |==================================================================== B . 91.91 |=================================================================== C . 92.70 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 336.95 |=================================================================== B . 336.81 |=================================================================== C . 336.75 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 162209 |====================================================== B . 201941 |=================================================================== C . 178431 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 131176 |================================================================= B . 134358 |=================================================================== C . 131814 |================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 145196 |================================================================== B . 142644 |================================================================= C . 146948 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 124084 |========================================================= B . 146868 |=================================================================== C . 147036 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 187920 |=================================================================== B . 186174 |================================================================== C . 188801 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 220298964 |============================================================ B . 234985394 |================================================================ C . 221279010 |============================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 182683 |=================================================================== B . 181415 |=================================================================== C . 181334 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 194529 |=================================================================== B . 194448 |=================================================================== C . 194529 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 132625 |================================================================= B . 137701 |=================================================================== C . 134467 |================================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 5450333 |================================================================== B . 5357056 |================================================================= C . 5343006 |================================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 1278894 |================================================================== B . 1273598 |================================================================== C . 1276744 |================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 109 |================================================================= B . 109 |================================================================= C . 118 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 136 |=================================================================== B . 143 |====================================================================== C . 137 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 110 |================================================================ B . 120 |====================================================================== C . 92 |====================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 3971 |==================================================================== B . 4010 |===================================================================== C . 3881 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 2147 |===================================================================== B . 2133 |===================================================================== C . 2086 |=================================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better A . 0.9 |====================================================================== B . 0.9 |====================================================================== C . 0.9 |====================================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better