Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 testing with a Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550 on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110098-TJ-HASWELLXE45
haswell xeon oktober
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 testing with a Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550 on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
2:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
3:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 87.69 |===================================================================
2 . 84.13 |================================================================
3 . 88.76 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 94.69 |====================================================================
2 . 93.56 |===================================================================
3 . 92.59 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3054.18 |==================================================================
2 . 3029.16 |=================================================================
3 . 2966.90 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 626.07 |=============================================================
2 . 612.86 |============================================================
3 . 686.59 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 110010 |===================================================================
2 . 109900 |===================================================================
3 . 104350 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 743.10 |===================================================================
2 . 731.69 |==================================================================
3 . 726.64 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 12540 |====================================================================
2 . 12170 |==================================================================
3 . 12540 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 4220.44 |================================================================
2 . 4347.23 |==================================================================
3 . 4143.94 |===============================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 8396.73 |==================================================================
2 . 7828.25 |==============================================================
3 . 8336.96 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 15010 |=================================================================
2 . 15590 |====================================================================
3 . 15150 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 21500 |==================================================================
2 . 20780 |================================================================
3 . 22130 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 25276 |====================================================================
2 . 24635 |==================================================================
3 . 24869 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 977 |=============================================================
2 . 979 |=============================================================
3 . 1110 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 112668 |===================================================================
2 . 112156 |===================================================================
3 . 112077 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 110086 |===================================================================
2 . 108626 |==================================================================
3 . 108779 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 101488 |=================================================================
2 . 97470 |===============================================================
3 . 104372 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 1329 |=====================================================================
2 . 1328 |=====================================================================
3 . 1331 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 23375 |===================================================================
2 . 23731 |====================================================================
3 . 23720 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 1234 |====================================================================
2 . 1259 |=====================================================================
3 . 1239 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 1005 |==================================================================
2 . 1044 |=====================================================================
3 . 1009 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 285 |===================================================================
2 . 255 |============================================================
3 . 299 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 108663 |===================================================================
2 . 108071 |===================================================================
3 . 108576 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 105599 |===================================================================
2 . 105373 |===================================================================
3 . 105379 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 92688 |==================================================================
2 . 94221 |====================================================================
3 . 94909 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 877 |===============================================
2 . 1282 |=====================================================================
3 . 129 |=======
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 274 |====================
2 . 771 |=========================================================
3 . 952 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 653 |======================================================================
2 . 612 |==================================================================
3 . 361 |=======================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.040 |==================================================================
2 . 0.041 |====================================================================
3 . 0.040 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.023 |====================================================================
2 . 1.022 |====================================================================
3 . 0.901 |============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.444 |====================================================================
2 . 0.446 |====================================================================
3 . 0.446 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.908 |===================================================================
2 . 0.921 |====================================================================
3 . 0.919 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.463 |=================================================================
2 . 2.565 |====================================================================
3 . 2.395 |===============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 37.62 |====================================================================
2 . 37.66 |====================================================================
3 . 37.56 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.043 |====================================================================
2 . 0.042 |==================================================================
3 . 0.042 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 81.03 |====================================================================
2 . 79.41 |===================================================================
3 . 80.71 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 248.77 |===================================================================
2 . 239.53 |=================================================================
3 . 247.73 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.513 |=============================================================
2 . 3.928 |====================================================================
3 . 3.342 |==========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.460 |====================================================================
2 . 0.463 |====================================================================
3 . 0.461 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.947 |====================================================================
2 . 0.949 |====================================================================
3 . 0.949 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.697 |====================================================================
2 . 2.653 |===================================================================
3 . 2.634 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 57.03 |==========
2 . 39.01 |=======
3 . 386.12 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 364.69 |===================================================================
2 . 129.76 |========================
3 . 104.99 |===================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 382.84 |=====================================
2 . 408.68 |========================================
3 . 691.72 |===================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1603.55 |================================================================
2 . 1660.82 |==================================================================
3 . 1644.11 |=================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1733.78 |=================================================================
2 . 1770.01 |==================================================================
3 . 1760.91 |==================================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 33.84 |=======================================================
2 . 36.31 |============================================================
3 . 41.47 |====================================================================