haswell xeon oktober

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 testing with a Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550 on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110098-TJ-HASWELLXE45
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 4 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1
October 09 2021
  2 Hours, 23 Minutes
2
October 09 2021
  2 Hours, 27 Minutes
3
October 09 2021
  2 Hours, 27 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 26 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

haswell xeon oktober Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 testing with a Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550 on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S1 (FF BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 4550, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 87.69 |=================================================================== 2 . 84.13 |================================================================ 3 . 88.76 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94.69 |==================================================================== 2 . 93.56 |=================================================================== 3 . 92.59 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3054.18 |================================================================== 2 . 3029.16 |================================================================= 3 . 2966.90 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 626.07 |============================================================= 2 . 612.86 |============================================================ 3 . 686.59 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 110010 |=================================================================== 2 . 109900 |=================================================================== 3 . 104350 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 743.10 |=================================================================== 2 . 731.69 |================================================================== 3 . 726.64 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12540 |==================================================================== 2 . 12170 |================================================================== 3 . 12540 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4220.44 |================================================================ 2 . 4347.23 |================================================================== 3 . 4143.94 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8396.73 |================================================================== 2 . 7828.25 |============================================================== 3 . 8336.96 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15010 |================================================================= 2 . 15590 |==================================================================== 3 . 15150 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 21500 |================================================================== 2 . 20780 |================================================================ 3 . 22130 |==================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.84 |======================================================= 2 . 36.31 |============================================================ 3 . 41.47 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 25276 |==================================================================== 2 . 24635 |================================================================== 3 . 24869 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.040 |================================================================== 2 . 0.041 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.040 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 977 |============================================================= 2 . 979 |============================================================= 3 . 1110 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.023 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.022 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.901 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 112668 |=================================================================== 2 . 112156 |=================================================================== 3 . 112077 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.444 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.446 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.446 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 110086 |=================================================================== 2 . 108626 |================================================================== 3 . 108779 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.908 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.921 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.919 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 101488 |================================================================= 2 . 97470 |=============================================================== 3 . 104372 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.463 |================================================================= 2 . 2.565 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.395 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1329 |===================================================================== 2 . 1328 |===================================================================== 3 . 1331 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.62 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.66 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.56 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 23375 |=================================================================== 2 . 23731 |==================================================================== 3 . 23720 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.043 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.042 |================================================================== 3 . 0.042 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1234 |==================================================================== 2 . 1259 |===================================================================== 3 . 1239 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 81.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 79.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 80.71 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1005 |================================================================== 2 . 1044 |===================================================================== 3 . 1009 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 248.77 |=================================================================== 2 . 239.53 |================================================================= 3 . 247.73 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 285 |=================================================================== 2 . 255 |============================================================ 3 . 299 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.513 |============================================================= 2 . 3.928 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.342 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 108663 |=================================================================== 2 . 108071 |=================================================================== 3 . 108576 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.460 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.463 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.461 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 105599 |=================================================================== 2 . 105373 |=================================================================== 3 . 105379 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.947 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.949 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.949 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 92688 |================================================================== 2 . 94221 |==================================================================== 3 . 94909 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.697 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.653 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.634 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 877 |=============================================== 2 . 1282 |===================================================================== 3 . 129 |======= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 57.03 |========== 2 . 39.01 |======= 3 . 386.12 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 274 |==================== 2 . 771 |========================================================= 3 . 952 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 364.69 |=================================================================== 2 . 129.76 |======================== 3 . 104.99 |=================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 653 |====================================================================== 2 . 612 |================================================================== 3 . 361 |======================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 382.84 |===================================== 2 . 408.68 |======================================== 3 . 691.72 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1603.55 |================================================================ 2 . 1660.82 |================================================================== 3 . 1644.11 |================================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1733.78 |================================================================= 2 . 1770.01 |================================================================== 3 . 1760.91 |==================================================================