Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS) and ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110031-TJ-1280SEPTE44
1280 september
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS) and ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 97.7 |=====================================================================
2 . 97.5 |=====================================================================
3 . 97.6 |=====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: MMAP
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 37.72 |====================================================================
2 . 37.73 |====================================================================
3 . 37.80 |====================================================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 883.9 |====================================================================
2 . 876.6 |===================================================================
3 . 859.9 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: NUMA
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 87.71 |====================================================================
2 . 87.99 |====================================================================
3 . 88.09 |====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: MEMFD
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 256.86 |===================================================================
2 . 252.02 |==================================================================
3 . 253.43 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Atomic
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 172213.38 |========================================================
2 . 185702.22 |============================================================
3 . 196749.42 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 804.62 |===================================================================
2 . 802.03 |===================================================================
3 . 803.31 |===================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Malloc
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 23764140.76 |==============================================================
2 . 23809158.49 |==============================================================
3 . 23695429.77 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: RdRand
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 5563.71 |================================================================
2 . 5707.58 |==================================================================
3 . 5649.68 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 24420.06 |=================================================================
2 . 24568.73 |=================================================================
3 . 24257.96 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: IO_uring
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: SENDFILE
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 55968.81 |=================================================================
2 . 55856.05 |=================================================================
3 . 56016.85 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 161.50 |===================================================================
2 . 146.83 |=============================================================
3 . 150.53 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 7671.48 |=================================================================
2 . 7766.33 |==================================================================
3 . 7642.45 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 546967.30 |================================================================
2 . 530845.07 |==============================================================
3 . 542767.44 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 17822.74 |================================================================
2 . 17974.20 |=================================================================
3 . 17591.60 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13106.11 |=================================================================
2 . 13106.60 |=================================================================
3 . 13110.25 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1083.49 |==================================================================
2 . 906.77 |=======================================================
3 . 1021.84 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3873.50 |==================================================================
2 . 3884.17 |==================================================================
3 . 3839.11 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1306722.72 |===============================================================
2 . 1316431.03 |===============================================================
3 . 1312953.17 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 238069.10 |===============================================================
2 . 239989.67 |================================================================
3 . 230993.43 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 60.07 |====================================================================
2 . 60.00 |====================================================================
3 . 59.87 |====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3015441.38 |===============================================================
2 . 3025124.91 |===============================================================
3 . 3020209.37 |===============================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 17.85 |==================================================================
2 . 18.53 |====================================================================
3 . 17.91 |==================================================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5
CPU Threads: 1
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 45.02 |==================================================================
2 . 46.69 |====================================================================
3 . 46.32 |===================================================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5
CPU Threads: All
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 136.87 |=================================================================
2 . 138.66 |==================================================================
3 . 141.54 |===================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 19.87 |====================================================================
2 . 19.93 |====================================================================
3 . 19.91 |====================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 5.96 |=====================================================================
2 . 5.92 |=====================================================================
3 . 5.95 |=====================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.65 |=====================================================================
2 . 0.65 |=====================================================================
3 . 0.65 |=====================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 56.14 |===================================================================
2 . 57.38 |====================================================================
3 . 57.00 |====================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 55.62 |====================================================================
2 . 55.10 |===================================================================
3 . 55.65 |====================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.5
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 22.96 |===================================================================
2 . 22.90 |===================================================================
3 . 23.15 |====================================================================
Google SynthMark 20201109
Test: VoiceMark_100
Voices > Higher Is Better
1 . 609.82 |===================================================================
2 . 609.77 |===================================================================
3 . 613.93 |===================================================================
GLmark2 2021.08.30
Resolution: 800 x 600
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 8790 |=====================================================================
2 . 8828 |=====================================================================
3 . 8807 |=====================================================================
GLmark2 2021.08.30
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 6660 |=====================================================================
2 . 6658 |=====================================================================
3 . 6672 |=====================================================================
GLmark2 2021.08.30
Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 4548 |=====================================================================
2 . 4548 |=====================================================================
3 . 4545 |=====================================================================
GLmark2 2021.08.30
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 3158 |=====================================================================
2 . 3097 |====================================================================
3 . 3155 |=====================================================================
LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: BLAS
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 800 |====================================================================
2 . 799 |====================================================================
3 . 819 |======================================================================
LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: Eigen
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 689 |==================================================================
2 . 717 |=====================================================================
3 . 728 |======================================================================
ECP-CANDLE 0.4
Benchmark: P1B2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 46.72 |====================================================================
2 . 45.30 |==================================================================
3 . 45.49 |==================================================================
ECP-CANDLE 0.4
Benchmark: P3B1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1250.93 |==================================================================
2 . 1258.11 |==================================================================
3 . 1258.38 |==================================================================
ECP-CANDLE 0.4
Benchmark: P3B2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 617.18 |==================================================================
2 . 621.60 |===================================================================
3 . 622.12 |===================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1754.23 |==================================================================
2 . 1757.68 |==================================================================
3 . 1753.80 |==================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1782.52 |==================================================================
2 . 1777.56 |==================================================================
3 . 1778.47 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 97.88 |====================================================================
2 . 98.05 |====================================================================
3 . 98.07 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 125.94 |===================================================================
2 . 125.48 |===================================================================
3 . 121.47 |=================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3792.80 |==================================================================
2 . 3809.95 |==================================================================
3 . 3803.65 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 838.13 |=================================================================
2 . 866.78 |===================================================================
3 . 857.73 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 134120 |===================================================================
2 . 132950 |==================================================================
3 . 134680 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 974.56 |==================================================================
2 . 956.60 |=================================================================
3 . 987.08 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 16660 |===================================================================
2 . 16640 |===================================================================
3 . 16880 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 5372.40 |=================================================================
2 . 5406.22 |==================================================================
3 . 5441.67 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 10730 |====================================================================
2 . 10550 |===================================================================
3 . 10690 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 18870 |====================================================================
2 . 18900 |====================================================================
3 . 18840 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 26690 |================================================================
2 . 28420 |====================================================================
3 . 26440 |===============================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1851.53 |==================================================================
2 . 1859.38 |==================================================================
3 . 1853.16 |==================================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 226.45 |===================================================================
2 . 226.17 |===================================================================
3 . 226.03 |===================================================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 219.65 |===================================================================
2 . 218.56 |===================================================================
3 . 218.77 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 317.66 |=================================================================
2 . 326.91 |===================================================================
3 . 324.79 |===================================================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: OpenGL 1.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 745.3 |==================================================================
2 . 719.8 |================================================================
3 . 770.7 |====================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 88.09 |====================================================================
2 . 88.49 |====================================================================
3 . 88.50 |====================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 294.22 |=================================================================
2 . 301.48 |===================================================================
3 . 301.49 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.9.2
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 247.89 |===================================================================
2 . 249.44 |===================================================================
3 . 248.13 |===================================================================
OpenVKL 1.0
Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 32 |=======================================================================
2 . 32 |=======================================================================
3 . 32 |=======================================================================
OpenVKL 1.0
Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 13 |=======================================================================
2 . 13 |=======================================================================
3 . 13 |=======================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 35052.74 |================================================================
2 . 35561.23 |=================================================================
3 . 35056.76 |================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 210048.45 |================================================================
2 . 210467.12 |================================================================
3 . 210648.02 |================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 206009.87 |================================================================
2 . 206736.32 |================================================================
3 . 205536.61 |================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 206208.88 |================================================================
2 . 206269.47 |================================================================
3 . 205578.16 |================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 199292.40 |================================================================
2 . 199530.09 |================================================================
3 . 198769.79 |================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 190259.53 |================================================================
2 . 190874.18 |================================================================
3 . 190001.20 |================================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 11863.39 |================================================================
2 . 11979.64 |=================================================================
3 . 11602.85 |===============================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 39587.58 |=================================================================
2 . 39595.90 |=================================================================
3 . 39272.69 |================================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 40250.27 |=================================================================
2 . 40422.98 |=================================================================
3 . 39754.37 |================================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 41670.30 |=================================================================
2 . 41388.93 |=================================================================
3 . 41273.91 |================================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 36343.73 |================================================================
2 . 36830.50 |=================================================================
3 . 36241.07 |================================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 35600.59 |=================================================================
2 . 35871.19 |=================================================================
3 . 35538.42 |================================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1289113570 |===============================================================
2 . 1289738880 |===============================================================
3 . 1288169600 |===============================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1134.0 |===================================================================
2 . 1130.9 |===================================================================
3 . 1134.5 |===================================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 74698.5 |==================================================================
2 . 74593.7 |==================================================================
3 . 74510.6 |==================================================================
KeyDB 6.2.0
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 392182.99 |================================================================
2 . 391220.73 |================================================================
3 . 392540.52 |================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 21660 |====================================================================
2 . 21058 |==================================================================
3 . 21224 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.046 |===================================================================
2 . 0.047 |====================================================================
3 . 0.047 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 202 |======================================================================
2 . 199 |=====================================================================
3 . 196 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 4.957 |==================================================================
2 . 5.031 |===================================================================
3 . 5.096 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 104905 |===================================================================
2 . 104973 |===================================================================
3 . 105331 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.477 |====================================================================
2 . 0.476 |====================================================================
3 . 0.475 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 105846 |===================================================================
2 . 97126 |=============================================================
3 . 97390 |==============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.945 |==============================================================
2 . 1.030 |====================================================================
3 . 1.027 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 114719 |===================================================================
2 . 85968 |==================================================
3 . 112154 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.179 |===================================================
2 . 2.908 |====================================================================
3 . 2.229 |====================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 283 |======================================================================
2 . 268 |==================================================================
3 . 269 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 176.57 |================================================================
2 . 186.28 |===================================================================
3 . 186.14 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 80382 |================================================================
2 . 85853 |====================================================================
3 . 81089 |================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 6.220 |====================================================================
2 . 5.824 |================================================================
3 . 6.166 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 20303 |====================================================================
2 . 20327 |====================================================================
3 . 20251 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.049 |====================================================================
2 . 0.049 |====================================================================
3 . 0.049 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 267 |======================================================================
2 . 258 |====================================================================
3 . 258 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 373.88 |=================================================================
2 . 387.55 |===================================================================
3 . 387.27 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 222 |======================================================================
2 . 216 |====================================================================
3 . 218 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1127.67 |================================================================
2 . 1157.08 |==================================================================
3 . 1148.84 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 216 |======================================================================
2 . 207 |===================================================================
3 . 191 |==============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2312.02 |==========================================================
2 . 2418.73 |=============================================================
3 . 2611.65 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 192 |======================================================================
2 . 182 |==================================================================
3 . 186 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 5.203 |================================================================
2 . 5.494 |====================================================================
3 . 5.363 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 104848 |===================================================================
2 . 103732 |==================================================================
3 . 103960 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.477 |===================================================================
2 . 0.482 |====================================================================
3 . 0.481 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 93793 |====================================================================
2 . 93903 |====================================================================
3 . 93919 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.066 |====================================================================
2 . 1.065 |====================================================================
3 . 1.065 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 110441 |===================================================================
2 . 87563 |=====================================================
3 . 80314 |=================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.264 |=================================================
2 . 2.855 |==============================================================
3 . 3.113 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 3442 |=====================================================================
2 . 3314 |==================================================================
3 . 3293 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 14.53 |=================================================================
2 . 15.09 |====================================================================
3 . 15.18 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 75447 |===================================================================
2 . 76208 |====================================================================
3 . 74575 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 6.627 |===================================================================
2 . 6.561 |===================================================================
3 . 6.705 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4368 |=====================================================================
2 . 4171 |==================================================================
3 . 4178 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 22.89 |=================================================================
2 . 23.97 |====================================================================
3 . 23.93 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4726 |=====================================================================
2 . 4523 |==================================================================
3 . 4607 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 52.90 |=================================================================
2 . 55.28 |====================================================================
3 . 54.27 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 4480 |=====================================================================
2 . 4411 |====================================================================
3 . 4359 |===================================================================
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 64
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 213 |======================================================================
2 . 204 |===================================================================
3 . 204 |===================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2.46 |=====================================================================
2 . 2.46 |=====================================================================
3 . 2.46 |=====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.84 |====================================================================
2 . 0.85 |=====================================================================
3 . 0.84 |====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3.62 |=====================================================================
2 . 3.62 |=====================================================================
3 . 3.62 |=====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 4.16 |=====================================================================
2 . 4.13 |=====================================================================
3 . 4.16 |=====================================================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 940.5 |====================================================================
2 . 933.5 |===================================================================
3 . 940.5 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 111.60 |=================================================================
2 . 113.35 |==================================================================
3 . 114.70 |===================================================================