1280 september Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS) and ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-051300-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1851.53 |================================================================== 2 . 1859.38 |================================================================== 3 . 1853.16 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1782.52 |================================================================== 2 . 1777.56 |================================================================== 3 . 1778.47 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1754.23 |================================================================== 2 . 1757.68 |================================================================== 3 . 1753.80 |================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1250.93 |================================================================== 2 . 1258.11 |================================================================== 3 . 1258.38 |================================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 213 |====================================================================== 2 . 204 |=================================================================== 3 . 204 |=================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 617.18 |================================================================== 2 . 621.60 |=================================================================== 3 . 622.12 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.65 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.65 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.65 |===================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 689 |================================================================== 2 . 717 |===================================================================== 3 . 728 |====================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 800 |==================================================================== 2 . 799 |==================================================================== 3 . 819 |====================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 800 x 600 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 8790 |===================================================================== 2 . 8828 |===================================================================== 3 . 8807 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 3158 |===================================================================== 2 . 3097 |==================================================================== 3 . 3155 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 4548 |===================================================================== 2 . 4548 |===================================================================== 3 . 4545 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1024 x 768 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 6660 |===================================================================== 2 . 6658 |===================================================================== 3 . 6672 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 32 |======================================================================= 2 . 32 |======================================================================= 3 . 32 |======================================================================= OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 13 |======================================================================= 2 . 13 |======================================================================= 3 . 13 |======================================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 226.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 226.17 |=================================================================== 3 . 226.03 |=================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 219.65 |=================================================================== 2 . 218.56 |=================================================================== 3 . 218.77 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.96 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.92 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.95 |===================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1289113570 |=============================================================== 2 . 1289738880 |=============================================================== 3 . 1288169600 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.049 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.049 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.049 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 20303 |==================================================================== 2 . 20327 |==================================================================== 3 . 20251 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.627 |=================================================================== 2 . 6.561 |=================================================================== 3 . 6.705 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 75447 |=================================================================== 2 . 76208 |==================================================================== 3 . 74575 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 111.60 |================================================================= 2 . 113.35 |================================================================== 3 . 114.70 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4480 |===================================================================== 2 . 4411 |==================================================================== 3 . 4359 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.264 |================================================= 2 . 2.855 |============================================================== 3 . 3.113 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 110441 |=================================================================== 2 . 87563 |===================================================== 3 . 80314 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.89 |================================================================= 2 . 23.97 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.93 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4368 |===================================================================== 2 . 4171 |================================================================== 3 . 4178 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 52.90 |================================================================= 2 . 55.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 54.27 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4726 |===================================================================== 2 . 4523 |================================================================== 3 . 4607 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.477 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.482 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.481 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 104848 |=================================================================== 2 . 103732 |================================================================== 3 . 103960 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.203 |================================================================ 2 . 5.494 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.363 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 192 |====================================================================== 2 . 182 |================================================================== 3 . 186 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.066 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.065 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.065 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 93793 |==================================================================== 2 . 93903 |==================================================================== 3 . 93919 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.53 |================================================================= 2 . 15.09 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.18 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3442 |===================================================================== 2 . 3314 |================================================================== 3 . 3293 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2312.02 |========================================================== 2 . 2418.73 |============================================================= 3 . 2611.65 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 216 |====================================================================== 2 . 207 |=================================================================== 3 . 191 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1127.67 |================================================================ 2 . 1157.08 |================================================================== 3 . 1148.84 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 222 |====================================================================== 2 . 216 |==================================================================== 3 . 218 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.046 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.047 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.047 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 21660 |==================================================================== 2 . 21058 |================================================================== 3 . 21224 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 373.88 |================================================================= 2 . 387.55 |=================================================================== 3 . 387.27 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 267 |====================================================================== 2 . 258 |==================================================================== 3 . 258 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.179 |=================================================== 2 . 2.908 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.229 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 114719 |=================================================================== 2 . 85968 |================================================== 3 . 112154 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 176.57 |================================================================ 2 . 186.28 |=================================================================== 3 . 186.14 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 283 |====================================================================== 2 . 268 |================================================================== 3 . 269 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.220 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.824 |================================================================ 3 . 6.166 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 80382 |================================================================ 2 . 85853 |==================================================================== 3 . 81089 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.945 |============================================================== 2 . 1.030 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.027 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 105846 |=================================================================== 2 . 97126 |============================================================= 3 . 97390 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.957 |================================================================== 2 . 5.031 |=================================================================== 3 . 5.096 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 202 |====================================================================== 2 . 199 |===================================================================== 3 . 196 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.477 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.476 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.475 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 104905 |=================================================================== 2 . 104973 |=================================================================== 3 . 105331 |=================================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 392182.99 |================================================================ 2 . 391220.73 |================================================================ 3 . 392540.52 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35600.59 |================================================================= 2 . 35871.19 |================================================================= 3 . 35538.42 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 36343.73 |================================================================ 2 . 36830.50 |================================================================= 3 . 36241.07 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 190259.53 |================================================================ 2 . 190874.18 |================================================================ 3 . 190001.20 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 199292.40 |================================================================ 2 . 199530.09 |================================================================ 3 . 198769.79 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35052.74 |================================================================ 2 . 35561.23 |================================================================= 3 . 35056.76 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 39587.58 |================================================================= 2 . 39595.90 |================================================================= 3 . 39272.69 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 41670.30 |================================================================= 2 . 41388.93 |================================================================= 3 . 41273.91 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 210048.45 |================================================================ 2 . 210467.12 |================================================================ 3 . 210648.02 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 11863.39 |================================================================ 2 . 11979.64 |================================================================= 3 . 11602.85 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 206009.87 |================================================================ 2 . 206736.32 |================================================================ 3 . 205536.61 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 206208.88 |================================================================ 2 . 206269.47 |================================================================ 3 . 205578.16 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 40250.27 |================================================================= 2 . 40422.98 |================================================================= 3 . 39754.37 |================================================================ simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.62 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.62 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.62 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.16 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.13 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.16 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19.87 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.93 |==================================================================== 3 . 19.91 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45.02 |================================================================== 2 . 46.69 |==================================================================== 3 . 46.32 |=================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.46 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.46 |===================================================================== 3 . 2.46 |===================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 74698.5 |================================================================== 2 . 74593.7 |================================================================== 3 . 74510.6 |================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1134.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 1130.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 1134.5 |=================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.84 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.85 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.84 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 247.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 249.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 248.13 |=================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P1B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 46.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.30 |================================================================== 3 . 45.49 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 136.87 |================================================================= 2 . 138.66 |================================================================== 3 . 141.54 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 88.09 |==================================================================== 2 . 88.49 |==================================================================== 3 . 88.50 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 317.66 |================================================================= 2 . 326.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 324.79 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5563.71 |================================================================ 2 . 5707.58 |================================================================== 3 . 5649.68 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10730 |==================================================================== 2 . 10550 |=================================================================== 3 . 10690 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 134120 |=================================================================== 2 . 132950 |================================================================== 3 . 134680 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26690 |================================================================ 2 . 28420 |==================================================================== 3 . 26440 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 838.13 |================================================================= 2 . 866.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 857.73 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5372.40 |================================================================= 2 . 5406.22 |================================================================== 3 . 5441.67 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 974.56 |================================================================== 2 . 956.60 |================================================================= 3 . 987.08 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3792.80 |================================================================== 2 . 3809.95 |================================================================== 3 . 3803.65 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16660 |=================================================================== 2 . 16640 |=================================================================== 3 . 16880 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 125.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 125.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 121.47 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 18870 |==================================================================== 2 . 18900 |==================================================================== 3 . 18840 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 97.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 98.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 98.07 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 87.71 |==================================================================== 2 . 87.99 |==================================================================== 3 . 88.09 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.80 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23764140.76 |============================================================== 2 . 23809158.49 |============================================================== 3 . 23695429.77 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1083.49 |================================================================== 2 . 906.77 |======================================================= 3 . 1021.84 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7671.48 |================================================================= 2 . 7766.33 |================================================================== 3 . 7642.45 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 161.50 |=================================================================== 2 . 146.83 |============================================================= 3 . 150.53 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 804.62 |=================================================================== 2 . 802.03 |=================================================================== 3 . 803.31 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 256.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 252.02 |================================================================== 3 . 253.43 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3015441.38 |=============================================================== 2 . 3025124.91 |=============================================================== 3 . 3020209.37 |=============================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 609.82 |=================================================================== 2 . 609.77 |=================================================================== 3 . 613.93 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3873.50 |================================================================== 2 . 3884.17 |================================================================== 3 . 3839.11 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17822.74 |================================================================ 2 . 17974.20 |================================================================= 3 . 17591.60 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 60.07 |==================================================================== 2 . 60.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 59.87 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 238069.10 |=============================================================== 2 . 239989.67 |================================================================ 3 . 230993.43 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1306722.72 |=============================================================== 2 . 1316431.03 |=============================================================== 3 . 1312953.17 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13106.11 |================================================================= 2 . 13106.60 |================================================================= 3 . 13110.25 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 546967.30 |================================================================ 2 . 530845.07 |============================================================== 3 . 542767.44 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 55968.81 |================================================================= 2 . 55856.05 |================================================================= 3 . 56016.85 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 24420.06 |================================================================= 2 . 24568.73 |================================================================= 3 . 24257.96 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 172213.38 |======================================================== 2 . 185702.22 |============================================================ 3 . 196749.42 |================================================================ JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 57.38 |==================================================================== 3 . 57.00 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 55.62 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.10 |=================================================================== 3 . 55.65 |==================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.85 |================================================================== 2 . 18.53 |==================================================================== 3 . 17.91 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 22.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 23.15 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 294.22 |================================================================= 2 . 301.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 301.49 |=================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 97.7 |===================================================================== 2 . 97.5 |===================================================================== 3 . 97.6 |===================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 940.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 933.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 940.5 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 1.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 745.3 |================================================================== 2 . 719.8 |================================================================ 3 . 770.7 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 883.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 876.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 859.9 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring