tr 3970X September AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core testing with a MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 4GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 4GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 4GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 535.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 539.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 535.6 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 1.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 788.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 778.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 790.4 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 989.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 983.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 984.4 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 124.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 124.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 122.0 |=================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 800 x 600 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 13545 |==================================================================== 2 . 13505 |==================================================================== 3 . 13549 |==================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1024 x 768 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 9908 |===================================================================== 2 . 9943 |===================================================================== 3 . 9943 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 6877 |===================================================================== 2 . 6861 |===================================================================== 3 . 6871 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 4938 |===================================================================== 2 . 4939 |===================================================================== 3 . 4937 |===================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1118 |============================================================== 2 . 1236 |===================================================================== 3 . 1226 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1132 |================================================================ 2 . 1198 |==================================================================== 3 . 1217 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.87 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.94 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.00 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.01 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.84 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.86 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.86 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.33 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.32 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.32 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 72.59 |==================================================================== 2 . 72.01 |=================================================================== 3 . 71.78 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12.13 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 11.89 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.91 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.90 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94.34 |==================================================================== 2 . 92.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 91.28 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94.28 |==================================================================== 2 . 92.58 |=================================================================== 3 . 91.34 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 33.02 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.61 |=================================================================== 3 . 32.35 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.69 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.26 |================================================================== 3 . 55.49 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 229.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 226.73 |================================================================== 3 . 226.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 853.73 |=================================================================== 2 . 854.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 859.77 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 379.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 375.72 |================================================================== 3 . 376.59 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 935.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 935.83 |=================================================================== 3 . 939.31 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 666.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 659.16 |================================================================== 3 . 662.87 |=================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 134 |====================================================================== 2 . 133 |===================================================================== 3 . 133 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 75 |======================================================================= 2 . 74 |====================================================================== 3 . 75 |======================================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 728.27 |=================================================================== 2 . 727.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 726.61 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 38.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.46 |================================================================== 3 . 37.40 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 258.76 |=================================================================== 2 . 257.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 258.92 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 311.08 |=================================================================== 2 . 311.13 |=================================================================== 3 . 296.44 |================================================================ FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.48 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 14.51 |==================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 30.10 |==================================================================== 2 . 30.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 30.31 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 824.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 823.87 |=================================================================== 3 . 818.44 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1288.89 |================================================================== 2 . 1285.93 |================================================================== 3 . 1274.39 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 807.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 801.23 |================================================================== 3 . 809.94 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22850 |=================================================================== 2 . 22850 |=================================================================== 3 . 23070 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3814.16 |================================================================= 2 . 3844.91 |================================================================== 3 . 3753.90 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 816190 |================================================================== 2 . 822120 |================================================================== 3 . 828570 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5627.67 |================================================================== 2 . 5591.57 |================================================================== 3 . 5607.67 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 202990 |=================================================================== 2 . 199070 |================================================================== 3 . 201630 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10260.00 |================================================================= 2 . 10094.64 |================================================================ 3 . 9895.31 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 62080 |================================================================== 2 . 63720 |==================================================================== 3 . 63350 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 199510 |=================================================================== 2 . 200060 |=================================================================== 3 . 196670 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 360310 |=================================================================== 2 . 354980 |================================================================== 3 . 362190 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 34054255300 |============================================================== 2 . 34096594567 |============================================================== 3 . 33688404070 |============================================================= OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7112.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 7060.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 7103.8 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 458132.4 |================================================================= 2 . 455584.0 |================================================================= 3 . 458433.3 |================================================================= KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 502176.30 |================================================================ 2 . 501089.08 |================================================================ 3 . 492334.12 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 964118 |=================================================================== 2 . 940338 |================================================================= 3 . 944273 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.053 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.053 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 861326 |=================================================================== 2 . 854408 |================================================================== 3 . 851965 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.116 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.117 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.117 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 919827 |=================================================================== 2 . 907647 |================================================================== 3 . 917892 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.272 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.276 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.272 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1506 |===================================================================== 2 . 1510 |===================================================================== 3 . 1028 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.20 |============================================== 2 . 33.11 |============================================== 3 . 48.65 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 919003 |=================================================================== 2 . 898174 |================================================================= 3 . 907248 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.544 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.556 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.551 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1413 |===================================================================== 2 . 1414 |===================================================================== 3 . 931 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 70.76 |============================================ 2 . 70.73 |============================================ 3 . 107.43 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1113 |===================================================================== 2 . 1044 |================================================================= 3 . 924 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 224.60 |======================================================== 2 . 240.05 |=========================================================== 3 . 270.57 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 729 |============================================================== 2 . 716 |============================================================= 3 . 817 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 685.97 |================================================================= 2 . 710.58 |=================================================================== 3 . 612.26 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 915454 |=================================================================== 2 . 900444 |================================================================== 3 . 904661 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.055 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.055 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.055 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 819748 |=================================================================== 2 . 804478 |================================================================== 3 . 810642 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.122 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.124 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.123 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 869988 |=================================================================== 2 . 862803 |================================================================== 3 . 860224 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.287 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.290 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.291 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 30696 |==================================================================== 2 . 8276 |================== 3 . 7593 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.629 |================= 2 . 6.112 |=============================================================== 3 . 6.585 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 853580 |=================================================================== 2 . 849485 |=================================================================== 3 . 842778 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.586 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.588 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.593 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 677026 |================================================================== 2 . 659245 |================================================================ 3 . 691591 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.074 |================================================================== 2 . 0.076 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.072 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 42707 |==================================================================== 2 . 11561 |================== 3 . 10939 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.342 |================= 2 . 8.830 |================================================================== 3 . 9.142 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 39832 |==================================================================== 2 . 13218 |======================= 3 . 12351 |===================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.276 |===================== 2 . 18.922 |=============================================================== 3 . 20.241 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 16043 |==================================================================== 2 . 13959 |=========================================================== 3 . 13300 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.17 |======================================================== 2 . 35.84 |================================================================= 3 . 37.59 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 645334 |=================================================================== 2 . 634493 |================================================================== 3 . 638031 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.155 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.158 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.157 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 677831 |=================================================================== 2 . 673041 |=================================================================== 3 . 673571 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.369 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.371 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.371 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 7625 |===================================================================== 2 . 7547 |==================================================================== 3 . 6708 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.558 |============================================================ 2 . 6.626 |============================================================ 3 . 7.453 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 620160 |================================================================== 2 . 630501 |=================================================================== 3 . 611738 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.806 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.793 |================================================================== 3 . 0.817 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11675 |==================================================================== 2 . 11574 |=================================================================== 3 . 10565 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.565 |============================================================== 2 . 8.640 |============================================================== 3 . 9.465 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 16001 |==================================================================== 2 . 14855 |=============================================================== 3 . 12769 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.62 |====================================================== 2 . 16.83 |========================================================== 3 . 19.58 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11292 |=================================================================== 2 . 11415 |==================================================================== 3 . 10811 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 44.28 |================================================================= 2 . 44.08 |================================================================= 3 . 46.25 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 494.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 490.58 |================================================================== 3 . 495.65 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 648.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 643.26 |================================================================== 3 . 638.02 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1016.18 |================================================================== 2 . 1013.12 |================================================================== 3 . 1009.45 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 413672.79 |================================================================ 2 . 412647.38 |================================================================ 3 . 410567.90 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7102.89 |================================================================== 2 . 7070.77 |================================================================== 3 . 7086.31 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 550763568.58 |============================================================= 2 . 545082943.79 |============================================================ 3 . 546750654.47 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 43341.58 |================================================================= 2 . 42502.81 |================================================================ 3 . 42414.19 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 504712.61 |================================================================ 2 . 503395.23 |================================================================ 3 . 503610.25 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 185.14 |================================================================ 2 . 181.43 |============================================================== 3 . 195.21 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 63761.29 |================================================================ 2 . 65151.23 |================================================================= 3 . 62571.07 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3551588.28 |=============================================================== 2 . 3504696.10 |============================================================== 3 . 3498344.57 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 129631.87 |================================================================ 2 . 129258.43 |================================================================ 3 . 128942.56 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 100256.35 |================================================================ 2 . 99437.18 |=============================================================== 3 . 100146.51 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6185.02 |================================================================== 2 . 6164.88 |================================================================== 3 . 6160.73 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16314.59 |================================================================= 2 . 16013.82 |================================================================ 3 . 16256.42 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12963646.85 |============================================================== 2 . 12926669.76 |============================================================== 3 . 13002346.84 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1790088.04 |=============================================================== 2 . 1767098.07 |============================================================== 3 . 1787579.85 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 403.07 |================================================================== 2 . 408.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 407.83 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5169217.46 |=============================================================== 2 . 5167656.26 |=============================================================== 3 . 5170844.05 |=============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 365 |====================================================================== 2 . 364 |====================================================================== 3 . 363 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 668 |====================================================================== 2 . 666 |====================================================================== 3 . 658 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 173 |===================================================================== 2 . 175 |====================================================================== 3 . 168 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 16300 |==================================================================== 2 . 16287 |==================================================================== 3 . 16156 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 6529 |===================================================================== 2 . 6484 |===================================================================== 3 . 6482 |===================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P1B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 42.36 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.31 |========================================================== 3 . 36.04 |========================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 694.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 699.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 697.18 |=================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 725.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 725.58 |=================================================================== 3 . 728.86 |=================================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 71727.71 |================================================================ 2 . 72755.86 |================================================================= 3 . 72669.77 |================================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 206775.08 |================================================================ 2 . 204711.92 |=============================================================== 3 . 205015.30 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 204771.42 |================================================================ 2 . 202026.33 |=============================================================== 3 . 202192.68 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 205217.13 |================================================================ 2 . 202977.02 |=============================================================== 3 . 202808.91 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 204772.16 |================================================================ 2 . 202414.10 |=============================================================== 3 . 201932.12 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 201608.07 |================================================================ 2 . 199120.24 |=============================================================== 3 . 198326.26 |=============================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8748.57 |================================================================== 2 . 8432.81 |================================================================ 3 . 8547.75 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 53441.09 |================================================================= 2 . 51338.75 |============================================================== 3 . 51754.56 |=============================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 100763.44 |================================================================ 2 . 99860.84 |=============================================================== 3 . 100741.06 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 93873.26 |================================================================ 2 . 93398.10 |=============================================================== 3 . 95628.35 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 87018.19 |================================================================= 2 . 85375.60 |================================================================ 3 . 87038.98 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 84967.20 |================================================================= 2 . 83701.32 |================================================================ 3 . 84994.31 |=================================================================