eo sep AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 436.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 437.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 438.03 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 462.35 |=================================================================== 2 . 464.02 |=================================================================== 3 . 463.19 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.22 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.13 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.21 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 647.73 |=================================================================== 2 . 648.79 |=================================================================== 3 . 640.94 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 398.63 |================================================================= 2 . 412.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 395.84 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11480 |==================================================================== 2 . 11460 |==================================================================== 3 . 11500 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2713.37 |================================================================== 2 . 2639.29 |================================================================ 3 . 2702.54 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 458600 |=================================================================== 2 . 456727 |=================================================================== 3 . 451920 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2843.57 |================================================================== 2 . 2798.47 |================================================================= 3 . 2808.51 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105920 |=================================================================== 2 . 106377 |=================================================================== 3 . 106430 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14890 |============================================================== 2 . 14848 |============================================================= 3 . 16440 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 31520 |==================================================================== 2 . 31347 |=================================================================== 3 . 31580 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 103590 |=================================================================== 2 . 103293 |=================================================================== 3 . 101950 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 211520 |=================================================================== 2 . 209610 |================================================================== 3 . 208580 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 462669 |=================================================================== 2 . 460233 |=================================================================== 3 . 459516 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.108 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.109 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.109 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 497302 |=================================================================== 2 . 494553 |=================================================================== 3 . 495937 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.201 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.202 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.202 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 497392 |=================================================================== 2 . 494008 |=================================================================== 3 . 488996 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.503 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.506 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.511 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1543 |===================================================================== 2 . 1541 |===================================================================== 3 . 864 |======================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.39 |====================================== 2 . 32.46 |====================================== 3 . 57.90 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 433773 |=================================================================== 2 . 432070 |=================================================================== 3 . 432957 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.153 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.157 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.155 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 9 |= 2 . 773 |============================================================== 3 . 868 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10872.09 |================================================================= 2 . 132.01 |= 3 . 115.17 |= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 7 |= 2 . 671 |====================================================================== 3 . 585 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 33571.61 |================================================================= 2 . 374.42 |= 3 . 427.42 |= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 8 |= 2 . 480 |============================================================= 3 . 551 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 60577.94 |================================================================= 2 . 1071.60 |= 3 . 907.02 |= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 432995 |=================================================================== 2 . 431528 |=================================================================== 3 . 429829 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.115 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.116 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.116 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 474524 |=================================================================== 2 . 473818 |=================================================================== 3 . 469334 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.211 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.211 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.213 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 456849 |=================================================================== 2 . 458054 |=================================================================== 3 . 457995 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.547 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.546 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.546 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 132 |= 2 . 6152 |=========================================================== 3 . 7191 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 377.732 |================================================================== 2 . 8.142 |= 3 . 6.953 |= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 398838 |=================================================================== 2 . 392528 |================================================================== 3 . 393367 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.254 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.274 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.271 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 8670 |===================================================================== 2 . 8588 |==================================================================== 3 . 8364 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.53 |================================================================== 2 . 11.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 11.96 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 10013 |==================================================================== 2 . 9955 |==================================================================== 3 . 9842 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 25.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 25.40 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 10251 |=================================================================== 2 . 10443 |==================================================================== 3 . 10059 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 48.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 47.88 |================================================================= 3 . 49.71 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 296.95 |=================================================================== 2 . 294.76 |=================================================================== 3 . 294.01 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 313.58 |================================================================== 2 . 317.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 314.23 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 854.12 |=================================================================== 2 . 851.15 |=================================================================== 3 . 847.34 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 576831.95 |================================================================ 2 . 580205.54 |================================================================ 3 . 572863.40 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3593.04 |================================================================== 2 . 3573.67 |================================================================== 3 . 3566.70 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 188292500.76 |============================================================= 2 . 186872332.78 |============================================================= 3 . 186863081.37 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 49396.14 |================================================================= 2 . 48781.92 |================================================================ 3 . 49289.10 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 80785.33 |============================================================ 2 . 87097.29 |================================================================= 3 . 72136.71 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 287330.30 |================================================================ 2 . 286068.51 |================================================================ 3 . 286568.14 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 171.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 164.95 |================================================================ 3 . 162.76 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 33376.13 |================================================================ 2 . 33683.66 |================================================================= 3 . 33549.51 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1804096.99 |=============================================================== 2 . 1817674.92 |=============================================================== 3 . 1807791.29 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 54914.37 |============================================================== 2 . 56514.89 |================================================================ 3 . 57795.57 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 50010.20 |================================================================= 2 . 49754.93 |================================================================= 3 . 49878.43 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4926.62 |================================================================== 2 . 4915.34 |================================================================== 3 . 4925.63 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9254.67 |================================================================== 2 . 9127.43 |================================================================= 3 . 9168.22 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6396508.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 6355876.58 |=============================================================== 3 . 6301652.00 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 888334.15 |================================================================ 2 . 875531.68 |=============================================================== 3 . 889166.54 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 218.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 217.58 |=================================================================== 3 . 218.73 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3924603.72 |=============================================================== 2 . 3933850.74 |=============================================================== 3 . 3919559.65 |===============================================================