10700t so okt Intel Core i7-10700T testing with a Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-34-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 142.54 |=================================================================== 2 . 143.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 139.50 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 150.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 148.54 |================================================================== 3 . 150.97 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4528.67 |=============================================================== 2 . 4738.72 |================================================================== 3 . 4534.99 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 966.21 |=============================================================== 2 . 1008.94 |================================================================== 3 . 976.94 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 167790 |=================================================================== 2 . 159340 |================================================================ 3 . 158090 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1200.43 |================================================================ 2 . 1205.07 |================================================================ 3 . 1241.50 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20800 |==================================================================== 2 . 19970 |================================================================= 3 . 20100 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6654.22 |================================================================= 2 . 6634.00 |================================================================ 3 . 6794.80 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12660 |=================================================================== 2 . 12810 |==================================================================== 3 . 12660 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22080 |================================================================= 2 . 23210 |==================================================================== 3 . 23080 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 29760 |============================================================== 2 . 30970 |================================================================= 3 . 32390 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 22308 |==================================================================== 2 . 22155 |==================================================================== 3 . 22020 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 373 |====================================================================== 2 . 375 |====================================================================== 3 . 375 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 150502 |=================================================================== 2 . 149673 |=================================================================== 3 . 149455 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 147552 |=================================================================== 2 . 148189 |=================================================================== 3 . 148450 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 138872 |=================================================================== 2 . 138157 |=================================================================== 3 . 138654 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 482 |====================================================================== 2 . 483 |====================================================================== 3 . 482 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 136249 |=================================================================== 2 . 135704 |=================================================================== 3 . 136431 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 21177 |================================================================== 2 . 21724 |==================================================================== 3 . 21564 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 444 |===================================================================== 2 . 443 |===================================================================== 3 . 449 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 344 |================================================================= 2 . 371 |====================================================================== 3 . 362 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 304 |=============================================================== 2 . 263 |====================================================== 3 . 338 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 349 |====================================================================== 2 . 348 |====================================================================== 3 . 350 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 145004 |=================================================================== 2 . 144166 |=================================================================== 3 . 144313 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 19191 |=================================================================== 2 . 19441 |==================================================================== 3 . 19361 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 143884 |=================================================================== 2 . 143604 |=================================================================== 3 . 143851 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 132234 |=================================================================== 2 . 130763 |================================================================== 3 . 132942 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4863 |===================================================================== 2 . 4495 |================================================================ 3 . 4519 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 126469 |=================================================================== 2 . 124801 |================================================================== 3 . 125464 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 334 |====================================================================== 2 . 317 |================================================================== 3 . 326 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 130877 |=================================================================== 2 . 130986 |=================================================================== 3 . 131402 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 6165 |===================================================================== 2 . 5680 |================================================================ 3 . 5754 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 6831 |===================================================================== 2 . 6146 |============================================================== 3 . 6056 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 6844 |===================================================================== 2 . 6050 |============================================================= 3 . 5722 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 132821 |================================================================== 2 . 134422 |=================================================================== 3 . 133247 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 126667 |=================================================================== 2 . 121190 |================================================================ 3 . 125355 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2972 |================================================================= 2 . 3140 |===================================================================== 3 . 3156 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 112440 |=================================================================== 2 . 110372 |================================================================== 3 . 108460 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3168 |===================================================================== 2 . 3065 |=================================================================== 3 . 3157 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3638 |===================================================================== 2 . 3194 |============================================================= 3 . 3501 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4304 |===================================================================== 2 . 3771 |============================================================ 3 . 3536 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.045 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.045 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.045 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.678 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.663 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.666 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.332 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.334 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.335 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.678 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.675 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.674 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.800 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.810 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.803 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 103.72 |=================================================================== 2 . 103.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 103.72 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.670 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.684 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.665 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.047 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.046 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.046 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 225.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 225.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 222.64 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 727.62 |=================================================================== 2 . 673.55 |============================================================== 3 . 690.43 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1645.61 |========================================================= 2 . 1902.29 |================================================================== 3 . 1479.16 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.862 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.870 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.861 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.345 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.347 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.346 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.051 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.052 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.695 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.696 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.695 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.891 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.912 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.881 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.28 |=============================================================== 2 . 11.13 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.06 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.954 |=================================================================== 2 . 4.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.985 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.995 |================================================================= 2 . 3.153 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.071 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.382 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.382 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.381 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.22 |=============================================================== 2 . 17.61 |==================================================================== 3 . 17.38 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 36.60 |============================================================ 2 . 40.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 41.28 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 73.06 |========================================================= 2 . 82.65 |================================================================ 3 . 87.38 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.753 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.744 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.750 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.974 |================================================================= 2 . 2.063 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.994 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.82 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.92 |================================================================ 3 . 15.84 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.447 |================================================================== 2 . 4.530 |=================================================================== 3 . 4.610 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.57 |================================================================== 2 . 32.63 |==================================================================== 3 . 31.68 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 68.72 |============================================================ 2 . 78.27 |==================================================================== 3 . 71.41 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 116.18 |======================================================= 2 . 132.59 |=============================================================== 3 . 141.40 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 19.70 |==================================================================== 3 . 19.63 |====================================================================