ampere altra july Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M5SX (C220M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201720 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on Fedora 29 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 5: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M @ 3.70GHz (26 Cores), Motherboard: Cisco UCSC-C220-M5SX (C220M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201720 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 4 x 64 GB DDR4-2666MT/s M386A8K40BM2-CTD, Disk: 4 x 800GB WUSTR6480ASS200 + 3198GB UCSC-RAID12G-2GB, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: 5 x Cisco VIC NIC OS: Fedora 29, Kernel: 5.3.11-100.fc29.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.1 20190223, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 9884.0 |====================== 2 ......................... 10400.7 |======================= 3 ......................... 11459.2 |========================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 19119.9 |========================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 1335.1 |=========================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 899.1 |============================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 1100.0 |=========================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 821.8 |================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 12148.8 |========================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 7622.5 |========================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 2413.1 |=========================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 1650.0 |============================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 1191.7 |=========================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 901.1 |================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 46200000 |================= 2 ......................... 46500000 |================= 3 ......................... 46300000 |================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 111100000 |======================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 168.1 |=========================== 2 ......................... 176.5 |============================ 3 ......................... 176.1 |============================ Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 272.7 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 60.2 |========================= 2 ......................... 61.5 |========================== 3 ......................... 61.4 |========================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 104.3 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 180.5 |============================= 2 ......................... 180.7 |============================= 3 ......................... 179.8 |============================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 273.3 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 89.2 |========================== 2 ......................... 89.4 |========================== 3 ......................... 88.9 |========================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 153.1 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 190.3 |=========================== 2 ......................... 190.0 |=========================== 3 ......................... 190.2 |=========================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 305.4 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 64.7 |========================= 2 ......................... 64.4 |========================= 3 ......................... 64.5 |========================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 114.8 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 193.1 |============================ 2 ......................... 192.8 |============================ 3 ......................... 193.3 |============================ Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 301.8 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 98.2 |======================= 2 ......................... 97.7 |======================= 3 ......................... 97.8 |======================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 187.8 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 15.4 |======= 2 ......................... 15.4 |======= 3 ......................... 15.4 |======= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 97.1 |============================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 8.3 |====== 2 ......................... 8.3 |====== 3 ......................... 8.3 |====== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 58.0 |============================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 15.9 |====== 2 ......................... 15.9 |====== 3 ......................... 15.9 |====== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 113.6 |============================================ srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 15.3 |========= 2 ......................... 15.3 |========= 3 ......................... 15.3 |========= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 80.1 |============================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 1.24 |============= 2 ......................... 1.44 |=============== 3 ......................... 1.32 |============== 5 ......................... 1.41 |=============== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 4.33 |============================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 6.35 |======================= 2 ......................... 5.47 |==================== 3 ......................... 6.23 |======================= 5 ......................... 5.11 |=================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 11.94 |============================================ VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 3.59 |================= 2 ......................... 3.67 |================= 3 ......................... 3.45 |================ 5 ......................... 3.85 |================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 9.60 |============================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 11.70 |======================= 2 ......................... 11.54 |======================= 3 ......................... 11.54 |======================= 5 ......................... 11.60 |======================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 22.22 |============================================ Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 19.35 |==================== 2 ......................... 19.22 |==================== 3 ......................... 16.61 |================= 5 ......................... 16.64 |================= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 42.80 |============================================ Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 57.23 |=================================== 2 ......................... 67.06 |========================================= 3 ......................... 72.27 |============================================ 5 ......................... 60.84 |===================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 63.27 |======================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 267306 |=================================================================== 2 . 60927 |=============== 3 . 168876 |========================================== 5 . 186120 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.854 |================================= 2 . 1.748 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.039 |======================================== 5 . 0.962 |===================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 183024 |============================================================ 2 . 177869 |=========================================================== 3 . 199912 |================================================================== 5 . 203064 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.759 |================================================================= 2 . 2.880 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.542 |============================================================ 5 . 2.529 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1638 |===================================================================== 2 . 1608 |=================================================================== 3 . 1632 |==================================================================== 5 . 1646 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 61.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 62.20 |==================================================================== 3 . 61.29 |=================================================================== 5 . 60.77 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 983 |============================================================== 2 . 1088 |===================================================================== 3 . 1040 |================================================================== 5 . 1067 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 254.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 229.84 |============================================================= 3 . 240.55 |=============================================================== 5 . 234.38 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 56586 |=================================================== 2 . 75875 |==================================================================== 3 . 56426 |=================================================== 5 . 61952 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.768 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.318 |=================================================== 3 . 1.773 |==================================================================== 5 . 1.615 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 101602 |================================================== 2 . 61143 |============================== 3 . 135601 |=================================================================== 5 . 105314 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.572 |==================================================== 2 . 4.715 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.415 |================================================= 5 . 3.805 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11130 |================================================ 2 . 15832 |==================================================================== 3 . 15024 |================================================================= 5 . 12252 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.987 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.318 |================================================ 3 . 6.658 |================================================== 5 . 8.164 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 8065 |============================================================= 2 . 8007 |============================================================= 3 . 9013 |==================================================================== 5 . 9088 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.02 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.24 |==================================================================== 3 . 27.76 |============================================================ 5 . 27.52 |============================================================ TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 2988.51 |=============================== 2 ......................... 2724.29 |============================ 3 ......................... 2965.88 |============================== 5 ......................... 2674.01 |=========================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 4093.18 |========================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 321.78 |=================================== 2 ......................... 301.44 |================================ 3 ......................... 308.87 |================================= 5 ......................... 299.06 |================================ Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 398.84 |=========================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 79.29 |======================================== 2 ......................... 79.27 |======================================== 3 ......................... 79.24 |======================================== 5 ......................... 79.05 |======================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 87.32 |============================================ TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 255.13 |============================== 2 ......................... 254.80 |============================== 3 ......................... 255.54 |============================== 5 ......................... 253.08 |============================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 366.05 |=========================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 102317 |===== 2 ......................... 89024 |===== 3 ......................... 79450 |==== 5 ......................... 76856 |==== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 838864 |=========================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 881850287 |======================================== 2 ......................... 878651588 |======================================== 3 ......................... 865616372 |======================================= 5 ......................... 879053806 |======================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 93748137 |==== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 83650 |==== 2 ......................... 85897 |==== 3 ......................... 81501 |==== 5 ......................... 88714 |==== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 863673 |=========================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 75182 |== 2 ......................... 75382 |== 3 ......................... 65153 |== 5 ......................... 63557 |== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 1280917 |========================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 4612806 |================================ 2 ......................... 5125113 |==================================== 3 ......................... 5973869 |========================================== 5 ......................... 5258565 |===================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 2911809 |==================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 ......................... 740904 |============ 2 ......................... 732841 |============ 3 ......................... 719729 |============ 5 ......................... 751640 |============= Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 2521651 |========================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 ......................... 466.63 |================================== 2 ......................... 467.91 |================================== 3 ......................... 466.08 |================================== 5 ......................... 471.45 |================================== Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M . 598.20 |===========================================