testopenjdk

testcorretto

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109213-IB-2109211IB22
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 3 Tests
Java 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
testopenjdk
September 21
  4 Hours, 12 Minutes
testcorretto
September 21
  1 Hour, 31 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 52 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


testopenjdkOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Intel Xeon X5660 @ 2.80GHz (6 Cores / 8 Threads)HP ProLiant DL360 G6 (P64 BIOS)4096MB147GB LOGICAL VOLUME + 500GB LOGICAL VOLUME + 500GB SAMSUNG HD502HI + 5 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AADS-0 + 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKX-6 + 500GB Seagate ST3500418ASradeondrmfbDebian GNU/Linux 115.11.22-4-pve (x86_64)GCC 10.2.1 20210110ext41024x768lxcProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSystem LayerTestopenjdk BenchmarksSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- Scaling Governor: pcc-cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x1f- testopenjdk: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17-ea+19-Debian-1)- testcorretto: OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-17.0.0.35.1 (build 17+35-LTS)- itlb_multihit: KVM: Vulnerable + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: vulnerable + mds: Vulnerable; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Vulnerable + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers + spectre_v2: Vulnerable IBPB: disabled STIBP: disabled + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

testopenjdk vs. testcorretto ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+13.2%+13.2%+26.4%+26.4%+39.6%+39.6%52.6%5.4%4.4%3.3%F.E.TScala DottyJ.S.O.RF.F.T4.1%JythonSavina Reactors.IO2.8%A.U.C.T2.6%H22.3%Bork File EncrypterRenaissanceJava SciMarkJava SciMarkDaCapo BenchmarkRenaissanceRenaissanceDaCapo Benchmarktestopenjdktestcorretto

testopenjdkjava-scimark2: Compositejava-scimark2: Monte Carlojava-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transformjava-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyjava-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationjava-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationbork: File Encryption Timedacapobench: H2dacapobench: Jythonrenaissance: Scala Dottyrenaissance: Rand Forestrenaissance: ALS Movie Lensrenaissance: Apache Spark ALSrenaissance: Apache Spark Bayesrenaissance: Savina Reactors.IOrenaissance: Apache Spark PageRankrenaissance: Finagle HTTP Requestsrenaissance: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Treerenaissance: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futuressunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesistestopenjdktestcorretto663.27327.67363.33528.941492.33604.0943.8807085150773773.12018.020280.17428.74175.415649.19499.66602.121324.93074.55.355668.49326.34349.08524.111511.96630.9528.7567248145943579.616080.66505.821885.73089.75.302OpenBenchmarking.org

Java SciMark

This test runs the Java version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This benchmark is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Compositetestopenjdktestcorretto140280420560700SE +/- 1.95, N = 4SE +/- 4.30, N = 4663.27668.49
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Compositetestopenjdktestcorretto120240360480600Min: 659.75 / Avg: 663.27 / Max: 668.12Min: 660.7 / Avg: 668.49 / Max: 680.67

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlotestopenjdktestcorretto70140210280350SE +/- 1.92, N = 4SE +/- 3.23, N = 4327.67326.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlotestopenjdktestcorretto60120180240300Min: 323.12 / Avg: 327.67 / Max: 332.43Min: 321.19 / Avg: 326.34 / Max: 335.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transformtestopenjdktestcorretto80160240320400SE +/- 4.52, N = 4SE +/- 2.59, N = 4363.33349.08
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transformtestopenjdktestcorretto60120180240300Min: 352.51 / Avg: 363.33 / Max: 374.3Min: 343.9 / Avg: 349.08 / Max: 356.26

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiplytestopenjdktestcorretto110220330440550SE +/- 2.92, N = 4SE +/- 3.87, N = 4528.94524.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiplytestopenjdktestcorretto90180270360450Min: 520.54 / Avg: 528.94 / Max: 533.68Min: 517.05 / Avg: 524.11 / Max: 534.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtestopenjdktestcorretto30060090012001500SE +/- 5.32, N = 4SE +/- 5.92, N = 41492.331511.96
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtestopenjdktestcorretto30060090012001500Min: 1484.46 / Avg: 1492.33 / Max: 1506.99Min: 1500.37 / Avg: 1511.96 / Max: 1527.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtestopenjdktestcorretto140280420560700SE +/- 6.70, N = 4SE +/- 28.85, N = 4604.09630.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtestopenjdktestcorretto110220330440550Min: 592.36 / Avg: 604.09 / Max: 620Min: 594.74 / Avg: 630.95 / Max: 717.14

Bork File Encrypter

Bork is a small, cross-platform file encryption utility. It is written in Java and designed to be included along with the files it encrypts for long-term storage. This test measures the amount of time it takes to encrypt a sample file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption Timetestopenjdktestcorretto1020304050SE +/- 1.97, N = 15SE +/- 1.20, N = 1543.8828.76
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption Timetestopenjdktestcorretto918273645Min: 27.79 / Avg: 43.88 / Max: 59.88Min: 23.65 / Avg: 28.76 / Max: 40.76

DaCapo Benchmark

This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2testopenjdktestcorretto16003200480064008000SE +/- 62.28, N = 8SE +/- 53.43, N = 2070857248
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2testopenjdktestcorretto13002600390052006500Min: 6796 / Avg: 7084.5 / Max: 7335Min: 6959 / Avg: 7247.65 / Max: 7759

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: Jythontestopenjdktestcorretto3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 111.48, N = 20SE +/- 102.42, N = 201507714594
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: Jythontestopenjdktestcorretto3K6K9K12K15KMin: 13924 / Avg: 15076.5 / Max: 15897Min: 14105 / Avg: 14594 / Max: 16110

Renaissance

Renaissance is a suite of benchmarks designed to test the Java JVM from Apache Spark to a Twitter-like service to Scala and other features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Scala Dottytestopenjdktestcorretto8001600240032004000SE +/- 74.86, N = 9SE +/- 18.17, N = 33773.13579.6MIN: 2557.07 / MAX: 6903.09MIN: 2498.67 / MAX: 8002.44
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Scala Dottytestopenjdktestcorretto7001400210028003500Min: 3458.58 / Avg: 3773.12 / Max: 4239.81Min: 3559.14 / Avg: 3579.57 / Max: 3615.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Random Foresttestopenjdk400800120016002000SE +/- 14.62, N = 152018.0MIN: 1402 / MAX: 2830.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: ALS Movie Lenstestopenjdk4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 73.05, N = 320280.1MIN: 20038.09 / MAX: 23421.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Apache Spark ALStestopenjdk16003200480064008000SE +/- 41.47, N = 37428.7MIN: 6680.79 / MAX: 8325.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Apache Spark Bayestestopenjdk9001800270036004500SE +/- 242.57, N = 124175.4MIN: 2363.8 / MAX: 6180.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Savina Reactors.IOtestopenjdktestcorretto3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 175.86, N = 4SE +/- 101.90, N = 315649.116080.6MIN: 15234.88 / MAX: 22877.03MIN: 15933.99 / MAX: 22432.71
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Savina Reactors.IOtestopenjdktestcorretto3K6K9K12K15KMin: 15234.88 / Avg: 15649.06 / Max: 16038.77Min: 15933.99 / Avg: 16080.59 / Max: 16276.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Apache Spark PageRanktestopenjdk2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 211.67, N = 99499.6MIN: 7645.49 / MAX: 12664.28

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Finagle HTTP Requeststestopenjdktestcorretto14002800420056007000SE +/- 70.68, N = 3SE +/- 28.89, N = 36602.16505.8MIN: 5548.99 / MAX: 6848.16MIN: 5724.35 / MAX: 6654.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Finagle HTTP Requeststestopenjdktestcorretto11002200330044005500Min: 6505.77 / Avg: 6602.15 / Max: 6739.89Min: 6469.92 / Avg: 6505.75 / Max: 6562.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Treetestopenjdktestcorretto5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 123.34, N = 3SE +/- 250.70, N = 321324.921885.7MIN: 16283.12 / MAX: 21566.43MIN: 16333.01 / MAX: 22373.33
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Treetestopenjdktestcorretto4K8K12K16K20KMin: 21160.73 / Avg: 21324.88 / Max: 21566.43Min: 21540.85 / Avg: 21885.7 / Max: 22373.33

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futurestestopenjdktestcorretto7001400210028003500SE +/- 16.51, N = 3SE +/- 28.98, N = 63074.53089.7MIN: 2513.58 / MAX: 3221.1MIN: 2465.56 / MAX: 3265.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.12Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futurestestopenjdktestcorretto5001000150020002500Min: 3042.08 / Avg: 3074.52 / Max: 3096.12Min: 2956.44 / Avg: 3089.66 / Max: 3145.52

Sunflow Rendering System

This test runs benchmarks of the Sunflow Rendering System. The Sunflow Rendering System is an open-source render engine for photo-realistic image synthesis with a ray-tracing core. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image Synthesistestopenjdktestcorretto1.20492.40983.61474.81966.0245SE +/- 0.056, N = 5SE +/- 0.019, N = 35.3555.302MIN: 4.29 / MAX: 7.56MIN: 4.48 / MAX: 7.09
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image Synthesistestopenjdktestcorretto246810Min: 5.19 / Avg: 5.35 / Max: 5.54Min: 5.28 / Avg: 5.3 / Max: 5.34