testing python using pybench
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2109162-IB-OSP161BAR81.
osp16_1_baremetalProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelFile-SystemScreen Resolutionosp161baremetal2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6130 @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)Supermicro X11DDW-L v1.10 (3.0a BIOS)Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers8 x 32 GB DDR4-2666MT/s Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD512GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 480GB INTEL SSDSC2BB48ASPEED2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 4 x Intel X710 for 10GbE SFP+Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.24.18.0-193.60.2.el8_2.x86_64 (x86_64)xfs1024x768OpenBenchmarking.org- Transparent Huge Pages: always- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance - CPU Microcode: 0x2006b06- Python 3.6.8- SELinux + itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable
osp16_1_baremetalpybench: Total For Average Test TimesStandard ErrorStandard Deviationosp161baremetal15623.210.36%OpenBenchmarking.org
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test Timesosp161baremetal30060090012001500SE +/- 3.21, N = 31562
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4