Xeon Platinum 8280 2P September 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.0.1 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.0.1 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.0.1 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.0.1 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 5: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.0.1 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9887.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 9918.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 9925.6 |=================================================================== 4 . 9812.4 |================================================================== 5 . 9938.3 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 135993.11 |================================================================ 2 . 134801.51 |=============================================================== 3 . 135225.31 |================================================================ 4 . 134580.56 |=============================================================== 5 . 134287.70 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 32268.03 |================================================================= 2 . 31973.30 |================================================================ 3 . 32204.84 |================================================================= 4 . 31719.82 |================================================================ 5 . 32167.15 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5692.10 |=============================================================== 2 . 5793.59 |================================================================= 3 . 5927.11 |================================================================== 4 . 5765.80 |================================================================ 5 . 5820.90 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6302.49 |================================================================== 2 . 6202.22 |================================================================= 3 . 6138.25 |================================================================ 4 . 6198.02 |================================================================= 5 . 6299.99 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 56009.91 |================================================================ 2 . 56464.56 |================================================================= 3 . 53819.24 |============================================================== 4 . 54914.76 |=============================================================== 5 . 54252.33 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1772.21 |================================================================== 2 . 1673.25 |============================================================== 3 . 1679.03 |=============================================================== 4 . 1704.57 |=============================================================== 5 . 1650.78 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 109022.65 |================================================================ 2 . 108217.50 |================================================================ 3 . 108273.65 |================================================================ 4 . 108673.88 |================================================================ 5 . 108124.73 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 69109.18 |================================================================ 2 . 69259.54 |================================================================ 3 . 69952.84 |================================================================= 4 . 69337.52 |================================================================ 5 . 68904.37 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 70267.77 |================================================================= 2 . 69959.77 |================================================================= 3 . 70371.77 |================================================================= 4 . 70160.65 |================================================================= 5 . 69953.53 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 50199.37 |================================================================= 2 . 50413.91 |================================================================= 3 . 50066.29 |================================================================= 4 . 50203.78 |================================================================= 5 . 50298.69 |================================================================= LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3274 |============================================================ 2 . 3483 |================================================================ 3 . 3386 |============================================================== 4 . 3494 |================================================================ 5 . 3755 |===================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3085 |============================================================ 2 . 3472 |==================================================================== 3 . 3294 |================================================================ 4 . 3350 |================================================================= 5 . 3549 |===================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 333.36 |================================================================= 2 . 333.83 |================================================================== 3 . 332.83 |================================================================= 4 . 334.58 |================================================================== 5 . 341.40 |=================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.45 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.51 |===================================================================== 4 . 2.45 |=================================================================== 5 . 2.46 |==================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.86 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.85 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.86 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.86 |===================================================================== 5 . 0.86 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.66 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.66 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.66 |===================================================================== 4 . 3.67 |===================================================================== 5 . 3.66 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.20 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.23 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.21 |===================================================================== 4 . 4.21 |===================================================================== 5 . 4.21 |===================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 981.8 |================================================================= 2 . 964.5 |================================================================ 3 . 966.0 |================================================================ 4 . 1005.4 |=================================================================== 5 . 947.2 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1255.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 1205.4 |================================================================ 3 . 1199.5 |================================================================ 4 . 1235.9 |================================================================== 5 . 1148.2 |============================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15139.7 |================================================================== 2 . 15090.0 |================================================================== 3 . 15193.6 |================================================================== 4 . 15135.4 |================================================================== 5 . 15005.8 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2697.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2581.9 |================================================================ 3 . 2664.2 |================================================================== 4 . 2690.1 |=================================================================== 5 . 2684.6 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 918.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 838.1 |============================================================== 3 . 873.4 |================================================================= 4 . 854.5 |=============================================================== 5 . 856.7 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 13154.3 |======================================================= 2 . 15082.5 |=============================================================== 3 . 13975.2 |========================================================== 4 . 15864.3 |================================================================== 5 . 14413.9 |============================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4990.9 |================================================================= 2 . 4797.7 |============================================================== 3 . 4878.5 |=============================================================== 4 . 5157.6 |=================================================================== 5 . 4766.9 |============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4236.4 |=============================================================== 2 . 4202.5 |============================================================== 3 . 4355.2 |================================================================= 4 . 4296.2 |================================================================ 5 . 4512.2 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 12353.1 |=============================================================== 2 . 11897.4 |============================================================= 3 . 12224.4 |============================================================== 4 . 12704.4 |================================================================= 5 . 12929.5 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 20467.5 |================================================================= 2 . 20740.3 |================================================================== 3 . 20541.2 |================================================================= 4 . 20569.7 |================================================================= 5 . 20820.2 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6762.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 6761.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 6362.9 |=============================================================== 4 . 6700.5 |================================================================== 5 . 6591.1 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2927.3 |=================================================== 2 . 2881.6 |================================================== 3 . 2917.1 |=================================================== 4 . 3849.5 |=================================================================== 5 . 2932.7 |=================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1397.0 |======================================================== 2 . 1552.0 |============================================================== 3 . 1671.0 |=================================================================== 4 . 1566.4 |=============================================================== 5 . 1291.2 |==================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2678.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2659.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 2634.1 |================================================================== 4 . 2610.1 |================================================================= 5 . 2588.0 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 70.5 |================================================================= 2 . 74.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 69.2 |================================================================ 4 . 70.1 |================================================================= 5 . 72.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2149.6 |================================================================== 2 . 2193.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 2162.1 |================================================================== 4 . 2155.6 |================================================================== 5 . 2173.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 326.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 316.0 |================================================================== 3 . 322.9 |=================================================================== 4 . 324.9 |==================================================================== 5 . 325.1 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2853.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2845.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 2842.4 |=================================================================== 4 . 2837.3 |=================================================================== 5 . 2733.9 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 361.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 359.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 361.3 |==================================================================== 4 . 353.4 |================================================================== 5 . 339.6 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2834.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 2772.9 |================================================================== 3 . 2726.8 |================================================================ 4 . 2736.2 |================================================================= 5 . 2803.7 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 39.3 |================================================================ 2 . 38.7 |=============================================================== 3 . 41.3 |==================================================================== 4 . 34.5 |======================================================== 5 . 42.2 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2231.6 |================================================================== 2 . 2240.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 2188.8 |================================================================= 4 . 2181.6 |================================================================= 5 . 2253.0 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 52.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 52.70 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.69 |==================================================================== 4 . 52.23 |=================================================================== 5 . 52.38 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.28 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.21 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.21 |==================================================================== 4 . 7.29 |===================================================================== 5 . 7.21 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.62 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.61 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.61 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.62 |===================================================================== 5 . 0.60 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 53.53 |================================================================= 4 . 54.58 |================================================================== 5 . 54.53 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 55.94 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.84 |==================================================================== 3 . 55.21 |=================================================================== 4 . 55.11 |=================================================================== 5 . 54.13 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 22.48 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.51 |================================================================= 4 . 22.24 |=================================================================== 5 . 21.82 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 38.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.43 |================================================================= 3 . 36.91 |================================================================= 4 . 36.88 |================================================================ 5 . 38.86 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 120.90 |=================================================================== 2 . 116.74 |================================================================= 3 . 115.28 |================================================================ 4 . 117.08 |================================================================= 5 . 119.13 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 106600000 |============================================================== 2 . 110500000 |================================================================ 3 . 103800000 |============================================================ 4 . 97500000 |======================================================== 5 . 108100000 |=============================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 271.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 277.2 |==================================================================== 3 . 272.6 |=================================================================== 4 . 264.6 |================================================================= 5 . 277.4 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 114.8 |================================================================== 2 . 117.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 115.5 |=================================================================== 4 . 108.3 |=============================================================== 5 . 117.5 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 280.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 274.7 |================================================================== 3 . 282.9 |==================================================================== 4 . 269.3 |================================================================= 5 . 275.3 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 167.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 165.0 |================================================================== 3 . 170.1 |==================================================================== 4 . 155.0 |============================================================== 5 . 165.5 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 304.3 |================================================================== 2 . 305.5 |================================================================== 3 . 312.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 296.8 |================================================================= 5 . 311.7 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 125.8 |================================================================== 2 . 127.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 129.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 119.2 |=============================================================== 5 . 129.1 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 303.0 |================================================================== 2 . 310.2 |==================================================================== 3 . 311.4 |==================================================================== 4 . 297.9 |================================================================= 5 . 308.0 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 198.8 |================================================================== 2 . 204.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 205.9 |==================================================================== 4 . 195.5 |================================================================= 5 . 203.4 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 101.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 101.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 103.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 101.0 |================================================================== 5 . 100.1 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 62.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 62.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 64.0 |===================================================================== 4 . 62.1 |=================================================================== 5 . 61.9 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 120.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 118.6 |================================================================== 3 . 121.4 |==================================================================== 4 . 114.3 |================================================================ 5 . 118.3 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 84.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 82.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 84.8 |===================================================================== 4 . 78.8 |================================================================ 5 . 82.9 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 422.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 425.61 |=================================================================== 3 . 423.33 |=================================================================== 4 . 424.13 |=================================================================== 5 . 421.84 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 244.21 |================================================================== 2 . 246.40 |=================================================================== 3 . 243.34 |================================================================== 4 . 243.61 |================================================================== 5 . 246.36 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 455.43 |================================================================== 2 . 458.59 |================================================================== 3 . 462.04 |=================================================================== 4 . 458.19 |================================================================== 5 . 455.85 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 327.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 328.67 |=================================================================== 3 . 325.04 |================================================================== 4 . 325.79 |================================================================== 5 . 328.21 |=================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 49.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 49.37 |==================================================================== 3 . 49.41 |==================================================================== 4 . 49.28 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 47.43 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.50 |==================================================================== 3 . 46.98 |=================================================================== 4 . 47.41 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.39 |==================================================================== 2 . 56.40 |==================================================================== 3 . 56.30 |==================================================================== 4 . 56.50 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 50.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 50.93 |==================================================================== 3 . 50.89 |==================================================================== 4 . 50.75 |==================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 58.48 |================================================================== 2 . 59.12 |================================================================== 3 . 60.58 |==================================================================== 4 . 58.78 |================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 52.22 |=================================================================== 2 . 52.65 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.68 |==================================================================== 4 . 52.63 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.323 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.325 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.343 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.328 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 12.31 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.38 |==================================================================== 3 . 12.26 |=================================================================== 4 . 12.20 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.746 |=================================================================== 2 . 5.825 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.703 |=================================================================== 4 . 5.603 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 63.87 |=================================================================== 2 . 63.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 64.56 |==================================================================== 4 . 64.67 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.87 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.85 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.86 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.86 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.86 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.85 |===================================================================== 4 . 1.84 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.91 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.88 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.86 |================================================================= OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 177 |====================================================================== 2 . 175 |===================================================================== 3 . 178 |====================================================================== 4 . 172 |==================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 72 |=================================================================== 2 . 76 |======================================================================= 3 . 76 |======================================================================= 4 . 72 |=================================================================== PJSIP 2.11 Method: INVITE Responses Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2913 |================================================================= 2 . 3068 |===================================================================== 3 . 3079 |===================================================================== 4 . 2815 |=============================================================== PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateful Responses Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5542 |===================================================================== 2 . 5455 |==================================================================== 3 . 5378 |=================================================================== 4 . 5347 |=================================================================== PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateless Responses Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 31067 |============================================================== 2 . 33953 |==================================================================== 3 . 31975 |================================================================ 4 . 32542 |================================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.30 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.25 |==================================================================== 4 . 21.30 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 969.97 |================================================================== 2 . 969.86 |================================================================== 3 . 978.37 |=================================================================== 4 . 977.18 |=================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 76.42 |=================================================================== 2 . 76.78 |==================================================================== 3 . 76.55 |=================================================================== 4 . 77.24 |==================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 32.12 |==================================================================== 4 . 32.16 |==================================================================== YafaRay 3.5.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 136.32 |============================== 2 . 97.14 |===================== 3 . 99.03 |====================== 4 . 304.77 |=================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.69 |================================================= 2 . 28.68 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.10 |============================================================== 4 . 20.28 |================================================ Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 540.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 541.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 540.99 |=================================================================== 4 . 540.01 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15286754540 |============================================================== 2 . 15241314900 |============================================================== 3 . 15233730600 |============================================================== 4 . 15263723050 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13605.1 |================================================================== 2 . 13602.5 |================================================================== 3 . 13618.4 |================================================================== 4 . 13608.3 |================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 900380.0 |================================================================= 2 . 897260.3 |================================================================= 3 . 899493.7 |================================================================= 4 . 900115.1 |================================================================= KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 463150.85 |=============================================================== 2 . 471878.40 |================================================================ 3 . 437480.05 |=========================================================== 4 . 451404.09 |============================================================= GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.719 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.702 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.685 |==================================================================== 4 . 5.712 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 21570 |==================================================================== 2 . 21089 |================================================================== 3 . 21183 |=================================================================== 4 . 20629 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.046 |================================================================= 2 . 0.047 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.047 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.048 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2955 |===================================================================== 2 . 2911 |==================================================================== 3 . 2973 |===================================================================== 4 . 2930 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.338 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.343 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.336 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.341 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 756824 |=================================================================== 2 . 751731 |=================================================================== 3 . 754029 |=================================================================== 4 . 741889 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.066 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.067 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.066 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.067 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 951719 |=================================================================== 2 . 958556 |=================================================================== 3 . 955922 |=================================================================== 4 . 950667 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.105 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.104 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.105 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.105 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 747024 |================================================================== 2 . 742962 |================================================================== 3 . 745025 |================================================================== 4 . 753158 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.335 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.337 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.336 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.332 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1932 |==================================================================== 2 . 1966 |===================================================================== 3 . 1920 |=================================================================== 4 . 1956 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.44 |================================================================== 3 . 26.04 |==================================================================== 4 . 25.57 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 18862 |==================================================================== 2 . 17922 |================================================================= 3 . 18676 |=================================================================== 4 . 18260 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.053 |================================================================ 2 . 0.056 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.054 |================================================================== 4 . 0.055 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1228 |================================================================== 2 . 1280 |===================================================================== 3 . 1252 |=================================================================== 4 . 1241 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 81.46 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.12 |================================================================= 3 . 79.90 |=================================================================== 4 . 80.58 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 725 |================================================================= 2 . 708 |================================================================ 3 . 716 |================================================================ 4 . 780 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 345.05 |================================================================= 2 . 353.21 |=================================================================== 3 . 349.13 |================================================================== 4 . 320.86 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2606 |===================================================================== 2 . 2499 |================================================================== 3 . 2565 |==================================================================== 4 . 2499 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.384 |================================================================= 2 . 0.400 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.390 |================================================================== 4 . 0.400 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 628681 |=================================================================== 2 . 631134 |=================================================================== 3 . 628980 |=================================================================== 4 . 618207 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.080 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.079 |================================================================== 3 . 0.080 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.081 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 809900 |=================================================================== 2 . 799951 |================================================================== 3 . 798485 |================================================================== 4 . 800706 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.124 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.125 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.125 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.125 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 629258 |================================================================= 2 . 645578 |=================================================================== 3 . 649011 |=================================================================== 4 . 638016 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.398 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.387 |================================================================== 3 . 0.385 |================================================================== 4 . 0.392 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 53188 |==================================================================== 2 . 53289 |==================================================================== 3 . 53168 |==================================================================== 4 . 52934 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.940 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.938 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.940 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.945 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 57665 |==================================================================== 2 . 56781 |=================================================================== 3 . 56648 |=================================================================== 4 . 57246 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.735 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.762 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.766 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.747 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 53023 |==================================================================== 2 . 53030 |==================================================================== 3 . 52745 |==================================================================== 4 . 52968 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.717 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.717 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.742 |==================================================================== 4 . 4.723 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.1963 |================================================================== 2 . 5.3107 |=================================================================== 3 . 5.1143 |================================================================= 4 . 5.2445 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.2474 |================================================================== 2 . 7.2779 |=================================================================== 3 . 7.2545 |================================================================== 4 . 7.3178 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.92 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.93 |==================================================================== 4 . 14.92 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.800 |=============================================================== 2 . 2.919 |================================================================= 3 . 3.036 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.919 |================================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.079 |=========================================================== 2 . 5.121 |============================================================ 3 . 5.841 |==================================================================== 4 . 5.253 |============================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.33 |============================================================== 2 . 25.78 |============================================================= 3 . 25.68 |============================================================= 4 . 28.84 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.168 |============================================================== 2 . 7.159 |============================================================== 3 . 7.547 |================================================================= 4 . 7.865 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.939 |============================================================= 2 . 4.313 |=================================================================== 3 . 4.397 |==================================================================== 4 . 4.002 |============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.071 |================================================================== 2 . 3.149 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.076 |================================================================== 4 . 3.056 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 28.74 |=================================================================== 2 . 28.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 28.77 |=================================================================== 4 . 29.18 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 65.63 |================================================================= 2 . 43.08 |=========================================== 3 . 68.28 |==================================================================== 4 . 54.62 |====================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.05 |============================================================== 2 . 22.10 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.28 |================================================================= 4 . 20.43 |=============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.20 |================================================================= 2 . 21.12 |==================================================================== 3 . 20.95 |=================================================================== 4 . 20.41 |================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.06 |======================================================= 2 . 26.14 |==================================================================== 3 . 20.15 |==================================================== 4 . 20.23 |===================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.89 |======================================================== 2 . 22.74 |==================================================================== 3 . 19.11 |========================================================= 4 . 20.38 |============================================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.19 |================================================================= 2 . 25.50 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.30 |=================================================================== 4 . 25.05 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.25 |================================================================== 2 . 11.12 |================================================================= 3 . 10.69 |============================================================== 4 . 11.64 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.18 |==================================================================== 3 . 35.70 |================================================================= 4 . 35.67 |================================================================= NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 48.17 |========================================================= 2 . 57.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.25 |============================================================== 4 . 50.12 |============================================================ NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.04 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 20.01 |============================================================== 4 . 21.94 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.70 |================================================================= 2 . 13.82 |========================================================= 3 . 15.33 |=============================================================== 4 . 16.46 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 42.25 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 41.75 |=================================================================== 4 . 41.90 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 51.90 |========================================================= 2 . 38.78 |=========================================== 3 . 61.56 |==================================================================== 4 . 52.87 |========================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.76 |============================================================ 2 . 42.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 39.52 |=============================================================== 4 . 38.99 |============================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 69.25 |================================================================ 2 . 73.85 |==================================================================== 3 . 69.87 |================================================================ 4 . 71.35 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3946.41 |================================================================= 2 . 4029.06 |================================================================== 3 . 3969.10 |================================================================= 4 . 3903.77 |================================================================ TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 400.10 |================================================================= 2 . 401.62 |================================================================= 3 . 411.43 |=================================================================== 4 . 409.33 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 86.34 |==================================================================== 2 . 85.94 |==================================================================== 3 . 81.72 |================================================================ 4 . 84.43 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 342.63 |================================================================== 2 . 341.92 |================================================================= 3 . 334.69 |================================================================ 4 . 350.43 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 330593 |=================================================================== 2 . 291269 |=========================================================== 3 . 310827 |=============================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 211550 |======================================================== 2 . 250526 |=================================================================== 3 . 251493 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 257618 |=================================================================== 2 . 255008 |================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 274178 |=================================================================== 2 . 228873 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 181624 |=================================================================== 2 . 181180 |=================================================================== 4 . 180881 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 239114381 |=============================================================== 2 . 234607962 |============================================================== 4 . 241638865 |================================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 169135 |=================================================================== 2 . 169639 |=================================================================== 4 . 168239 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 181168 |=================================================================== 2 . 180906 |=================================================================== 4 . 180063 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 146696 |=================================================================== 2 . 146248 |=================================================================== 4 . 145823 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6539455 |=============================================================== 2 . 6635603 |================================================================ 4 . 6805057 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2377783 |================================================================== 2 . 2299668 |================================================================ 4 . 2285983 |=============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 300 |====================================================================== 2 . 300 |====================================================================== 4 . 298 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 446 |=============================================================== 2 . 467 |================================================================== 4 . 492 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 235 |================================================================== 2 . 229 |================================================================ 4 . 250 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 7153 |===================================================================== 2 . 7153 |===================================================================== 4 . 7101 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 6678 |===================================================================== 2 . 5986 |============================================================== 4 . 6134 |=============================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P1B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 45.85 |=================================================================== 2 . 46.35 |==================================================================== 4 . 45.91 |=================================================================== ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1032.64 |================================================================== 2 . 1011.91 |================================================================= 4 . 1020.66 |================================================================= ECP-CANDLE 0.4 Benchmark: P3B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1655.99 |============================================================== 2 . 1702.08 |================================================================ 4 . 1760.87 |================================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 148779.21 |=============================================================== 2 . 151078.70 |================================================================ 4 . 145098.59 |============================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 146446.94 |=============================================================== 2 . 147405.40 |================================================================ 4 . 148481.26 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 154280.64 |================================================================ 2 . 152051.20 |=============================================================== 4 . 150731.89 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 154549.19 |=============================================================== 2 . 157612.17 |================================================================ 4 . 157618.18 |================================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 158541.46 |================================================================ 2 . 158307.83 |================================================================ 4 . 158213.65 |================================================================ Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.1 |====================================================================== 2 . 1.0 |================================================================ 4 . 1.0 |================================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 87702.67 |=========================================================== 2 . 97040.46 |================================================================= 4 . 96389.12 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 132720.33 |================================================================ 2 . 132501.41 |================================================================ 4 . 109612.98 |===================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 121286.03 |================================================================ 2 . 118326.80 |============================================================== 4 . 120010.96 |=============================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 119879.31 |================================================================ 2 . 119448.71 |================================================================ 4 . 116585.11 |============================================================== BRL-CAD 7.32.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 2 . 354639 |================================================================ 4 . 337147 |============================================================= 4 . 371894 |===================================================================