AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (3801 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109061-TJ-RTX30COMP69
RTX 30 Compute September,
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp32-scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",11658.33,11572.44,11538.01
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp32-vec4",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",15361.33,15348.53,15248.07
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp16-scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",11622.79,11609.7,11538.95
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp16-vec4",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",22646.57,22431.55,22431.37
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp64-scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",364.47,363.4,363.39
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - fp64-vec4",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",365.12,363.85,363.89
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - int32-scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",11604.01,11554.64,11555.41
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - int32-vec4",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",11557.51,11499.32,11507.62
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - int16-scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",7667.11,7632.11,7633.73
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"vkpeak 20210424 - int16-vec4",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",10148.63,10085.76,10086.11
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"RealSR-NCNN 20200818 - Scale: 4x - TAA: No",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",7.857,7.858,7.852
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"RealSR-NCNN 20200818 - Scale: 4x - TAA: Yes",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",46.717,46.832,46.82
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 - Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: No",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 - Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: Yes",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",4.106,4.105,4.124
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"VkFFT 1.1.1 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",31217,31660,31784
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Hashcat 6.1.1 - Benchmark: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",39008600000,38886600000,38880300000
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Hashcat 6.1.1 - Benchmark: SHA1",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",13209700000,13183600000,13191200000
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Hashcat 6.1.1 - Benchmark: 7-Zip",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",691300,690200,687500
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Hashcat 6.1.1 - Benchmark: SHA-512",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1675100000,1673000000,1672800000
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Hashcat 6.1.1 - Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",502800,504700,502000
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Half Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Double Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"Mixbench 2020-06-23 - Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Single Precision",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",219.074,219.526,218.984
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",24.6701,24.6565,24.6747
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1135.86,1135.31,1133.3
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",25.4613,25.3905,25.3744
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",327.969,325.811,325.929
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",3749.62,3680.6,3768.38
"RTX 3090",
"GeForce RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",22984.5,23162.1,23162.1
"RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",26.333,26.2636,26.2544
"RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",27.1251,27.0901,27.1253
"RTX 3090",
"SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",2117.78,2140.33,2132.01
"RTX 3090",
"Libplacebo 2.72.2 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",297.3,295.9,297.2
"RTX 3090",
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",393.4,392.7,393.7
"RTX 3090",
"cl-mem 2017-01-13 - Benchmark: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",382.2,381.9,382
"RTX 3090",
"NAMD CUDA 2.14 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",0.126521,0.125241,0.124895
"RTX 3090",0.131554
"Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta - Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta - Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"VkResample 1.0 - Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",216.368,216.38,216.469
"RTX 3090",
"VkResample 1.0 - Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",17.503,17.54,17.544
"RTX 3090",
"OctaneBench 2020.1 - Total Score",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"RedShift Demo 3.0 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",227,226,226
"RTX 3090",
"FAHBench 2.3.2 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",265.4255,265.5845,265.5135
"RTX 3090",
"LeelaChessZero 0.28 - Backend: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",37555,38141,37673
"RTX 3090",
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenCL Particle Filter",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",5.918,5.933,5.91
"RTX 3090",
"ArrayFire 3.7 - Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",2.087,2.088,2.091
"RTX 3090",
"LuxCoreRender 2.5 - Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",6.68,6.68,6.68
"RTX 3090",
"LuxCoreRender 2.5 - Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",5.06,5.07,5.06
"RTX 3090",
"LuxCoreRender 2.5 - Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",6.99,7,6.97
"RTX 3090",
"LuxCoreRender 2.5 - Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",6.24,6.22,6.2
"RTX 3090",
"LuxCoreRender 2.5 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",21.25,21.33,21.24
"RTX 3090",
"FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",10.461,10.452,10.458
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",65.9,66.9,67.9
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",99.5,101,102
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",150,151,153
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",24.6,24.7,24.6
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",36.8,36.9,35.9
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",48.4,47.8,49.5
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",83,82.7,82.8
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",89.6,89.9,89.9
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",53.6,53,52.7
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",53.8,53.4,53.5
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",58.2,58.2,58.2
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",56.6,56.4,56.3
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",292,290,291
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",359,358,359
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",323,321,323
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",369,370,370
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",396,396,396
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",395,395,395
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",221,222,223
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",332,334,334
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",338,342,342
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",339,343,343
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"GROMACS 2021.2 - Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"Caffe 2020-02-13 - Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",4.32,4.3,4.32
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1.91,1.92,1.9
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",2.13,2.16,2.14
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1.7,1.72,1.72
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",2,2.02,2
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",3.15,3.19,3.17
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",0.97,0.98,0.98
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",5.43,5.41,5.45
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1.67,1.69,1.68
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",1.89,1.91,1.89
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",3.73,3.74,3.76
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",6.58,6.56,6.56
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",4.54,4.18,4.58
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",2.41,2.43,2.43
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",4.26,4
"RTX 3090",
"RTX 3090",
"PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"PlaidML - FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",
"RTX 3090",
"IndigoBench 4.4 - Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",12.982,12.938,12.902
"RTX 3090",
"IndigoBench 4.4 - Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",37.36,37.245,37.349
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",28.93,29,29.08
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",76.03,76.07,76.07
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",54.62,54.71,54.75
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",507.65,507.06,507.47
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",15.83,15.79,15.83
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",45.74,45.8,45.77
"RTX 3090",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX",
Lower Results Are Better
"RTX 3070",33.34,33.33,33.35
"RTX 3090",
"ViennaCL 1.7.1 - Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT",
Higher Results Are Better
"RTX 3090",