kernelparameter AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ32-AR0-00 v01000100 (F03b BIOS) and ASPEED on Rocky 8.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8: Processor: AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core @ 2.10GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ32-AR0-00 v01000100 (F03b BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 32 GB + 32 GB + 16 GB + 32 GB + 16 GB DDR4-3200MT/s, Disk: 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Rocky 8.4, Kernel: 5.13.13-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 252 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6466428.31 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 161.64 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1217758.01 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7187220.86 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1659.67 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 94450.62 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 62518.03 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2389988.92 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4423.13 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 80.34 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 198313.26 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 29970.22 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 62176056.49 |========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2673.76 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 239736.26 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 899.18 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 325.75 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 9.389 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10655 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 23.53 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10625 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11.09 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 9016 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.277 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 180977 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.265 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 188961 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3.093 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 323 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 751.26 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 333 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 283.35 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 353 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.083 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12091 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 138.40 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 361 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.082 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 231056 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.405 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 247154 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.197 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 253489 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3.002 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 333 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.070 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 14276 |================================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2248.7 |=============================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 145.54 |=============================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 71.14 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 40.09 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 22.33 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 13.07 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 72.06 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7.937 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 41.05 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 22.98 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 13.51 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 8.369 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 646474 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 684730 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 927874 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 947091 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 850348 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1102188 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1852868 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1986204 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2514040 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 637707 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 643570 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 980704 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1296094 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1570211 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1647547 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1701114 |============================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 67.6 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 33.8 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 28606 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.06 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26998 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 20361 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 20389 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6400 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3200 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1000 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 100 |================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 29.15 |================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7852.61 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7832.06 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7777.71 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7830.92 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6764.19 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11206.68 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11380.69 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11265.08 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11282.29 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11281.08 |============================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10809.7 |============================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12299.8 |============================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4839 |================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4895 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2692.27 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 24.96 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26.41 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 9636 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 8.082 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6303 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2.466 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 102791 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.657 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 152958 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4.840 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 250 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 8.259 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6171 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.967 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 128657 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.594 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 169162 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.085 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11780 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 898399 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 661237 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2245594 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 621808 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 869283 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1066669 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1842281 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1650500 |============================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26042 |================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10.81 |================================================