kernelparameter, "ctx_clock - Context Switch Time", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8", "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: System V Message Passing", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",6430811.59,6434984.5,6533488.85 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",166.6,151.97,161.53,161.03,159.13,165.07,157.97,164.57,164.9,162.73,156.67,163.2,163.97,163.63 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc C String Functions", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1212108.25,1207054.24,1234111.54 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Context Switching", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7675784.41,7583475.13,6986067.53,7078258.89,7083917.89,6974888.79,7440922.88,6701655.97,6647256.83,7100438.36,7537924.07,7297124.75,6818259.89,7152509.77,7729827.67 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Memory Copying", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1660.82,1658.52,1659.67 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Vector Math", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",94798.54,94356.32,94197.01 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Matrix Math", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",63154.8,62344.91,62054.39 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Semaphores", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",2383957.92,2396528.37,2389480.46 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Stress", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",4436.28,4456.25,4376.86 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Cache", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",79.73,80.26,81.03 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: SENDFILE", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",200206.29,197587.73,197145.77 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Forking", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",30087.61,29965.65,29857.4 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Malloc", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",62246698.95,62014823.86,62266646.67 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Crypto", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",2697.64,2667.12,2656.51 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Atomic", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",239032.1,239230.11,240946.57 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MEMFD", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",901.19,897.78,898.58 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MMAP", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",325.76,325.69,325.81 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",9.241,9.62,9.307 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",10822.819637,10396.259808,10745.080286 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",23.467,23.642,23.49 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",10654.548932,10575.374422,10643.824971 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",11.082,11.106,11.087 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",9024.270056,9004.766377,9020.382444 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.307,0.271,0.283,0.292,0.271,0.268,0.265,0.273,0.263 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",162950.871056,184471.564113,176917.26862,171103.884084,184776.874492,186744.719159,188632.64561,183037.284145,190157.272418 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.28,0.255,0.278,0.25,0.274,0.256,0.28,0.251,0.264,0.259,0.251,0.276,0.276,0.258,0.268 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",178791.258701,195825.26529,179987.735434,199786.883872,182807.81737,195085.664238,178653.308193,199432.422139,189622.867419,192928.448768,198894.536197,180929.968839,181393.730256,193692.494252,186583.543522 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",3.09,3.095,3.095 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",323.67266,323.137853,323.081194 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",750.751,756.732,746.296 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",333.038546,330.407217,335.027465 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",282.96,283.868,283.211 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",353.442689,352.313909,353.129668 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.083,0.082,0.083 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",12066.2575,12123.680662,12081.692378 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",138.422,138.398,138.378 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",361.241742,361.312619,361.366886 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1.073,1.079,1.095 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",233007.895601,231769.41732,228389.5222 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.405,0.405,0.404 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",247009.711059,246666.125235,247785.343482 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.195,0.199,0.198 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",256320.218037,251062.233238,253085.51165 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",3.002,3.001,3.003 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",333.137336,333.187146,333.034296 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.069,0.071,0.07 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",14493.931066,14007.74384,14324.938055 "OpenSSL 1.1.1 - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",2254.2,2248,2243.9 "Hackbench - Count: 32 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",144.954,146.165,145.494 "Hackbench - Count: 16 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",71.05,71.088,71.291 "Hackbench - Count: 8 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",40.122,39.964,40.185 "Hackbench - Count: 4 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",22.351,22.305,22.328 "Hackbench - Count: 2 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",13.124,13.105,12.98 "Hackbench - Count: 16 - Type: Thread", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",72.315,72.017,71.848 "Hackbench - Count: 1 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",8.008,7.918,7.886 "Hackbench - Count: 8 - Type: Thread", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",41.236,40.935,40.981 "Hackbench - Count: 4 - Type: Thread", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",23.004,22.912,23.02 "Hackbench - Count: 2 - Type: Thread", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",13.518,13.515,13.505 "Hackbench - Count: 1 - Type: Thread", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",8.457,8.265,8.385 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",649008,649628,640785 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",685098,682731,686362 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",932450,929977,921194 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",853231,922335,993875,931577,954009,888781,943820,887926,1013131,882679,1027658,978373,938305,963241,1027419 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",868997,837591,844456 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1101158,1106867,1098539 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1824364,1869815,1864426 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1981495,2024445,1952673 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",2497731,2552223,2492165 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",595631,665097,620661,610001,639104,652267,634704,656644,618762,690308,640404,630480,634005,659499,618033 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",647334,639070,644307 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",978739,985904,977469 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1295804,1296851,1295627 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1577191,1556573,1576870 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1654362,1641000,1647280 "IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1703302,1699505,1700536 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",67.6,67.6,67.6 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",33.8,33.8,33.8 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",30674,27062,30520,27022,28434,28610,29130,28258,29633,27507,27172,27048,30917,27397,29704 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1.06,1.06,1.06 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",27245,27236,26513 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",20022,20379,20681 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",20356,20206,20606 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8", "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8", "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8", "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8", "t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 1", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",29.055,28.772,33.715,28.706,28.855,28.801,28.889,28.839,28.635,28.695,28.761,28.858,28.767,28.801 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7861.87,7850.667,7845.286 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7846.091,7799.273,7850.827 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7062.602,7848.433,7843.552,7843.647,7843.138,7841.621,7843.491,7837.544,7843.214,7846.392,7842.119,7836.751 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7826.919,7836.069,7829.757 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",6771.849,6764.563,6756.158 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",10674.714,11407.627,11400.811,9629.561,11411.238,11419.878,11412.073,11118.519,11300.013,11423.2,11228.102,11414.287,11417.942,11423.464,11418.827 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",11382.541,11380.147,11379.366 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",11262.326,11269.935,11262.983 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",11278.321,11285.323,11283.229 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",11287.03,11278.606,11277.603 "Tinymembench 2018-05-28 - Standard Memset", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",10822.9,10800.7,10805.5 "Tinymembench 2018-05-28 - Standard Memcpy", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",12303.4,12287.6,12308.3 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",4901,4901,4716 "Schbench - Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",5576,4392,7800,3132,9552,3436,3804,4004,5960,5784,3284,7848,2604,4856,1394 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Socket Activity", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",3092.91,3073.62,2670.58,1687.24,3162.14,3078.04,2007.39,2838.09,2856.17,2901.24,1866.67,3073.13 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: NUMA", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",22.62,23.16,26.33,23.27,29.74,24.01,25.88,24.09,27.15,23.98,27.04,26.83,22.79,22.57,24.98 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",19.61,24.715,25.827,24.899,26.342,26.545,26.598,31.599,31.592 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",12750.183066,10116.446483,9680.789142,10041.620151,9491.58321,9418.911496,9400.258259,7912.40303,7914.310138 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",7.178,9.855,7.188,7.186,7.206,7.185,9.931,7.2,8.114,8.976,9.794,7.176 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",6966.468716,5073.901577,6956.663113,6959.012487,6939.030773,6959.153607,5035.125373,6945.289191,6162.779116,5570.603429,5105.659219,6967.881107 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1.905,2.218,2.605,2.654,2.637,2.735,2.646,2.599,2.194 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",131281.520045,112736.353651,95981.730676,94200.397854,94833.041785,91409.727936,94504.086719,96188.338713,113980.355334 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.666,0.623,0.714,0.583,0.702,0.621,0.722,0.623,0.7,0.612,0.696,0.622 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",150085.255471,160646.707094,140151.607568,171515.107315,142408.518954,161010.418473,138540.710928,160482.530334,142925.652741,163379.54686,143596.955329,160757.362679 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",3.133,3.14,8.672,3.135,8.753,3.332,6.932,3.135,3.328 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",319.165776,318.484181,115.318203,319.032594,114.245924,300.110113,144.255996,318.950576,300.469318 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",12.896,7.818,7.841,7.842,7.852,7.836,7.833,7.833,7.826,7.85,7.829,7.857 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",3877.577769,6395.785108,6377.159778,6376.389621,6368.156581,6381.314205,6383.976653,6383.858828,6389.712169,6370.33134,6387.181942,6364.729363 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1.803,1.939,1.872,1.842,2.255,1.893,2.25,1.626,2.265,2.24,1.877,1.738 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",138682.118689,128963.968844,133549.183523,135743.675723,110873.229535,132061.468827,111112.31212,153781.577252,110397.028097,111636.396053,133214.510788,143866.224259 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.594,0.642,0.641,0.554,0.643,0.584,0.578,0.642,0.601,0.565,0.551,0.53 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",168267.956578,155852.906926,156108.148418,180442.053555,155545.188955,171273.2422,173141.615136,155801.883561,166314.333159,176957.590319,181431.192623,188807.664002 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",0.099,0.086,0.084,0.08,0.085,0.09,0.085,0.079,0.08 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",10091.003919,11617.143451,11886.984589,12527.299754,11833.998785,11135.170526,11749.980372,12601.715667,12574.543968 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",819966,1015958,942308,894495,946028,637152,925171,832929,866632,902500,867251,980032,878731,962642,1004192 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",594663,889304,473612,820988,413100,546985,723101,896728,662770,684921,681603,525046,716429,504772,784538 "IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1952929,2320067,2211042,2293290,2195215,2525631,1864261,2439075,2501182,2138353,2485056,1774651,2223195,2269138,2490819 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",637836,738889,635567,642689,613409,648554,595850,591278,559430,635039,675595,600479,632400,528049,592050 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",898295,752845,741415,1099107,939421,847869,868193,707006,883450,629079,1167027,897686 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1094870,1205721,814683,995851,1201071,864351,1370133,1149520,985331,1219572,959677,1217822,937066,969628,1014741 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1718410,1863097,1967515,1675016,2267826,1713755,1612460,1914819,1743682,1885591,2039795,1705404 "IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",1451098,1393669,1878572,1729614,1896252,1974612,1533445,1709684,1393430,1602810,1723086,1656744,1269339,1581430,1963709 "iPerf 3.7 - Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64", Higher Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",24624,28587,24309,24785,23900,28748,28605,23903,27775,25112,28444,23323,28093,25685,24736 "t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 2", Lower Results Are Better "2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8",9.783,10.058,10.983,10.604,11.424,11.02,9.958,10.684,11.24,10.207,11.737,9.779,12.006,11.696,11.025