Kernel_no_Parameter AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ32-AR0-00 v01000100 (F03b BIOS) and ASPEED on Rocky 8.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8: Processor: AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core @ 2.10GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ32-AR0-00 v01000100 (F03b BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 32 GB + 32 GB + 16 GB + 32 GB + 16 GB DDR4-3200MT/s, Disk: 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Rocky 8.4, Kernel: 5.13.13-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4807 |================================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7802.9 |=============================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7363.1 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7441.88 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7359.10 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7372.38 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10319.62 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 8489.84 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4781.41 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4858.45 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4866.00 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 5039.97 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 5451.48 |============================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 29.04 |================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10.62 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 100 |================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1000 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3200 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6400 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26973 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 25473 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26623 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.05 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 29725 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26478 |================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 33.6 |================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 67.1 |================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1715707 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1646015 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1575140 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1294136 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 988188 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 656914 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1167016 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1363753 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 934924 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 911359 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 811225 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 648782 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1921235 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1712271 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1579242 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1648210 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1033590 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 862762 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 746391 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 822546 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1041540 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 934407 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 685350 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 644742 |=============================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7.327 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12.93 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 22.84 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 41.42 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6.943 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 83.19 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12.47 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 21.99 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 40.71 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 78.26 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 161.93 |=============================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2249.2 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 13989 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.072 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 333 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3.004 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 254992 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.196 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 249087 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.402 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 239359 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.045 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 361 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 138.44 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12388 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.081 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 353 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 283.08 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 336 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 744.86 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 324 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3.088 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 189613 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.264 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 12110 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.083 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 165946 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.605 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 126884 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1.988 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6379 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7.839 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 320 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 3.126 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 180616 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.277 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 8984 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 11.13 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10525 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 23.77 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 149299 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 0.673 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 96042 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2.604 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6953 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7.192 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 10403 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 9.614 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 9227 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 27.50 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 326.31 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 24.34 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 894.31 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 239382.84 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2671.74 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 61944367.76 |========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 26563.32 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 197924.25 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 81.36 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4478.23 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2379651.83 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 62577.10 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 94603.15 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 928.77 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 2785.04 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 7029930.40 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 1202740.30 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 161.12 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 6697071.57 |=========================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 252 |================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 500GB CT500P2SSD8 . 4769 |=================================================