test-single-threaded Intel Celeron J3455 testing with a PMB v1.0 (PMB-L03B-Ver-JETWAY BIOS) and Intel HD 500 APL 2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Celeron J3455: Processor: Intel Celeron J3455 @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: PMB v1.0 (PMB-L03B-Ver-JETWAY BIOS), Chipset: Intel Celeron N3350/Pentium, Memory: 1 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MT/s Unde KT8GS3EDF, Disk: 128GB SanDisk SD9SB8W1, Graphics: Intel HD 500 APL 2 3GB (750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: 1920x1080 + HL163HPW, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-27-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.3, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3286x1080 BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 4.16 |=================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 32.03 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 45.46 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 44.21 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1079.65 |================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1080.32 |================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 139.34 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 135.50 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 177.88 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 178.62 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 61.88 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 61.95 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 167.75 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 166.82 |================================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14232119.0 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1845.48 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 9742.67 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14768.66 |=============================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 166.35 |================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 70.87 |================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1336.35 |================================================ dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 125.59 |================================================= eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 94.62 |================================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 4974.7 |================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 29.28 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 129.96 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 19.27 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 6.37681 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 129.62 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 22.71 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 5.02518 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 37.68 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 15.98 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 59.61 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 49.27 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 58.58 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 6.37890 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 47.74 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 3.19394 |================================================ GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1639.1 |================================================= Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 89.54 |================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 777.64 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 329.09 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 475.82 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 613.86 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1664.79 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 804.66 |================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 23.57 |================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 68.27 |================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 483.05 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 235.25 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 72.45 |================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 444.79 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 733.07 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 929.70 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 166 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 537 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 518 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 19 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 197 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 150 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 234 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 57 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 269 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 78 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 412 |==================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 157.00 |================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 385.43 |================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 295.41 |================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 38.00 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 91.71 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 91.62 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 95.27 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 111.8 |================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1534 |=================================================== Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 12286 |================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 74.96 |================================================== Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 65.49 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 0.47208302 |============================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 0.00329939 |============================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.18 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.17 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.83 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 12.13 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13.4 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13.7 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.84 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 11.01 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 121.77 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.77 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 43.7 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 278.49 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 38.95 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 51.35 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 186.04 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 141.55 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 197.39 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 111.91 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 226.11 |================================================= R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 0.8660 |================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 2685.05 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 195.19 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56.45 |================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 45.17 |================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 213.76 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 205.85 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 454.74 |================================================= Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 41.24 |================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 279282158 |==============================================