testtest KVM testing on Kali 2021.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite. epyczen3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core (40 Cores / 80 Threads), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (?-20171121_152543-x86-ol7-builder-01.us.oracle-4.el7.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 16 GB + 16 GB + 7068 MB RAM, Disk: 1602GB BlockVolume, Graphics: bochs-drmdrmfb, Monitor: QEMU Monitor, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Kali 2021.2, Kernel: 5.10.0-kali9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 pocl 1.6 +Asserts LLVM 9.0.1 RELOC SLEEF DISTRO POCL_DEBUG + OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 20.3.5, Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110 + Clang 11.0.1-2 + LLVM 11.0.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3.790 |============================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 22 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 67 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 289 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 900 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 57 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1008 |============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 64 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 269 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 284 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 343 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 113 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 397 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 138 |=============================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 6.24 |============================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 3019.3 |============================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1557.79 |=========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 888.12 |============================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1019.71 |=========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1379.62 |=========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 3495.87 |=========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1005.65 |=========================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 15.18 |============================================================= Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 8783.3 |============================================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1700.04 |=========================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 16190.88 |========================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 31882.13 |========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 826.64 |============================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 272.37 |============================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 81.69 |============================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 693.58 |============================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 2006.10 |=========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1079.47 |=========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 346.32 |============================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 79.56 |============================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 220.23 |============================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 388.48 |============================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 377.36 |============================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 666.00 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 50.13 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 49.05 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 2964.76 |=========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 2970.63 |=========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 202.88 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 202.65 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 240.55 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 242.42 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 78.72 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 78.70 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 407.66 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 404.60 |============================================================ Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 3544 |============================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 437653875 |========================================================= Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 23373 |============================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 215.80 |============================================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 69.09 |============================================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 62.03 |============================================================= DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 79.88 |============================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 15.14 |============================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 14.20 |============================================================= Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 36.77 |============================================================= eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 54.14 |============================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 77.43 |============================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 115.84 |============================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 197.40 |============================================================ OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 103.65 |============================================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 0.22656669 |======================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 0.00172691 |======================================================== R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 0.9379 |============================================================ Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 24.92 |============================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 821 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 2686 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3979 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 5 |================================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 36 |================================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 145 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 119722 |============================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 114 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 165 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 194 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 250 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 276 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 528 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 364 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 661 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 429 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 781 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 522 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 548 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 607 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 638 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 1102 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 740 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 756 |=============================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 82.59 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 9.85223 |=========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3.45546 |=========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 81.86 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 11.09 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3.89927 |=========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 14.65 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 4.33993 |=========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 20.18 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 16.26 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 19.47 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3.45533 |=========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 23.69 |============================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 3.44742 |=========================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 12.86 |============================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 112.4 |============================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 112.0 |============================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 111.3 |============================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 114.1 |============================================================= libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 114.11 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 115.86 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 68.28 |============================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 517.91 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 1567.51 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 151.30 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 27.94 |============================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 56.69 |============================================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 36.6 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 45.2 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 25.1 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 36.9 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 21.8 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 49.3 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 21.2 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 27.4 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1301675.75 |======================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1065412.92 |======================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 792717.67 |========================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 1221413.46 |======================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 914013.71 |========================================================= Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 63.81 |============================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 1745 |============================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 194473893.46 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 53913.55 |========================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 130701.98 |========================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 141886.93 |========================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 143420.80 |========================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 143693.15 |========================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 141238.62 |========================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better epyczen3 . 355387 |============================================================ Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 88.56 |============================================================= GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 128.62 |============================================================ Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better epyczen3 . 45.13 |=============================================================