rough load AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core testing with a (1.4.1 BIOS) and NICE DCV Virtual Display on Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Build 17763 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core: Processor: AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core @ 2.55GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: (1.4.1 BIOS), Memory: 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16384 + 16128 0MHz, Disk: 1024GB ORACLE BlockVolume Disk + 1600GB ORACLE BlockVolume Disk, Graphics: NICE DCV Virtual Display, Audio: NoMachine Microphone, Monitor: DCVDspay4K, Network: Oracle VirtIO OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Build 17763, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 9.25.36.24, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 32 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 110 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 412 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 691 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 76 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 710 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 86 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 424 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 336 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 521 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 159 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 617 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 209 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1064 |================================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 4.90 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 2495.82 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1268.70 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1804.98 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 2227.30 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 5623.01 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1555.10 |============================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 9576.7 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 8172.00 |============================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 23737.67 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 47813.46 |============================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 575.99 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 128.85 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 258.29 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 567.36 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1010.00 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 915.46 |=============================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 9.553 |================================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 10.21 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 59.93 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 62.20 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 134.63 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 0.20655281 |=========================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 0.01346882 |=========================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 24.88 |================================================ Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 113.81 |=============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 1531 |================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 370541 |=============================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 73.26 |================================================ Tesseract OCR v4.0.0.20181030 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core . 134.58 |===============================================