centos79-0128-109 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.9.2009.0128.109 via the Phoronix Test Suite. centos79-0128-109: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MT/s M393B2G70DB0-YK0, Disk: 1196GB MR9271-8i + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 43.41 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1.2 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2965.20 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 17.3 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 204.55 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 17.1 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 207.09 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 42.91 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 66.87 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 185.88 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 17.3 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 204.73 |=================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 3.879 |==================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1773942 |================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 8058 |===================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 352367 |=================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.30853548 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.00309980 |=============================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1620.8 |=================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 181.79 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 11380 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.088 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1648 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.607 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 226168 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.221 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 223876 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.447 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 228759 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1.093 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 3370 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 14.84 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 9871 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.101 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2295 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 43.60 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1015 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 247.45 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1362 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.734 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 197621 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.253 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 9576 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.104 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 188180 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.532 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 184517 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1.355 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 13591 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 3.682 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1130 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.886 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 192083 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.260 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 511 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1.956 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 13629 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 7.341 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 13091 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 19.10 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 181059 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 0.552 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 178045 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1.405 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2420 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 20.67 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 276 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 3.625 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 8517 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 5.873 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2402 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 41.66 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2968 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 84.27 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 10405 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 9.632 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 11152 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 22.45 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1189 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 42.26 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1276 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 78.58 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1352 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 185.94 |=================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 153.64 |=================================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 1085554.18 |=============================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 68974 |==================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 79454 |==================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 69779 |==================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 65097 |==================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 13495.48 |================================================= Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 15988.76 |================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 21558.97 |================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 105153 |=================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 2.657 |==================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 11.47 |==================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 864548.7 |================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 892380.5 |================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better centos79-0128-109 . 899107.7 |=================================================