3700x july AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.5 |====================================================================== 2 . 2.3 |================================================================ 3 . 2.3 |================================================================ Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 177.6 |==================================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17957.6 |================================================================== 2 . 17990.4 |================================================================== 3 . 17723.6 |================================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 91786 |==================================================================== 2 . 75171 |======================================================== 3 . 75828 |======================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 92356 |==================================================================== 2 . 90717 |=================================================================== 3 . 86898 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 74099 |==================================================================== 2 . 69488 |================================================================ 3 . 70552 |================================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 68715 |================================================================= 2 . 67948 |================================================================= 3 . 71558 |==================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 825035 |=================================================================== 2 . 380131 |=============================== 3 . 768677 |============================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 48640656 |================================================================= 2 . 47744680 |================================================================ 3 . 48470896 |================================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 455717 |=================================================================== 2 . 440550 |================================================================= 3 . 451063 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1001998 |================================================================== 2 . 983610 |================================================================= 3 . 1005402 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3874 |===================================================================== 2 . 2677 |================================================ 3 . 2812 |================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1783694 |================================================================= 2 . 1802685 |================================================================== 3 . 1800848 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1533120 |================================================================= 2 . 1545099 |================================================================== 3 . 1547690 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 35149 |==================================================================== 2 . 34870 |=================================================================== 3 . 34820 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 734 |============================================================== 2 . 829 |====================================================================== 3 . 744 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 310140 |================================================================ 2 . 310953 |================================================================= 3 . 322341 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 863 |==================================================================== 2 . 882 |====================================================================== 3 . 715 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 30880 |==================================================================== 2 . 30753 |==================================================================== 3 . 30835 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 743 |====================================================================== 2 . 724 |==================================================================== 3 . 659 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 255356 |=================================================================== 2 . 252615 |================================================================== 3 . 253947 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 9101 |===================================================================== 2 . 4534 |================================== 3 . 3192 |======================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 828.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 722.3 |=========================================================== 3 . 788.6 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 711.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 702.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 705.4 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7306.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 7331.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 7357.8 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2128.4 |================================================================ 2 . 2216.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2183.5 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4687.6 |================================================================= 2 . 4806.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 4718.2 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8674.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 8606.4 |================================================================== 3 . 8356.9 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3774.0 |================================================================== 2 . 3813.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 3715.8 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2032.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 2027.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 2030.9 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3730.3 |================================================================== 2 . 3728.0 |================================================================== 3 . 3795.2 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11986.1 |================================================================= 2 . 12210.9 |================================================================== 3 . 12259.6 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1639.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 1633.6 |================================================================== 3 . 1647.5 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.028 |================================================================== 2 . 0.029 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.029 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.362 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.207 |============================================================ 3 . 1.344 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.161 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.161 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.155 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 57.95 |======================================================== 2 . 56.68 |======================================================= 3 . 69.92 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.032 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.032 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.032 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.345 |============================================================ 2 . 1.385 |============================================================== 3 . 1.528 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.196 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.198 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.197 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.494 |====================== 2 . 12.680 |=================================================== 3 . 16.503 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.826 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.833 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.817 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.727 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.717 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.658 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 27.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 27.55 |=================================================================== 3 . 27.56 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.266 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.273 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.228 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.974 |=================================================================== 2 . 4.009 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.010 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.368 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.407 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.383 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.80 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 37.70 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.87 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 18.83 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.84 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.85 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.84 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.02 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.06 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.07 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.68 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.69 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.68 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.74 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.72 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.73 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.75 |===================================================================== 3 . 7.74 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.94 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.90 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 16.60 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.46 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 66.77 |=================================================================== 2 . 66.99 |=================================================================== 3 . 67.86 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.80 |=================================================================== 2 . 17.97 |==================================================================== 3 . 17.93 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.37 |=================================================================== 2 . 14.52 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.48 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 30.37 |==================================================================== 2 . 30.34 |==================================================================== 3 . 30.19 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 28.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 28.53 |==================================================================== 3 . 28.35 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 23.58 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.42 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 11.02 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.03 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3010.56 |================================================================== 2 . 3014.30 |================================================================== 3 . 2991.02 |================================================================= TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 268.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 268.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 266.98 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 66.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.54 |==================================================================== 3 . 66.41 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 238.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 238.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 238.54 |=================================================================== YafaRay 3.5.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 143.17 |================================================================== 2 . 144.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 143.77 |===================================================================