ampere altra july Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 testing with a WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 5: Processor: Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.30GHz (160 Cores), Motherboard: WIWYNN Mt.Jade (1.1.20201019 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e100, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1LB960HAJQ-00007, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Mellanox MT28908 + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9884.0 |========================================================= 2 . 10400.7 |============================================================ 3 . 11459.2 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1335.1 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1100.0 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 12148.8 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2413.1 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1191.7 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 46200000 |================================================================= 2 . 46500000 |================================================================= 3 . 46300000 |================================================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 168.1 |================================================================= 2 . 176.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 176.1 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 60.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 61.5 |===================================================================== 3 . 61.4 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 180.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 180.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 179.8 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 89.2 |===================================================================== 2 . 89.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 88.9 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 190.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 190.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 190.2 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 64.7 |===================================================================== 2 . 64.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 64.5 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 193.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 192.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 193.3 |==================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 98.2 |===================================================================== 2 . 97.7 |===================================================================== 3 . 97.8 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.4 |===================================================================== 2 . 15.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 15.4 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.3 |====================================================================== 2 . 8.3 |====================================================================== 3 . 8.3 |====================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.9 |===================================================================== 2 . 15.9 |===================================================================== 3 . 15.9 |===================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.3 |===================================================================== 2 . 15.3 |===================================================================== 3 . 15.3 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.24 |=========================================================== 2 . 1.44 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.32 |=============================================================== 5 . 1.41 |==================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.35 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.47 |=========================================================== 3 . 6.23 |==================================================================== 5 . 5.11 |======================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.59 |================================================================ 2 . 3.67 |================================================================== 3 . 3.45 |============================================================== 5 . 3.85 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 11.54 |=================================================================== 5 . 11.60 |=================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.35 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.22 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.61 |========================================================== 5 . 16.64 |========================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 57.23 |====================================================== 2 . 67.06 |=============================================================== 3 . 72.27 |==================================================================== 5 . 60.84 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 267306 |=================================================================== 2 . 60927 |=============== 3 . 168876 |========================================== 5 . 186120 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.854 |================================= 2 . 1.748 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.039 |======================================== 5 . 0.962 |===================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 183024 |============================================================ 2 . 177869 |=========================================================== 3 . 199912 |================================================================== 5 . 203064 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.759 |================================================================= 2 . 2.880 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.542 |============================================================ 5 . 2.529 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1638 |===================================================================== 2 . 1608 |=================================================================== 3 . 1632 |==================================================================== 5 . 1646 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 61.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 62.20 |==================================================================== 3 . 61.29 |=================================================================== 5 . 60.77 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 983 |============================================================== 2 . 1088 |===================================================================== 3 . 1040 |================================================================== 5 . 1067 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 254.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 229.84 |============================================================= 3 . 240.55 |=============================================================== 5 . 234.38 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 56586 |=================================================== 2 . 75875 |==================================================================== 3 . 56426 |=================================================== 5 . 61952 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.768 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.318 |=================================================== 3 . 1.773 |==================================================================== 5 . 1.615 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 101602 |================================================== 2 . 61143 |============================== 3 . 135601 |=================================================================== 5 . 105314 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.572 |==================================================== 2 . 4.715 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.415 |================================================= 5 . 3.805 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11130 |================================================ 2 . 15832 |==================================================================== 3 . 15024 |================================================================= 5 . 12252 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.987 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.318 |================================================ 3 . 6.658 |================================================== 5 . 8.164 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 8065 |============================================================= 2 . 8007 |============================================================= 3 . 9013 |==================================================================== 5 . 9088 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.02 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.24 |==================================================================== 3 . 27.76 |============================================================ 5 . 27.52 |============================================================ TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2988.51 |================================================================== 2 . 2724.29 |============================================================ 3 . 2965.88 |================================================================== 5 . 2674.01 |=========================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 321.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 301.44 |=============================================================== 3 . 308.87 |================================================================ 5 . 299.06 |============================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 79.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 79.27 |==================================================================== 3 . 79.24 |==================================================================== 5 . 79.05 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 255.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 254.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 255.54 |=================================================================== 5 . 253.08 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102317 |=================================================================== 2 . 89024 |========================================================== 3 . 79450 |==================================================== 5 . 76856 |================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 881850287 |================================================================ 2 . 878651588 |================================================================ 3 . 865616372 |=============================================================== 5 . 879053806 |================================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 83650 |================================================================ 2 . 85897 |================================================================== 3 . 81501 |============================================================== 5 . 88714 |==================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 75182 |==================================================================== 2 . 75382 |==================================================================== 3 . 65153 |=========================================================== 5 . 63557 |========================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4612806 |=================================================== 2 . 5125113 |========================================================= 3 . 5973869 |================================================================== 5 . 5258565 |========================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 740904 |================================================================== 2 . 732841 |================================================================= 3 . 719729 |================================================================ 5 . 751640 |=================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 466.63 |================================================================== 2 . 467.91 |================================================================== 3 . 466.08 |================================================================== 5 . 471.45 |===================================================================