ssljohn AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core testing with a Dell 07PXPY (2.2.4 BIOS) and Matrox G200eW3 on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11SSL-i v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 64 GB DDR4-3200MT/s 36ASF8G72PZ-3G2E1, Disk: 2 x 1600GB SAMSUNG MZPLL1T6HAJQ-00005 + 2 x 960GB Micron_5300_MTFD + 4 x 10001GB HGST HUH721010AL, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: CentOS 7.8.2003, Kernel: 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 demhg22-lvs001: Processor: AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core @ 2.30GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 07PXPY (2.2.4 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 9599GB PERC H740P Mini + 480GB PERC H740P Mini, Graphics: Matrox G200eW3, Monitor: DELL 1907FP, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E 10GBase-T RDMA + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-17-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core . 29043 |============================== demhg22-lvs001 ......... 45575 |=============================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core . 1601333 |================================= demhg22-lvs001 ......... 2198333 |============================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core . 3867.4 |================================ demhg22-lvs001 ......... 5644.6 |============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1251 |======================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 44.60 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 7.872 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15.93 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 85.81 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 44.99 |======================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 317.13 |====================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15.78 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 36.29 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 167.06 |====================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 31.41 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 392 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 143 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 136 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 65.7 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 130 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 301 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 32.8 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 142 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 22.2 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 551 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 581 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 224 |========================================================= Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 27079.68 |==================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5952 |======================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 79.34 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3041 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.331 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 29225 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.034 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3395 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 14.73 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 827936 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.060 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2631 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 38.06 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 766336 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.131 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1876 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 134.08 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 786983 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.318 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1843 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.543 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 24769 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.040 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 24013 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2.104 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 606026 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.083 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 26469 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3.846 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 513016 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.195 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 25866 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9.817 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 476085 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.526 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1780 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.576 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 23554 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.042 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5812 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9.113 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 571256 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.088 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5549 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 20.14 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 505758 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.198 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5914 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 44.98 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 451595 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.554 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 406 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2.464 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 611 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1.638 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3103 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16.20 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8943 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5.593 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3484 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 28.73 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 10778 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9.289 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 4460 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 67.53 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 12547 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 19.95 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0498 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0921 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1175 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0445 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0548 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1168 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1517 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0445 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0529 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1099 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1450 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0445 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0513 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1081 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1405 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0445 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0519 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1072 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1400 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0449 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0647 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1121 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1422 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0452 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0735 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1150 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.1413 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 0.0481 |====================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 234373 |====================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9.597460 |==================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 51.16 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16374717 |==================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3395918 |===================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 229 |========================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 6216 |======================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8092.8 |====================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 14189.4 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8371.76 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 14985.75 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15219.22 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15438.61 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15469.96 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8781.54 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9005.12 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 9001.65 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8980.26 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 8976.72 |===================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 34.99 |======================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 11.75 |======================================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 138 |========================================================= Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3.508 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3.831 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 4.986 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5.312 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 6.545 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 7.169 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 12.53 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 13.47 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 25.17 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 26.00 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 46.76 |======================================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 17 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 25 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 13 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 42 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 58 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 59 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 19 |========================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2232543 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2083406 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2355262 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2426402 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1898220 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1527956 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2144137 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2098568 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2248366 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2144718 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1744544 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1466833 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 792749 |====================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1762426 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 858669 |====================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1094935 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1377972 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 877897 |====================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2681559 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2612534 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2315832 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2131071 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1642786 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1204836 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 31 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 7819.73 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 5284.55 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 12496.39 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 308.32 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2499238.81 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 174774.10 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 115844.56 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 22580.05 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16424335.68 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 4539950.81 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15895.20 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 14297272.69 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 418853.11 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 63.59 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 425749400.14 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 922.39 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 809.90 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1049.47 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 396909.83 |=================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 15.68 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 54.55 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 24.16 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 63.67 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 95.41 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 804433 |====================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 724419 |====================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 85178 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 102528506 |=================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 4287797 |===================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 2361200 |===================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 601455 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 17.4 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 304.77 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16.5 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 322.29 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 16.4 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 322.88 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 6.7 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 787.40 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 47.09 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 304.40 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 47.05 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 77.91 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 55649 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 52219 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 49286 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1.05 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 33.6 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 67.1 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 100 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 3200 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 6400 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 31998 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better demhg22-lvs001 . 45746 |=======================================================