xeon-platinum-8380-2p-july 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 testing with a Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 1a: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 3.40GHz (80 Cores / 160 Threads), Motherboard: Intel M50CYP2SB2U (SE5C6200.86B.0022.D08.2103221623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP + 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 8079.8 |================================================================= 1a . 7996.6 |================================================================= 2 .. 8143.2 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 193554.91 |=============================================================== 1a . 192458.17 |=============================================================== 2 .. 193461.97 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 39415.37 |================================================================ 1a . 39072.96 |=============================================================== 2 .. 38956.43 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 6416.23 |================================================================= 1a . 6416.63 |================================================================= 2 .. 6380.01 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 9080.92 |=============================================================== 1a . 8892.81 |============================================================= 2 .. 9414.94 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 91842.87 |============================================================= 1a . 93054.25 |============================================================== 2 .. 96020.70 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 3028.31 |=============================================================== 1a . 3033.83 |=============================================================== 2 .. 3105.51 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 178739.21 |=============================================================== 1a . 178061.54 |=============================================================== 2 .. 178236.32 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 116564.61 |=============================================================== 1a . 116143.58 |=============================================================== 2 .. 114520.31 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 115497.69 |=============================================================== 1a . 114200.75 |============================================================== 2 .. 113067.10 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 91318.60 |================================================================ 1a . 91614.74 |================================================================ 2 .. 91378.96 |================================================================ Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 3169.33 |================================================================ 2 .. 3221.58 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1339.1 |================================================================== 2 .. 956.2 |=============================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1551.5 |================================================================== 2 .. 1517.5 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 19149.5 |=============================================================== 2 .. 19686.2 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 3646.6 |================================================================== 2 .. 3462.5 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1034.5 |================================================================= 2 .. 1055.6 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 22021.7 |================================================================= 2 .. 21352.9 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 4662.4 |=============================================================== 2 .. 4887.9 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 7447.3 |================================================================= 2 .. 7593.1 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 18474.1 |================================================================ 2 .. 18796.4 |================================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 35448.9 |================================================================= 2 .. 34534.5 |=============================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 6885.3 |================================================================== 2 .. 6868.2 |================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 119500000 |============================================================== 2 .. 121500000 |=============================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 275.9 |=================================================================== 2 .. 277.6 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 107.2 |=========================================================== 2 .. 121.0 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 270.6 |=================================================================== 2 .. 269.6 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 172.2 |================================================================== 2 .. 174.6 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 303.1 |=================================================================== 2 .. 302.3 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 129.7 |=================================================================== 2 .. 130.3 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 298.2 |================================================================== 2 .. 305.0 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 207.4 |=================================================================== 2 .. 208.8 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 100.6 |=================================================================== 2 .. 97.0 |================================================================= srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 73.7 |==================================================================== 2 .. 72.9 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 133.9 |=================================================================== 2 .. 134.9 |=================================================================== srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 102.7 |=================================================================== 2 .. 102.7 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 7.33 |==================================================================== 2 .. 7.34 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 16.79 |=================================================================== 2 .. 16.36 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 22.97 |=================================================================== 2 .. 22.89 |=================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 64.11 |=================================================================== 2 .. 63.82 |=================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 66.65 |=================================================================== 2 .. 65.85 |================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 80.23 |================================================================== 2 .. 81.55 |=================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 72.49 |=================================================================== 2 .. 72.48 |=================================================================== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 104.11 |================================================================== 2 .. 102.28 |================================================================= Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 89.37 |=================================================================== 2 .. 87.40 |================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 2.810 |================================================================= 2 .. 2.885 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 28.91 |=================================================================== 2 .. 28.46 |================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 2.54 |================================================================= 2 .. 2.66 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 2.56 |================================================================ 2 .. 2.72 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 1.35 |==================================================================== 2 .. 1.32 |================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 20.10 |================================================================== 2 .. 20.38 |=================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 88.67 |=================================================================== 2 .. 89.27 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1a . 8.994 |=================================================================== 2 .. 8.974 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 17648 |=================================================================== 2 .. 16275 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.057 |=============================================================== 2 .. 0.061 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 417 |===================================================================== 2 .. 408 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 2.397 |================================================================= 2 .. 2.454 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 869099 |================================================================== 2 .. 823436 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.058 |================================================================ 2 .. 0.061 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 1046066 |=============================================================== 2 .. 1085021 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.096 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.092 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 1804931 |============================================================= 2 .. 1937686 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.141 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.134 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 805 |===================================================================== 2 .. 808 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 62.13 |=================================================================== 2 .. 61.89 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 13135 |=================================================================== 2 .. 13194 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.076 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.076 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 720 |===================================================================== 2 .. 709 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 138.85 |================================================================= 2 .. 141.01 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 541 |================================================================= 2 .. 570 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 462.05 |================================================================== 2 .. 438.81 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 733 |===================================================================== 2 .. 400 |====================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.364 |===================================== 2 .. 2.502 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 705895 |================================================================== 2 .. 710531 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.071 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.070 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 12348 |================================================================ 2 .. 12833 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.081 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.078 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 330327 |================================================================= 2 .. 337992 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.303 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.296 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 972060 |================================================================== 2 .. 897433 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.257 |============================================================== 2 .. 0.279 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 25184 |=================================================================== 2 .. 23935 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.986 |================================================================ 2 .. 2.089 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 620 |===================================================================== 2 .. 458 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.613 |================================================= 2 .. 2.184 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 710938 |================================================================== 2 .. 679181 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.070 |=============================================================== 2 .. 0.074 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 36071 |=================================================================== 2 .. 35911 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 2.773 |=================================================================== 2 .. 2.785 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 30334 |=================================================================== 2 .. 30555 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 8.247 |=================================================================== 2 .. 8.188 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 297729 |================================================================ 2 .. 308529 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.336 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.324 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 757645 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.33 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 18922 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 2.643 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 25576 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 3.911 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 25728 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 9.725 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 10.0344 |================================================================= 2 .. 9.9872 |================================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.999 |=============================================================== 2 .. 2.111 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 3.848 |================================================================ 2 .. 4.014 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 19.59 |=================================================================== 2 .. 19.06 |================================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 4.132 |============================================================ 2 .. 4.623 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 3.119 |=================================================================== 2 .. 2.853 |============================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.978 |=================================================================== 2 .. 1.944 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 22.41 |================================================================== 2 .. 22.69 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 4397.58 |================================================================= TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 409.73 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 75.51 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 368.00 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 99426 |=================================================================== 2 .. 99084 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 321050804 |=============================================================== 2 .. 322713994 |=============================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 1a . 93879 |=================================================================== 2 .. 93777 |===================================================================