test-single-threaded Intel Celeron J3455 testing with a PMB v1.0 (PMB-L03B-Ver-JETWAY BIOS) and Intel HD 500 on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Celeron J3455: Processor: Intel Celeron J3455 @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: PMB v1.0 (PMB-L03B-Ver-JETWAY BIOS), Chipset: Intel Celeron N3350/Pentium, Memory: 1 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MT/s Unde KT8GS3EDF, Disk: 128GB SanDisk SD9SB8W1, Graphics: Intel HD 500 (750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: HL163HPW, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.0-59-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 3062.82 |================================================ BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 131 |==================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1337.87 |================================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 76.02 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 143.18 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 278.4 |================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 2685.72 |================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 226 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 194.64 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 181.07 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 111.51 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 141.46 |================================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14461686.3 |============================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 383.54 |================================================= Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 4960.8 |================================================= Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 124854647.29 |=========================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1583 |=================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56.6 |=================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 297.64 |================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 878.64 |================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 8412.13 |================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 53.84 |================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 167.94 |================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 166.24 |================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 159.42 |================================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 183 |==================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 153.02 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 43.67 |================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 29.76 |================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1637.9 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 38.96 |================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 94.36 |================================================== dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 125.53 |================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1847.17 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14753.89 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 9756.82 |================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.87 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 0.47009205 |============================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.2 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.78 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13 |===================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 88.84 |================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 228043 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 517 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 14 |===================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 3235 |=================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 70.57 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 58.8 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 196 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 19 |===================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 60.81 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 0.00311787 |============================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 49.8 |=================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 44.3 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13.28 |================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 28.77 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 13.71 |================================================== Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 12257 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 12.12 |================================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 41.12 |================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 776.98 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 10.69 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.68 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 31.5 |=================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 418620.66 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 269 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56 |===================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1080.34 |================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1080.36 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 234 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 149 |==================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 19.20 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 179.12 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 177.90 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 134.65 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 138.72 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 166.81 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 167.86 |================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 62.01 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 62.04 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 44.24 |================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 45.60 |================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 29.98 |================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 545466.98 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 412 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 78 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 538 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 165 |==================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 476.61 |================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 620517.25 |============================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 68.33 |================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 23.58 |================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 762639.77 |============================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 775661.48 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 190.74 |================================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.17 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 21.16 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 129.93 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 129.55 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 47.39 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 58.59 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 49.29 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 59.63 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 6.37124 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 22.72 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 15.99 |================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 5.02027 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 6.37181 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 3.19117 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 37.66 |================================================== Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 35.03 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 109.1 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 94.98 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 91.46 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 91.60 |================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 38.07 |================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 4.16 |=================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 450.26 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 188.16 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 213.50 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 45.31 |================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 56.47 |================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 924.02 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 737.00 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 413.90 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 72.95 |================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 235.16 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 804.32 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 1665.42 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 612.20 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 473.77 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Celeron J3455 . 329.19 |=================================================