redhat144
4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6254 testing with a HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10 (U34 BIOS) and llvmpipe on RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 (I31 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10

	OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1000

redhat146: 

	Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 Plus v2 (A42 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2016GB, Disk: 7681GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 4 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb

	OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

redhat145: 

	Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6254 (72 Cores / 144 Threads), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10 (U34 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 2268GB, Disk: 7681GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb

	OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75.69 |================
redhat146 ............................................. 39.51 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 56.02 |============


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8114  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 60447 |================


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 506 |==================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18866.84 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 22839.89 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17793.95 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 18693.60 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19068.62 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 20126.53 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18429.17 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 20870.64 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17780.60 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 22774.43 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17622.60 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 18629.99 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15039.58 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 19230.68 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17134.10 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 20853.25 |=============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 58073.0  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 229524.4 |=============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50368.7  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 209246.7 |=============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57018.9  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 222768.7 |=============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57297.0  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 219004.3 |=============


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1445.94 |======
redhat145 ............................................. 3631.00 |==============


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3071.32 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 5395.95 |==============


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.40819  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 40.05220 |=============


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 438.85  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 1679.85 |==============


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 147.56 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 40.50  |====


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.984681 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 1.086739 |=====


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI-Q
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.887932 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 6.921178  |======


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP Stencil
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.943678 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 4.906981  |=====


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 241.79 |=====
redhat145 ............................................. 763.80 |===============


CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 96.14 |================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 504.83 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 119.33 |====


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 327.39 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 112.96 |=====


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.70 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 53.53  |======


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.010 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 9.868  |======


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.22 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 12.99 |=========


NAMD 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.14900 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 0.27694 |===


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.34 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 16.48 |====


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 39.392060 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 6.038240  |==


Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7
Primate Phylogeny Analysis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 458.71 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 293.60 |==========


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11273 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 6207  |=========


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9519 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 4197 |=======


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18542 |================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18630 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 7375  |======


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4562.85 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 1632.36 |=====


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5758.73 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 2213.77 |=====


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5925.00 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 3024.50 |=======


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1116.62 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 388.98  |=====


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 85255.02 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 26865.93 |====


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8444.97 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 4731.87 |========


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Twitter HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18489.67 |=============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 49998.60 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 7519.30  |==


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 122962.33 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 18874.32  |==


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4655.63 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 2011.89 |======


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205.6 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 336.7 |================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1424.1 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 2346.6 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.5 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 46.0 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1617.2 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 2335.1 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.25 |============
redhat145 ............................................. 3.08 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1267.3 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 1902.6 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 141.3 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 234.3 |================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1551.8 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 2501.0 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.2 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 83.6 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1556.8 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 2474.9 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.20 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 2.95 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1259.1 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 2024.2 |===============


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17279  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 113229 |===============


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95737   |
redhat145 ............................................. 6681667 |==============


Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 47.06 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 15.62 |=====


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 396  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 1509 |=================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 289 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 477 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 385 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 1169 |=================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 488  |=====
redhat145 ............................................. 1616 |=================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 195 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 503 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 450 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 728 |==================


oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.80103 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 2.91600 |=====


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.00 |==
redhat145 ............................................. 90.91 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.40  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 16.67 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.79 |====
redhat145 ............................................. 8.17 |=================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.54  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 125.00 |===============


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.96 |====
redhat145 ............................................. 9.01 |=================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |==
redhat145 ............................................. 83.33 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.27  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 25.00 |================


TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 426.38 |======
redhat145 ............................................. 985.86 |===============


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.79 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.13 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20.21 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.07 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 21.10 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17.87 |================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.19 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.20 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.17 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.27 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.40 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.89 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.60 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.117 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.276 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.398 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 9
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.514 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.071 |================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.65 |=================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |=================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.25 |================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.09 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.30 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.20 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.13 |=================


x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.69 |=================


x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.94 |=================


ACES DGEMM 1.0
Sustained Floating-Point Rate
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.333266 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 9.735583 |=============


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |====
redhat145 ............................................. 1.08 |=================


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |====
redhat145 ............................................. 1.04 |=================


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.14 |=====
redhat145 ............................................. 0.49 |=================


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmark
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 154 |==================


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17528622 |=============


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 48517232 |=============


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 756790 |===============


Coremark 1.0
CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 457582.56  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 1627323.08 |===========


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1992.55 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 3496.40 |==============


7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33797  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 326777 |===============


asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51109396  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 179777486 |============


Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443310043 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 610582120 |============


ebizzy 0.3

Records/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 535079 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 942422 |===============


Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 63.14 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 23.95 |======


Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 84.02 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 31.81 |======


Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2171.71 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 889.02  |======


Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34.82 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 16.56 |========


Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 73.71 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 28.86 |======


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.53 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 10.19 |===


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.813 |================


POV-Ray 3.7.0.7
Trace Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 35.33 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 10.66 |=====


Rust Mandelbrot
Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 54.79 |================


Rust Prime Benchmark
Prime Number Test To 200,000,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.51 |================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.146  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 77.204 |===============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.06632 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.23958 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.29099 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.69676 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.53 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.58689 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.29 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 40.17 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.36326 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.15348 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5089.36 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3133.97 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5005.57 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3187.61 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.54271 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5460.60 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3674.58 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.44006 |==============


Numpy Benchmark

Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.71 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 257.43 |===============


AOBench
Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 77.16 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 51.08 |===========


Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 162.55 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 78.25  |=======


Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 415.48 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 187.47 |=======


Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 125.07 |===============


XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.36 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 25.13 |================


DeepSpeech 0.6
Acceleration: CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 279.26 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 166.49 |=========


FFmpeg 4.0.2
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |================


Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.00 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 16.55  |==


m-queens 1.2
Time To Solve
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 42.82 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 12.63 |=====


Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.32327043 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 0.13318874 |=====


Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.00427957 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 0.00212461 |=====


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1488.27 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 810.92  |========


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 446.07 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 248.61 |========


OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3025.9  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 19903.9 |==============


Aircrack-ng 1.5.2

k/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33358.92  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 239865.68 |============


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61361.5 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 42089.9 |==========


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61157.0 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 41942.9 |==========


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.62480 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 1.88184 |=====


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.87248 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 1.89392 |=======


Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark

runs/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.18 |=================


Apache CouchDB 3.1.1
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 317.25 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 119.71 |======


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2153.73 |========
redhat145 ............................................. 3732.91 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3164.51  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 10760.50 |=============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3969.19  |=====
redhat145 ............................................. 11446.50 |=============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3872.51  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 12236.70 |=============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1620.47 |======
redhat145 ............................................. 3878.24 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2363.26 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 4900.79 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 216.02 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 45.60  |===


libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0
Test: Decompression Throughput
Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.83 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 174.05 |===============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18957011 |======
redhat145 ............................................. 42906278 |=============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1313.34 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 877.91  |=========


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 856.65 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 904.20 |===============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1775.93 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 1561.41 |============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1260.63 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 761.17  |========


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443.01 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 511.37 |===============


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 1
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2063 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 3582 |=================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 4
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1149 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 1699 |=================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 8
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 864  |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 1466 |=================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 16
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 465  |======
redhat145 ............................................. 1292 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9140  |=====
redhat145 ............................................. 31040 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.110 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 0.032 |=====


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 809  |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 1525 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.242 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 0.657 |========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 335194 |======
redhat145 ............................................. 782029 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.303 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 0.128 |=======


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 309801 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 626618 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.819 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 0.400 |========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 283  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 1463 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 178.85 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 34.22  |===


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 361 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 867 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.783 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 3.687 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 153  |==
redhat145 ............................................. 1481 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 664.97 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 67.64  |==


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 71   |=
redhat145 ............................................. 1406 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3593.25 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 178.36  |=


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 155 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 209 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 6.828 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 5.056 |============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1074 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 440  |=======


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 99.79  |============
redhat145 ............................................. 122.88 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 925 |==================
redhat145 ............................................. 252 |=====


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.907 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 5.160 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 348 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 449 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 301.79 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 242.88 |============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 320 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 382 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 806.29 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 663.94 |============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 422 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 441 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 134.60 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 121.92 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 114 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 203 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.626 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 5.783 |==========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 473 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 627 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.25 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 92.79  |==========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 55 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 62 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.09 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 16.18 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 243 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 511 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 424.54 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 327.28 |============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 206 |==========
redhat145 ............................................. 377 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1240.70 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 710.35  |========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 510 |==================
redhat145 ............................................. 460 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 226.66 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 231.62 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 819   |=
redhat145 ............................................. 10107 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 485.23 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 784.72 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 565 |==================
redhat145 ............................................. 309 |==========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.65 |=========
redhat145 ............................................. 173.73 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 57 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19.72 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 17.69 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 899  |============
redhat145 ............................................. 1278 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 56.68 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 39.17 |===========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 413 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 521 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 306.31 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 201.90 |==========


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 408 |==================
redhat145 ............................................. 310 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 642.85 |===========
redhat145 ............................................. 856.17 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 606  |========
redhat145 ............................................. 1328 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 170.30 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 75.62  |=======


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12   |
redhat145 ............................................. 1092 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22058.92 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 231.00   |


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 794  |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 1054 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.11 |================
redhat145 ............................................. 47.47 |============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 523  |========
redhat145 ............................................. 1125 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 197.52 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 90.04  |=======


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12   |
redhat145 ............................................. 1101 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20879.39 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 227.91   |


SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 177.18 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 87.65  |=======


Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2599.44  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 11625.38 |=============


Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8127.87  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 28484.98 |=============


ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1361 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 651  |========


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8480.47 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 7167.20 |============


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: RAM / Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8612.50 |==============
redhat145 ............................................. 7057.74 |===========


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34170.69  |===
redhat145 ............................................. 159795.13 |============


Xsbench 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4097532 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 8743155 |==============


PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2701 |=================
redhat145 ............................................. 1433 |=========


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: EXPoSE
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2407.85 |==============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Time To Completion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2357.04 |==============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Relative Entropy
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50.36 |================


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Windowed Gaussian
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.52 |================


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Earthgecko Skyline
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 169.76 |===============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Bayesian Changepoint
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 109.38 |===============


NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10322.59 |=============
redhat145 ............................................. 3071.30  |====


NeatBench 5
Acceleration: All
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.71  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 35.90 |================


NeatBench 5
Acceleration: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.67  |====
redhat145 ............................................. 36.00 |================


PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 103322 |=======
redhat145 ............................................. 213085 |===============


Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 120.14 |===============
redhat145 ............................................. 75.59  |=========