redhat144 4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6254 testing with a HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10 (U34 BIOS) and llvmpipe on RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9 via the Phoronix Test Suite. LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 (I31 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1000 redhat146: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 Plus v2 (A42 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2016GB, Disk: 7681GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 4 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 redhat145: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6254 (72 Cores / 144 Threads), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10 (U34 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 2268GB, Disk: 7681GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75.69 |================ redhat146 ............................................. 39.51 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 56.02 |============ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8114 |== redhat145 ............................................. 60447 |================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 506 |================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18866.84 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 22839.89 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17793.95 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 18693.60 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19068.62 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 20126.53 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18429.17 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 20870.64 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17780.60 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 22774.43 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17622.60 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 18629.99 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15039.58 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 19230.68 |============= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17134.10 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 20853.25 |============= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 58073.0 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 229524.4 |============= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50368.7 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 209246.7 |============= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57018.9 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 222768.7 |============= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57297.0 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 219004.3 |============= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1445.94 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 3631.00 |============== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3071.32 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 5395.95 |============== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.40819 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 40.05220 |============= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 438.85 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 1679.85 |============== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 147.56 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 40.50 |==== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.984681 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 1.086739 |===== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI-Q Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.887932 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 6.921178 |====== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.943678 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 4.906981 |===== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 241.79 |===== redhat145 ............................................. 763.80 |=============== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 96.14 |================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 504.83 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 119.33 |==== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 327.39 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 112.96 |===== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.70 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 53.53 |====== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.010 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 9.868 |====== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.22 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 12.99 |========= NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.14900 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 0.27694 |=== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.34 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 16.48 |==== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 39.392060 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 6.038240 |== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 458.71 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 293.60 |========== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11273 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 6207 |========= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9519 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 4197 |======= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18542 |================ DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18630 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 7375 |====== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4562.85 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 1632.36 |===== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5758.73 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 2213.77 |===== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5925.00 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 3024.50 |======= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1116.62 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 388.98 |===== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 85255.02 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 26865.93 |==== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8444.97 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 4731.87 |======== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18489.67 |============= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 49998.60 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 7519.30 |== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 122962.33 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 18874.32 |== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4655.63 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 2011.89 |====== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205.6 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 336.7 |================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1424.1 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 2346.6 |=============== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.5 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 46.0 |================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1617.2 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 2335.1 |=============== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.25 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 3.08 |================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1267.3 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 1902.6 |=============== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 141.3 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 234.3 |================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1551.8 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 2501.0 |=============== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.2 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 83.6 |================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1556.8 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 2474.9 |=============== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.20 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 2.95 |================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1259.1 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 2024.2 |=============== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17279 |== redhat145 ............................................. 113229 |=============== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95737 | redhat145 ............................................. 6681667 |============== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 47.06 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 15.62 |===== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 396 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 1509 |================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 289 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 477 |================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 385 |================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 1169 |================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 488 |===== redhat145 ............................................. 1616 |================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 195 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 503 |================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 450 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 728 |================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.80103 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 2.91600 |===== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.00 |== redhat145 ............................................. 90.91 |================ OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.40 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 16.67 |================ OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.79 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 8.17 |================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.54 |== redhat145 ............................................. 125.00 |=============== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.96 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 9.01 |================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |== redhat145 ............................................. 83.33 |================ OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.27 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 25.00 |================ TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 426.38 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 985.86 |=============== Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.79 |================ Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.13 |================ Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20.21 |================ Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.07 |================ Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 21.10 |================ Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17.87 |================ Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.19 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.20 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.17 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.27 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.40 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.89 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.60 |================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.117 |================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.276 |================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.398 |================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 9 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.514 |================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.071 |================ SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.65 |================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.25 |================ VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.09 |================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.30 |================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.20 |================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.13 |================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.69 |================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.94 |================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.333266 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 9.735583 |============= Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 1.08 |================= Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 1.04 |================= Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.14 |===== redhat145 ............................................. 0.49 |================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 154 |================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17528622 |============= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 48517232 |============= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 756790 |=============== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 457582.56 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 1627323.08 |=========== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1992.55 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 3496.40 |============== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33797 |== redhat145 ............................................. 326777 |=============== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51109396 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 179777486 |============ Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443310043 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 610582120 |============ ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 535079 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 942422 |=============== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 63.14 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 23.95 |====== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 84.02 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 31.81 |====== Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2171.71 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 889.02 |====== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34.82 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 16.56 |======== Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 73.71 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 28.86 |====== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.53 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 10.19 |=== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.813 |================ POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 35.33 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 10.66 |===== Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 54.79 |================ Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.51 |================ Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.146 |== redhat145 ............................................. 77.204 |=============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.06632 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.23958 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.29099 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.69676 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.53 |================ oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.58689 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.29 |================ oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 40.17 |================ oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.36326 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.15348 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5089.36 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3133.97 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5005.57 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3187.61 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.54271 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5460.60 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3674.58 |============== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.44006 |============== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.71 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 257.43 |=============== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 77.16 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 51.08 |=========== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 162.55 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 78.25 |======= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 415.48 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 187.47 |======= Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 125.07 |=============== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.36 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 25.13 |================ DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 279.26 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 166.49 |========= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.00 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 16.55 |== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 42.82 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 12.63 |===== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.32327043 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 0.13318874 |===== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.00427957 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 0.00212461 |===== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1488.27 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 810.92 |======== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 446.07 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 248.61 |======== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3025.9 |== redhat145 ............................................. 19903.9 |============== Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33358.92 |== redhat145 ............................................. 239865.68 |============ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61361.5 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 42089.9 |========== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61157.0 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 41942.9 |========== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.62480 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 1.88184 |===== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.87248 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 1.89392 |======= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.18 |================= Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 317.25 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 119.71 |====== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2153.73 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 3732.91 |============== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3164.51 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 10760.50 |============= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3969.19 |===== redhat145 ............................................. 11446.50 |============= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3872.51 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 12236.70 |============= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1620.47 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 3878.24 |============== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2363.26 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 4900.79 |============== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 216.02 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 45.60 |=== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.83 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 174.05 |=============== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18957011 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 42906278 |============= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1313.34 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 877.91 |========= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 856.65 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 904.20 |=============== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1775.93 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 1561.41 |============ Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1260.63 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 761.17 |======== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443.01 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 511.37 |=============== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2063 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 3582 |================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 4 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1149 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 1699 |================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 864 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 1466 |================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 465 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 1292 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9140 |===== redhat145 ............................................. 31040 |================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.110 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 0.032 |===== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 809 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 1525 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.242 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 0.657 |======== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 335194 |====== redhat145 ............................................. 782029 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.303 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 0.128 |======= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 309801 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 626618 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.819 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 0.400 |======== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 283 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 1463 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 178.85 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 34.22 |=== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 361 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 867 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.783 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 3.687 |================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 153 |== redhat145 ............................................. 1481 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 664.97 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 67.64 |== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 71 |= redhat145 ............................................. 1406 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3593.25 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 178.36 |= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 155 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 209 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 6.828 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 5.056 |============ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1074 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 440 |======= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 99.79 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 122.88 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 925 |================== redhat145 ............................................. 252 |===== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.907 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 5.160 |============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 348 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 449 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 301.79 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 242.88 |============ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 320 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 382 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 806.29 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 663.94 |============ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 422 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 441 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 134.60 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 121.92 |============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 114 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 203 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.626 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 5.783 |========== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 473 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 627 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.25 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 92.79 |========== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 55 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 62 |=================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.09 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 16.18 |============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 243 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 511 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 424.54 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 327.28 |============ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 206 |========== redhat145 ............................................. 377 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1240.70 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 710.35 |======== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 510 |================== redhat145 ............................................. 460 |================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 226.66 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 231.62 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 819 |= redhat145 ............................................. 10107 |================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 485.23 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 784.72 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 565 |================== redhat145 ............................................. 309 |========== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.65 |========= redhat145 ............................................. 173.73 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 57 |=================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19.72 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 17.69 |============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 899 |============ redhat145 ............................................. 1278 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 56.68 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 39.17 |=========== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 413 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 521 |================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 306.31 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 201.90 |========== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 408 |================== redhat145 ............................................. 310 |============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 642.85 |=========== redhat145 ............................................. 856.17 |=============== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 606 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 1328 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 170.30 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 75.62 |======= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12 | redhat145 ............................................. 1092 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22058.92 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 231.00 | PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 794 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 1054 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.11 |================ redhat145 ............................................. 47.47 |============ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 523 |======== redhat145 ............................................. 1125 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 197.52 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 90.04 |======= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12 | redhat145 ............................................. 1101 |================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20879.39 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 227.91 | SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 177.18 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 87.65 |======= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2599.44 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 11625.38 |============= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8127.87 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 28484.98 |============= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1361 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 651 |======== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8480.47 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 7167.20 |============ Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8612.50 |============== redhat145 ............................................. 7057.74 |=========== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34170.69 |=== redhat145 ............................................. 159795.13 |============ Xsbench 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4097532 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 8743155 |============== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2701 |================= redhat145 ............................................. 1433 |========= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2407.85 |============== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Time To Completion Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2357.04 |============== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50.36 |================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.52 |================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 169.76 |=============== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 109.38 |=============== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10322.59 |============= redhat145 ............................................. 3071.30 |==== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: All FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.71 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 35.90 |================ NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.67 |==== redhat145 ............................................. 36.00 |================ PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 103322 |======= redhat145 ............................................. 213085 |=============== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 120.14 |=============== redhat145 ............................................. 75.59 |=========