clpeak1 AMD FX-6300 Six-Core testing with a MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) v4.0 (V22.4 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X on openSUSE 20210708 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X: Processor: AMD FX-6300 Six-Core @ 3.50GHz (3 Cores / 6 Threads), Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) v4.0 (V22.4 BIOS), Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZEX-08W + 275GB Crucial CT275MX3 + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DX002-2DV1 + 64GB Cruzer Blade, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: BenQ GW2270, Network: Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 OS: openSUSE 20210708, Kernel: 5.13.0-1-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.22.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.11, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2841.17), Compiler: GCC 11.1.1 20210625 [revision 62bbb113ae68a7e724255e17143520735bcb9ec9] + Clang 12.0.0Target: + LLVM 12.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 clpeak OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency us < Lower Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 77.38 |====================================== clpeak OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT GIOPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 244.14 |===================================== clpeak OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 1003.74 |==================================== clpeak OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 77.07 |====================================== clpeak OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 62.76 |====================================== clpeak OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 3.75 |======================================= clpeak OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better Radeon R7 250X + Radeon R7 260X . 5.82 |=======================================