serversuite 4 x Intel Xeon E5-4650 0 testing with a Dell 04K5X5 (2.7.0 BIOS) and llvmpipe on CentOS Linux 8 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5-4650 0 @ 3.30GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 04K5X5 (2.7.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: Smart Cable, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe + 2 x Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ OS: CentOS Linux 8, Kernel: 4.18.0-305.3.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.4.1 20200928, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 134.18 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7.5 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 955.52 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8.5 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 829.04 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8.5 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 829.90 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 135.25 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 168.68 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 779.43 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8.6 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 817.62 |=============================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3.489 |================================================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1111437 |============================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3336 |================================================= simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1.01 |================================================= simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.35 |================================================= simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.93 |================================================= simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.98 |================================================= Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3175 |================================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 669276 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.22327205 |=========================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.00183690 |=========================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3508.3 |=============================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 5.39 |================================================= Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 140.60 |=============================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7389 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 4 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 5338 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 4458 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3793 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1827 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 780 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 347 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 285 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 287 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 14510 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.069 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1957 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.511 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 371537 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.135 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 463503 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.216 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 444574 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.563 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3148 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 15.89 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 12046 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.083 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 2418 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 41.39 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1801 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 139.26 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1674 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.598 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 298268 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.168 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 11334 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.088 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 338532 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.296 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 315324 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.794 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 12101 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 4.336 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1560 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.641 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 285192 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.175 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 488 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 2.049 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 12097 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8.797 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 10395 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 25.14 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 333958 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.300 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 281932 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 0.888 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3200 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 17.96 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 379 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 2.639 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7221 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 6.939 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3347 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 33.44 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3859 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 76.79 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8777 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 11.43 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 10280 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24.46 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3153 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 15.89 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3111 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 32.26 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 3300 |================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 76.28 |================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 115.62 |=============================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1480992.51 |=========================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1109684.20 |=========================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 949339.85 |============================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 745894.98 |============================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 1064760.15 |=========================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 875124.90 |============================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 48662 |================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 128709 |=============================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 6927 |================================================= Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 2551 |================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8064.7 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8137.9 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24970.5 |============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24876.5 |============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8074.6 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7997.5 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 8151.1 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7981.4 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7979.1 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24907.7 |============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24943.3 |============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 24983.5 |============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7970.5 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7973.8 |=============================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1797GB PERC H710P . 7969.2 |===============================================