redhat144
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 testing with a HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 (I31 BIOS) and llvmpipe on RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 (I31 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10

	OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 7.9, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.4 (LLVM 7.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1000


SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75.69 |================


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8114 |=================


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 75 |===================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18866.84 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17793.95 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19068.62 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18429.17 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17780.60 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17622.60 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15039.58 |=============


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17134.10 |=============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 58073.0 |==============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50368.7 |==============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57018.9 |==============


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 57297.0 |==============


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1445.94 |==============


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3071.32 |==============


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.40819 |==============


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 438.85 |===============


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 147.56 |===============


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.984681 |=============


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI-Q
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.89 |================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP Stencil
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.94 |================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 241.79 |===============


CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 96.14 |================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 504.83 |===============


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 327.39 |===============


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.70 |===============


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.01 |================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.22 |================


NAMD 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.14900 |==============


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.34 |================


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 39.39 |================


Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7
Primate Phylogeny Analysis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 458.71 |===============


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11273 |================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9519 |=================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18542 |================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18630 |================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4562.85 |==============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5758.73 |==============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5925.00 |==============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1116.62 |==============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 85255.02 |=============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8444.97 |==============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Twitter HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18489.67 |=============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 49998.60 |=============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 122962.33 |============


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4655.63 |==============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205.6 |================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1424.1 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22.5 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1617.2 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.25 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1267.3 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 141.3 |================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1551.8 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.2 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1556.8 |===============


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.20 |=================


Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1259.1 |===============


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17279 |================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95737 |================


Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 47.06 |================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 396 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 289 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 95 |===================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 205 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 488 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 195 |==================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 450 |==================


oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.80103 |==============


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.00 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.40 |=================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.79 |=================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.54 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.96 |=================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |================


OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.27 |=================


TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 426.38 |===============


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.79 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 15.13 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20.21 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.07 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 21.10 |================


Embree 3.13
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17.87 |================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.19 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.20 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.17 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.27 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.40 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.89 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |=================


Kvazaar 2.0
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.60 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.117 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.276 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.398 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 9
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.514 |================


rav1e 0.4
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.071 |================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.65 |=================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.38 |=================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.25 |================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.09 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.30 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4.20 |=================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0
Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.13 |=================


x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.69 |=================


x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.94 |=================


ACES DGEMM 1.0
Sustained Floating-Point Rate
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.333266 |=============


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |=================


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.27 |=================


Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0
Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.14 |=================


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmark
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 154 |==================


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 17528622 |=============


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 48517232 |=============


OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 756790 |===============


Coremark 1.0
CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 457582.56 |============


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1992.55 |==============


7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33797 |================


asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51109396 |=============


Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443310043 |============


ebizzy 0.3

Records/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 535079 |===============


Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 63.14 |================


Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 84.02 |================


Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2171.71 |==============


Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34.82 |================


Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 73.71 |================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 52.53 |================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.813 |================


POV-Ray 3.7.0.7
Trace Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 35.33 |================


Rust Mandelbrot
Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 54.79 |================


Rust Prime Benchmark
Prime Number Test To 200,000,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 11.51 |================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.146 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.06632 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 7.23958 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.29099 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.69676 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 14.53 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.58689 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10.29 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 40.17 |================


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.36326 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.15348 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5089.36 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3133.97 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5005.57 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3187.61 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.54271 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5460.60 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3674.58 |==============


oneDNN 2.1.2
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.44006 |==============


Numpy Benchmark

Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 139.71 |===============


AOBench
Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 77.16 |================


Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 162.55 |===============


Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 415.48 |===============


Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 125.07 |===============


XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 24.36 |================


DeepSpeech 0.6
Acceleration: CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 279.26 |===============


FFmpeg 4.0.2
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12.05 |================


Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.00 |===============


m-queens 1.2
Time To Solve
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 42.82 |================


Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.32327043 |===========


Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.00427957 |===========


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1488.27 |==============


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 446.07 |===============


OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3025.9 |===============


Aircrack-ng 1.5.2

k/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 33358.92 |=============


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61361.5 |==============


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 61157.0 |==============


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.62480 |==============


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.87248 |==============


Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark

runs/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2.18 |=================


Apache CouchDB 3.1.1
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 317.25 |===============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2153.73 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3164.51 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3969.19 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3872.51 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1620.47 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2363.26 |==============


ASKAP 1.0
Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 216.02 |===============


libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0
Test: Decompression Throughput
Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.83 |===============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18957011 |=============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1313.34 |==============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 856.65 |===============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1775.93 |==============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1260.63 |==============


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 443.01 |===============


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 1
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2063 |=================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 4
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1149 |=================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 8
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 864 |==================


MariaDB 10.5.2
Clients: 16
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 465 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9140 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.110 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 809 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1.242 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 335194 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.303 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 309801 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 0.819 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 283 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 178.85 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 361 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3.783 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 153 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 664.97 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 71 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 3593.25 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 155 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 6.828 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1074 |=================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 99.79 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 925 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 5.907 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 348 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 301.79 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 320 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 806.29 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 422 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 134.60 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 114 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 9.626 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 473 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 137.25 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 55 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.09 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 243 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 424.54 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 206 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1240.70 |==============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 510 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 226.66 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 819 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 485.23 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 565 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 102.65 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 51 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 19.72 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 899 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 56.68 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 413 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 306.31 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 408 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 642.85 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 606 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 170.30 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 22058.92 |=============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 794 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 64.11 |================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 523 |==================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 197.52 |===============


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 12 |===================


PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 20879.39 |=============


SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 177.18 |===============


Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2599.44 |==============


Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8127.87 |==============


ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 1361 |=================


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8480.47 |==============


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: RAM / Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8612.50 |==============


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 34170.69 |=============


Xsbench 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 4097532 |==============


PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2701 |=================


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: EXPoSE
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2407.85 |==============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Time To Completion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 2357.04 |==============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Relative Entropy
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 50.36 |================


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Windowed Gaussian
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 18.52 |================


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Earthgecko Skyline
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 169.76 |===============


Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Bayesian Changepoint
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 109.38 |===============


NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 10322.59 |=============


NeatBench 5
Acceleration: All
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.71 |=================


NeatBench 5
Acceleration: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 8.67 |=================


PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 103322 |===============


Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
LOGICAL VOLUME - llvmpipe - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 . 120.14 |===============