test-results-r740-4

Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a Dell 0JMK61 (2.6.4 BIOS) and Matrox G200eW3 on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2106017-AGEN-TESTRES24
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
test-results-r740--4
May 31 2021
  4 Hours, 4 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

test-results-r740-4 Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a Dell 0JMK61 (2.6.4 BIOS) and Matrox G200eW3 on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. test-results-r740--4: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0JMK61 (2.6.4 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 2000GB PERC H730P Mini + 239GB PERC H730P Mini + 960GB PERC H730P Mini, Graphics: Matrox G200eW3, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-143-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, HD@8fps, 21 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.1635 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, HD@8fps, 30 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 29.18 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, HD@8fps, 30 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 27.45 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, FHD@30fps, 17 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 16.57 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, HD@8fps, 6 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 6 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, FHD@30fps, 25 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.13 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, FHD@30fps, 25 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 60.39 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, FHD@30fps, 3 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 3 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, FHD@30fps, 3 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 8.18 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, HD@8fps, 14 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 19.14 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, FHD@30fps, 3 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.01 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, HD@8fps, 14 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 13.88 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, HD@8fps, 14 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.09 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, HD@8fps, 6 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 9.93 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, HD@8fps, 21 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 20.57 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, FHD@30fps, 10 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.13 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, HD@8fps, 21 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 24.55 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, FHD@30fps, 10 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 9.88 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, FHD@30fps, 25 Channels - Average Number Of Analytics Channels test-results-r740--4 . 24.69 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H264, FHD@30fps, 10 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 22.47 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, FHD@30fps, 17 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 7.91 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H264, HD@8fps, 30 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.15 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Remote Guarding, H265, FHD@30fps, 17 Channels - Average CPU Usage test-results-r740--4 . 46.21 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: Enterprise, H265, HD@8fps, 6 Channels - Average Processing Frame Rate test-results-r740--4 . 8.11 |==================================================